The Changes in Disciplining Children
Andrew McClarren
Disciplining Children Exemplification Essay
The United States once considered the conventional utilization of corporeal punishment by parents on children routine. However, contemporary times show these views are becoming outdated as today’s world varies tremendously from that of the past several decades. Children forty years ago, for example, received physical reprimand as a form of discipline. Styles of living and thinking continue to change. Many people disagree with the traditional belief that abuse remains the most effective means of punishing a child when it comes to misbehavior.
A majority of the older generation considers harsh punishment the most ideal means of discipline and that simple measures, along the lines of “timeouts” for instance, promote leniency by the parent. The overall purpose of disciplining kids stands to teach personal control over anger or wrongdoings, but the implementation of abuse instills fear between the adolescent and parent. Physical reprimand entertains the idea that opposed to discussing matters to solve an issue, exploding in anger and hurting others in the process appears acceptable.
A study conducted by the American Academy of Pediatrics asked 1,933 parents about habits of abuse at home on a child at age three, then again at age five and at the age of nine, the children completed tests which measured language abilities and destructive behavior. When asked if hitting takes place at home to utilize punishment on the three year old, 57% of mothers and 40% of fathers said yes. Compared to abuse done on five year olds, discoveries prove that discipline carried out by mothers resulted in more aggressive outward behavior and abusive fathers yielded lower scores when the tested on vocabulary skills (Bennett-Smith). Scientific test results shows that abuse inhibits learning and growth which combats the idea that physical correction remains effective. Though hitting and other forms of physical punishment stand to
Disciplining Children Exemplification Essay
The United States once considered the conventional utilization of corporeal punishment by parents on children routine. However, contemporary times show these views are becoming outdated as today’s world varies tremendously from that of the past several decades. Children forty years ago, for example, received physical reprimand as a form of discipline. Styles of living and thinking continue to change. Many people disagree with the traditional belief that abuse remains the most effective means of punishing a child when it comes to misbehavior.
A majority of the older generation considers harsh punishment the most ideal means of discipline and that simple measures, along the lines of “timeouts” for instance, promote leniency by the parent. The overall purpose of disciplining kids stands to teach personal control over anger or wrongdoings, but the implementation of abuse instills fear between the adolescent and parent. Physical reprimand entertains the idea that opposed to discussing matters to solve an issue, exploding in anger and hurting others in the process appears acceptable.
A study conducted by the American Academy of Pediatrics asked 1,933 parents about habits of abuse at home on a child at age three, then again at age five and at the age of nine, the children completed tests which measured language abilities and destructive behavior. When asked if hitting takes place at home to utilize punishment on the three year old, 57% of mothers and 40% of fathers said yes. Compared to abuse done on five year olds, discoveries prove that discipline carried out by mothers resulted in more aggressive outward behavior and abusive fathers yielded lower scores when the tested on vocabulary skills (Bennett-Smith). Scientific test results shows that abuse inhibits learning and growth which combats the idea that physical correction remains effective. Though hitting and other forms of physical punishment stand to