Preview

The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
488 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty
Did you know that 1,432 people have been executed since 1976? Capital punishment, aka the death penalty has claimed countless lived since it’s establishment in the United States in 1608. Executions happen pretty often, with 38 people being killed last year alone. The death penalty is an unnecessary and horrible punishment which should not be allowed. Some may claim that the death penalty is just, and others claim it is inhumane. I think that the death penalty can be substituted by a sentence to life in prison. Supporters may say that murderers don’t deserve mercy and that they deserve to die. But what they forget is that though they may have killed someone, they are humans too. In addition, most murders are committed under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or by someone who is mentally ill. Criminals are commonly drug and alcohol abusers. So when they commit a crime under the influence, we should automatically put them to death instead of trying to rehabilitate them to help them be a productive member of society? That just doesn’t sound right. Most supporters believe they should die, but they shouldn’t suffer. But what happens when an execution is botched? Take for example, the execution of Clayton Lockett. On the morning of his execution, he hid under the covers of his bed. He made of noose out of his sheets, pulled the blade out of a safety …show more content…

But does murder solve murders? According to multiple scientific studies, they don’t. In fact, in states without the death penalty, the crime rate is lower than the states that do. North Carolina’s crime rates dropped almost immediately after executions stopped. In a 2008 survey, criminologists and police chiefs around the country ranked the use of the death penalty at the bottom of a list of effective crime fighting tools. They said that more law enforcement resources were the most needed tool for reducing violent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We’re only ­human, we all make mistakes." The death penalty has been the highest form of criminal punishment in the American judicial system since the 13 colonies. There has been many forms of the death penalty like hanging, stoning, drowning, burning, beheading, gasing, electrocution, and injection. The taking of a man's life as punishment for criminal behavior is wrong. The moral injustice of murder, the cruelty of execution, and the death of innocent men are all concerns that make the death penalty wrong. The government should abolish the death penalty in order to observe morality, end cruelty, and protect innocent men. What is the death penalty?…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been one of the most controversial issues throughout history. Also known as the capital punishment, the death penalty is a government punishment of death on a certain person to find justice for the crime committed by the criminal. Some of the people that have been sentenced to the death penalty weren’t proven to be guilty of committing the crime. There are a lot of ways that a person can get legally executed by the death penalty, however all of the punishments are still cruel and very harsh. Every single state has their own laws and not all of the states have the death penalty, moreover many states banned the capital punishment because it caused many problems within it’s people. Many people are against and others…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the murdered victim’s family perspective, we seek justice for our beloved one; we have to be the voice of our loved one since they cannot speak for themselves. I understand that capital punishment is a subject of controversial debate in the United States, and some people are against the death penalty, as they believe it to be cruel and unusual punishment. However, the Supreme Court has taken precautions and enacted a sentencing guideline to ensure that capital punishment is the right sentence; “States could establish a two-stage procedure consisting of a trial at which the question of culpability could be determined, during which evidence might be presented to make the death penalty decision better informed.” (Hendrix & Inciardi, 2013,…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty Controversy

    • 585 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Now the question is, is the death penalty the answer for particular individuals who have committed various acts of heinous crimes such as murder? The states that do take part in the death penalty have different things that technically qualify one for getting the death penalty. In a general sense there usually has to be a murder that is caused by an offender in one way or another. I think that however that each case is different and unique in its own way of course and it may be hard to distinguish what is credible for getting the death penalty versus just being locked up for life. I originally was in favor of the death penalty because I figured there’s no need to feed and clothe and give shelter to some horrible people, just get rid of them. I look at it like, there’s people living out on the streets without any of the things that these inmates have and they might not have even hurt anyone in there entire life, yet the one who has killed women and children or whoever, is the one getting the hot meal at night.…

    • 585 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Putting people to death, judged to have committed certain extremely heinous crimes, is a practice that’s been around for along time. In the later half of the twentieth century, it has become a controversial issue. As a supporter of the death penalty, I consider this to be a good thing for my country and its citizens. Capital punishment deters crime. Statistics prove consisted application of the death penalty deter crime. No executed murdered has ever killed again. For many years, Criminologists have thought to believe the death penalty has no affect as deterrence to homicides. From 1972-1976, a suspension was place on capital punishment. The United States had 9,140 murders in 1960 where 56 people were executed. Nine years Later in 1969 where the United States had zero executions, their were 14,590 murders. After only 2 executions since 1976, murders rised to 23,040. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, It would put fear of capital punishment into the "would be" murderers. A person is less likely to commit a crime if they believe that they will be punished for their criminal act.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The death penalty is an age-old punishment where a person is put to death for certain serious crimes such as murder. This punishment is intended to make potential murderers think twice before killing someone out of fear of losing their own life. Personally, I agree with the death penalty because, for a civilized society, preventing murder should be a priority. The death penalty is the most severe punishment available, as it takes a person’s life away, and in addition to serving as punishment, it also serves as a means of preventing the criminal from committing further crime. This punishment, in name alone, is an indicator of just how detrimental the individual’s crime really was.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Is Death Penalty Wrong

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is it fair to take the life of an individual for something they have done? Is it justified to end the existence of a human beings life for crimes they commit? Capital punishment is the act of punishing someone’s crimes with death. It is currently legal in 31 states in the United States and is a very controversial topic that has recently been under discussion. Capital punishment is not wrong and is justified under the right circumstances.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    Proponents of the death penalty say it is an important tool for preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment. They argue that retribution or "an eye for an eye" honors the victim, helps console grieving families, and ensures that the perpetrators of heinous crimes never have an opportunity to cause future tragedy. The death penalty is reserved for the most serious crimes. Today 34 states, the federal states and the government has authorized the death penalty for some crimes. The supreme court has found the death penalty to be constitutional. Execution is indeed a severe form of punishment and shoe not be taken lightly therefore it is appointed to a just and appropriate sanction. And the execution of the human being by the state is never a pleasant thing. However, we believe that such executions would in fact deter potential murderers and prevent second killings by those who have been proven to be killers. The saving of the innocent lives far outweighs any concern we should have for convicted killers. and that is why capital punishment should be maintained and made a reality once more. We have proven that it is indeed a fact that it is becoming more expensive to keep these criminals alive. we have proven that it costs an average of $47,000 a year to keep an inmate in prison in the state of California. and even over 2/3 of these costs are for security and inmate health care!…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, a death penalty, also known as capital punishment does, in fact, save lives. Common sense, it tells us that the death penalty will deter murder, if anything does not. People fear nothing more than death itself. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death. This is because, death is final. It ends everything that we could be, or do. But where there is life there is hope. Wherefore, life in prison is less feared for the offenders because at the end, they might escape or be freed from prison.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty Wrong

    • 2717 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “Evidence for capital punishment’s general deterrent effect comes from three sources: logic, firsthand reporters, and social science research” (Cassell and Bedau 189). Logic supports the conclusion that the death penalty is the most effective deterrent for some kinds of murders, those that require reflection and forethought by persons of reasonable intelligence and unimpaired mental faculties. Firsthand reports from criminals and victims confirm our logical intuition that the death penalty deters (Cassell and Bedau 190). Senator Dianne Feinstein recounted her experience in the 1960s sentencing of a women convicted of robbery in the first degree. She asked the women why was the gun that she brought unloaded, the women replayed, “So I would not panic, kill somebody, and get the death penalty” (Cassell and Bedau 190). This is a great example of how the death penalty does cause people to question their actions before they go through with them. Even if this was the only case where a life was saved, one innocent life is worth putting to death a psycho killer. Texas is one of many states showing the greatest relative improvements overtime due to the death…

    • 2717 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty serves no purpose in society today. Statistics show that the death penalty has no deterrent effect on crime. Allowing the government to enforce the death penalty gives them power to take human life, and creates a margin for social injustice. The death penalty should be abolished due to legal, social, and morality concerns.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scrap

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty lacks the deterrent effect which is commonly referred to by its advocates. As recently stated by the General Assembly of the United Nations, “there is no conclusive evidence of the deterrent value of the death penalty” (UNGA Resolution 65/206). It is noteworthy that in many retentionist states, the effectiveness of the death penalty in order to prevent crime is being seriously questioned by a continuously increasing number of law enforcement professionals.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    death penalty

    • 816 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Capital punishment is immoral and a violation of natural rights. It is wrong for everyone involved: the prosecuted innocent, criminals, victims’ families, and our nation. We need to replace the death penalty and capital punishment with life without parole, a safer and more inexpensive option. The death penalty does not guarantee safety for innocent victims, it does not follow the goals and promises of our nation, it does not effectively deter crime, and it does not give closure to victims’ families. Nothing good comes of hate, and nothing good can ever come from capital punishment. It cannot continue to be accepted by a nation that claims to have liberty and justice for all. The death penalty is murder on the sly and it’s dead wrong.…

    • 816 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conclusion: The death penalty violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection, and is not a viable form of crime control.The government should not give itself the right to kill human beings, especially when it kills with premeditation and ceremony, in the name of the law or in the name of its people, or when it does so in an arbitrary fashion. A society that respects life does not deliberately kill human beings. The death penalty is uncivilized, and unfair.It is the ultimate denial of human right and the premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the state. This cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment is done in the name of justice. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays