Preview

The Cosmological Argument Essay: Does God Exist?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
768 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Cosmological Argument Essay: Does God Exist?
The question of “Does God exist,” is a question that many people have tried to answer throughout many centuries. Although the answer to whether He exist or not is unsolved and most likely never will be solved, the answer to whether we can prove that he exists is a relatively easy one to answer. The answer is simply, no. We cannot prove whether He exist, but on the other hand no scientist or philosopher has ever been able to prove that He does not exist. Although the answer is quite simple, we can explore the several arguments for and against His existence. The first argument we will indulge in is the cosmological argument. A cosmological argument is an argument that states that everything in the universe is dependent on something greater. For this to be true, at the end of a long line there would have to be an omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent being. These contingencies on a …show more content…

The teleological argument shows that the earth could not just appear here, but had intelligence behind its composition. This belief argues that the earth had to be fine-tuned and developed by a divine mind. This argument supports the belief in God more than any other found. This is due to the growing amount of evidence supporting the argument. As scientist discover more about the universe, more and more is added to the list of scientific evidences supporting the teleological argument. The final argument is the moral argument. This argument states that if God does not exist, then morality and moral beliefs do not exist. Although, since we know that morals do exist, God must exist as well. To prove this argument wrong, you must believe that morals do not exist, or that God is not the standard for morality. Since most atheist do not want to state that morality does not exist, they must argue that God is not the standard for morality. To this day no one has been able to conceive a defensible grounding for moral

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is no adequate evidence that God exists, nor is there adequate evidence that God does not exist.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1970’s philosopher McCloskey brings into question the three major arguments that are commonly presented against the question of God’s existence. McCloskey does so in an article entitled “On Being an Atheist.” In this article McCloskey commonly refers to these arguments as “proofs” rather than simply arguments. Furthermore, he argues that these “proofs” can’t be positively established and therefore one should throw said “proofs” out. In terms of a theistic view on the question of God’s existence theist openly admit that there arguments could indeed be defeasible. Theists acknowledge that there is a possibility that a defeater can be presented to shut down the conclusion…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting off, the atheistic view of the beginning of the universe occurring by chance is irrational and irreverent in many ways. The thought of the universe just existing from no cause, let alone not a personal cause is just illogical. This universe has a contingency for God and the Kalam cosmological argument proves this. The Kalam cosmological argument is a well-organized argument for God that has been developed from Muslim philosophers al-Kindi and al-Ghazali, and has been reinvented by philosopher William Lane Craig. The Kalam argument is very simple and straightforward. It is dealt with as a series of dilemmas. Those dilemmas starts with since the universe exists, is there a beginning or no beginning, is that beginning caused or uncaused, and is that cause personal or impersonal. The first premise states that whatever begins to exist as a cause. This premise if very logical and denying it is only possible to have things come from a cause is counterintuitive. The second premise of the Kalam cosmological argument states that universe began…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ontological argument rests on the premise that the universe’s existence is contingent- it depends on something else to exist. The argument is deductive, analytic and a priori, and was first formed by St. Anselm, who prayed for a short argument that would prove God to be “that than which nothing greater can be conceived”. This prayer was called the proslogion and tried to prove God by means of reductio ad absurdum, which states that the existence of God is logically necessary. The argument is based on the word “God”, a being that possesses all perfections, therefore must exist. Anselm was aware that the existence of God is denied by atheists and in response to this, he states “the fool has said in his heart there is no God”.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existence of God has been a popular and yet ongoing debate for many years now. There are many arguments that argue for God’s existence just as there are many arguments against God’s existence. This paper will argue for the proof of God’s existence according to William Paley’s teleological argument. The teleological argument is often described as an argument which stems from either design or intelligent design, but this can be considered as misleading.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On a similar matter, can the existence of God be proven? This is a difficult question to answer. I am a devout Christian, but I have done extensive research on this topic and I keep coming back to the conclusion of no. I do not believe it is possible to prove the existence of God,…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not find any of the traditional proofs for God’s existence persuasive, and I will go over each argument one at a time to explain why I do not find them persuasive, starting with Anselm’s ontological argument, then Aquinas’ cosmological argument, and finally Paley’s teleological argument. First, Anselm’s ontological argument is not persuasive because the argument can be used to prove things that do not exist. The faulty logic is shown in Gaunilo’s Lost Island Objection because instead of putting God as the thing to prove, Guanilo puts an island, and the logic still holds up. However, the argument does not hold up and would need more evidence or logical backing for why God works and the island does not. If someone says one is true, but the…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Teleological Argument

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages

    These three main arguments include the ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments. The teleological argument has evolved from antiquity and has been termed the physico-theological argument, argument from design, intelligent argument design, and the fine-tuned universe argument. The basic concept of the argument states that the world shows evidence of a designer because of its perfection, harmony, and consistency. The World Library defines teleological as:…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments collectively strive to prove one point, the existence of God. Ontological arguments lean on reasoning to prove its point of an a priori being or existence. Cosmological arguments focus on the idea that because there is this vast universe with an infinite amount of galaxies, God or a higher being, must have had a hand in creating the world and universe we live in. Teleological arguments emphasize on the idea that the universe was created solely to carry out the purpose or end result that it was designed for by…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Response Paper

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Another statement made by McCloskey regarding the cosmological argument states that the argument "does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-perfect, uncaused cause."{2} Evans and Manis' response basically says that there are…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays