Preview

The Controversy Of Flag Burning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
299 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Controversy Of Flag Burning
With all the political conflicts going on today, one issue that has arisen again recently is the controversy of flag burning. The people that burn the flag claim they are making a statement; however, what is that statement? Is it appropriate to burn the flag as a statement of political discord or is it a disrespectful action that should be illegal? Below I will draw out the thoughts and reasoning behind both stances that have become a major issue in the U.S. again in the past several years.
Although the dispute of flag burning has come before the Supreme Court several times in the past several decades, “on June 11, 1990, the Supreme Court once again ruled that burning the flag was an example of constitutionally protected free speech” as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The respondent was convicted in Dallas County Criminal Court of desecration of a venerated object in violation of a Texas statute. He was sentenced to one year in prison and fined $2000. The respondent appealed his conviction through the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas. They affirmed the decision of the lower court. The respondent then petitioned for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. This court then reversed the decision finding Johnson’s flag burning to be “symbolic speech” protected by the First Amendment. Certiorari was granted. The case went to the Supreme Court.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A. Statute 42.09(a) (3) of the Texas Penal Code prohibits the “desecration of a venerable object.” This in lemans terms prohibits the burning of flags.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. The United States Supreme Court deemed that the burning of the flag did fall under the First Amendment, stating that Johnson could not be criminilaized for his…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Passage 1, "American Flag Stands for Tolerance," asserts direct ways that rights, freedom, and choices can be snatched. In the article it is stated that "each individual is to have the freedom to develop by his or her own lights, and not by the command of officialdom." Individuals should be able to live how they intent to instead of having the government decide how they should live. Furthermore why can people not stand up for their rights when "the flag stands for free expression of ideas, no matter how distastful?" People do not want other people interfering with how they want to live their lives. Having freedom snatched away can cause many individuals to do wrong things, such as burning the flag.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas vs Johnson

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The First amendment of the Constitution of America calls for the protection of the United states citizens from the United States congress. It states that congress shall not pass any laws favoring a specific religious belief or stop any particular group from worshiping them. The first amendment also protects the United States citizen by allowing them freedom of speech/press and peaceful assembly or petition of the governments policies.(billofrightsInstitute) In 1984 Ronald Reagan was trying to run for his second term as president, however thousands of people gathered in front of the Dallas city hall to protest Reagan’s policies and in that crowd a protester named Gregory Lee Johnson. Johnson pulled a stunt that ended him up in the Dallas city court house convicting him to desecrating the U.S. flag. The Dallas city court’s decision was tried and took to the supreme court for Johnsons first amendment right being violated. The supreme court actually came to the decision that Johnson was protected by the first amendment. “After this decision by the supreme court, there has been six times the house of representatives have tried to vote a constitutional amendment known as Flag desecration amendment which stated “ congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag”. This amendment has not received the 67 votes it needs to pass but hasn’t been less than 63 voted for all six occasions” (billofrightsInstitute)…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article talks about how the Supreme Court based a law by a 5-to-4 that a person can show their disagreement with the governmental policies by burning the American flag. It gives a vivid example of the other side of the law in china where people who peacefully express disagreement with the government policies may be slaughtered. Allen goes on to talk about how American flag is a cherished symbol of our nation. Allen also talks about how this is technically abiding by the First Amendment, It is the freedom of the people to express there freedom of expression of speech. He thinks that it is just an ironic situation because of the fundamental commitment to freedom.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Believe it or not saying goodbye is difficult to do. Everyone has said a goodbye once or more in their life and they are never easy. The article “Lowering the Flag” by Charles Krauthammer, published on June 25, 2015 in the Washington Post, addresses the issue of saying goodbye to something that is a significant part of the United States. Krauthammer begins his piece with the heartbreaking massacre that took place in a Charleston church then writes about how gun control has not made any improvement and finally moves into expressing that many want the Confederate flag to be removed. Krauthammer’s article is effective because he uses pathos to capture the heart of the reader, he is a credible writer that has a tone that is professional yet questions…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Canada had been an outstanding country for many years but has always lacked one important thing. Until the year 1965, Canada did not have their own official flag. The Canadian flag debate was a major controversy to Canada because many thought it was about time for Canada to have their own flag years after gaining their independence from Britain. The Canadian flag debate had a very interesting background and the Canadians involvement towards the flag debate was just phenomenal. As well as the creation of the Canadian flag, there was also a great deal of importance behind the Canadian flag debate itself within Canada. The Canadian flag debate was one of the most significant parts of Canadian history in the modern era.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why do people burn the flag? The issue of freedom of speech is people are abusing the freedom of speech. This issue is important because some people are burning the american flag. Also after school officials banned civil rights groups from recruiting on campus. Students at the University of California organized sit ins, rallies, and strikes. People who were involved were students from Berkeley named, Mario Savio, and Bettina Apthecker. The common good of people should respect it because they US gave us that privilege of speech. We owe our government the respect because they are the ones who gave us the right.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Francis Mejia Period 4 Many parts of the United States Constitution can be interpreted in different ways. This makes it difficult to make decisions on cases because of the many possible ways to look at what is constitutional and what is not. In every court decision, The Supreme Court must carefully analyze and interpret the amendments to the Constitution and apply them. The first Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” One controversial case involving the rules of the First Amendment was Snyder v. Phelps in 2010.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment clearly states that congress shall not make any law abridging the freedom of speech. If our government isn’t going to avid by the amendments, then why have them? If they are going to ban the confederate flag then they should be banned for not corresponding with our god given rights. The constitutional amendments are what our government is supposed to stick to.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burning the flag in protest is our right as stated by the Constitution. If we allow our government to ban flag burning, it is no longer a matter of protecting our flag's meaning because the more restrictive our government becomes, the more we lose the meaning of the flag. Our flag symbolizes the freedom of our nation and its immense diversity. With this much diversity, we must keep everyone's opinion in mind. If we take away the power of the individual, we become weaker as a whole…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Flag Speeches

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I agree with this statement one-hundred percent, because when growing up passing a house with a flag I would always say they support America. Now that I am older I see it as they have pride in where they live, in the country of the brave and the free. “After the horrible tragedy of September eleventh 2001, patriotism flourished, flags were everywhere.”(Hemphill) I believe patriotism should still rage and we should show full pride in our country, the freedoms we have are just not fully appreciated sometimes. But I do not in any way believe that desecration of the flag so be a right, or…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In America, we are founded upon the rules and guidelines provided by our Constitution, but those rules and guidelines are constantly open to your own interpretation. When certain conflicts arise, we turn to our Constitution for admonition. But where do the provisions of our Constitution end? In the articles “Texas v. Johnson: Majority Opinion” and “American Flag Stands for Tolerance”, the issue of whether or not the First Amendment allows for people to use the burning of the American flag as a form of protest—but one does it better than the other.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many individuals and groups alike that choose to express their disdain for certain actions, laws, and behaviors through the use of Freedom of Speech. The First Amendment has been cited by many protesters when demonstrating that it is their right to Freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression is powerful enough that sometimes words do not have to be spoken for a message to be conveyed. However, not all acts are protected by the First Amendment. For example, burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment but promoting the benefits of marijuana at a school event would be protected (U.S. Courts, n.d). If by chance there is a question of constitutionality regarding the First Amendment, it is usually linked to the overbreadth doctrine. Simply meaning, an individual may feel that their rights and/or others rights to Freedom of Speech may be prohibited by laws when applied under the context in which they were written. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is the most quoted case that addresses issues of the overbreadth doctrine as it pertains to the First Amendment.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays