He is demining his wife’s thoughts and wants, and reduces her to a nonfunctioning or feeling part of his family. He’s denying her a separate identity way from himself and their children. Moreover, with his background in law it is very likely that he knows how to work the law in his favor. At the time women weren’t supposed to rebel against their husbands. They were expected to do what their husbands said without question. Because of this women often lost divorce cases and lost custody of children. Which shows that the problem is detrimental not only to his wife, but also to his
He is demining his wife’s thoughts and wants, and reduces her to a nonfunctioning or feeling part of his family. He’s denying her a separate identity way from himself and their children. Moreover, with his background in law it is very likely that he knows how to work the law in his favor. At the time women weren’t supposed to rebel against their husbands. They were expected to do what their husbands said without question. Because of this women often lost divorce cases and lost custody of children. Which shows that the problem is detrimental not only to his wife, but also to his