South Africa has gone from being a place where indigenous African culture and tribal rivalry ruled the fields to a place that is today very much a replica of a European society. Throughout the evolution of this nation, one of the most distinct events along its timeline was the creation of the Union of South Africa. The Union was created after much debate between both the British and the Boers and it seemed clear to all that both these forces had clear agendas which they wanted fulfilled. A blue print on a united South Africa was agreed on after much compromise between the British, Boers and also the Indigenous Africans.
In May 1902 the British and the Boers signed the Treaty of Vereeniging which signaled the end of all hostilities in the Anglo-Boer war and a new phase for South Africa. “The peace agreement which concluded the Second Anglo-Boer war was, as Milner said, an unusual agreement, one that extracted no indemnity from the defeated.” During the war the British adopted a policy which was known as the “Scorched Earth policy”. This policy meant that brigades of infantry and light horseman were sent out to obliterate all Boer farms, which meant the destruction of all livestock, crops and also all manufacturing facilities and machinery. The point of this policy was to try and cut off all supplies and supplying capabilities to the Boers, who were “invisible” to the British as they were undertaking highly effective Guerilla warfare tactics. The logic behind this policy was if their supplies were cut they would eventually starve to death or surrender to the British. About 26,000 Boer women and children died as a consequence of being forced into concentration camps where many were killed by disease, starvation, malnutrition or injuries sustained from physical abuse.
“The British got exactly what they wanted out of the war, they now owned some of the richest Gold mines in the world, yet many of the British, from both South Africa and Mother England, were terribly ashamed of what occurred as a consequence of their ambitions.” As a result of all these events the guilt many people of British decent felt was immeasurable and therefore they imposed little on the Boers in the Treaty of Vereeniging and instead of paying them three million pounds as stated in the treaty they in fact outlaid fifteen million pounds in compensation to the Boers, the same people who were shooting at them only months previous. Many people claim that even though the “British won the war the Boers had decisively won the peace.”
The Treaty of Vereeniging was the first obvious racial compromise in South Africa between Britain and France and was the prelude to the Union of South Africa. The Treaty laid the foundations for more and more compromises of this sort when the possibility of a united South Africa was being discussed. When the Union was being discussed at a formal level the Boers had extensive bargaining power in negotiations as they made sure the British did not forget the atrocities they performed during the war. The British were desperate to be “mates” with the Boers again which therefore made them quite lenient in giving the Boers what they wanted. “Even though the Boers accepted British sovereignty, they were promised eventual self-rule and vast amounts of native land for their corporate usage.”
The continual and discernible efforts from the British, towards repairing relationships with the Boers, still did not seem enough to gain Boer favour and therefore the British needed to find a common element that would tie both the British and the Boers together and they found that in ethnicity. “One thing that unified the whites, was the belief that it had been a ‘white mans war’ therefore should remain a ‘white man’s country’” The indigenous Africans during war were promised dramatically increased working conditions, the return of previously owned land, the extension of the franchise and increased political power all if they fought side by side with the British. These promises proved to be empty as the British decided that the Boers were more valuable allies than the indigenous peoples and after the war actually stole land from the blacks and allocated it to the Boers for agricultural usage. “In 1913 indigenous Africans made up 78% of the South African population, yet 92.7% of land in the country was under white control.” As the constitution was drawn up it was specifically specified that only whites could become members of parliament and only white males who owned property could utilise his right to vote.
“Although the majority of white South Africans were enthusiastic about the proposed Union, many Blacks were dismayed to see the colour ban enshrined in the draft legislation.” The British had done a clear disservice to the indigenous Africans due to the Boers having an increasing influence over the British. This was a clear racial compromise between all three parties in South Africa and a decision that set up the groundwork for the apartheid atrocities. Preston, A. (1989) Pictorial History of South Africa, Bison Books Ltd, London. Harrison, D. (1981) The White Tribe of Africa, British Broadcasting Company, London. Anderson M. (2001) Challenge, Change and Continuity, John Wiley and Sons Australia, Milton QLD. Preston, A. (1989) Pictorial History of South Africa, Bison Books Ltd, London. Davenport, TRH. (1977) South Africa, A Modern History, The Macmillan Press, Hampshire. Anderson M. (2001) Challenge, Change and Continuity, John Wiley and Sons Australia, Milton QLD Preston, A. (1989) Pictorial History of South Africa, Bison Books Ltd, London.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
opposing British power, all of which they could not do without multiplying military costs (Doc…
- 354 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The Boer War took place In South Africa under the command of the then Prime minister Lord Salisbury and was mainly started to gain access to South Africa’s cheap raw materials, especially gold and to add another colony to the empire as the conservatives who were in control were all for the British empire and very patriotic. Before the War England was in control of cape colony in South Africa which was below the two Boer colonies (Rhodesia and the Orange Free State) and was also in control of Zimbabwe which was above the two. These two colonies were once controlled by the Dutch but they had pulled out and given the two colonies independence. This was even more of a reason for England to take over as now the colonies were independent the Dutch would not come to their aid. The take over was expected to be quick and fast and take no longer than 5 months seeing as the colonies were made up of villages and farmers against the might of the British army. The war did not go to plan and these so called farmers put up a strong fight by using guerrilla warfare. A war that was expected to last 5 months ended up lasting 3 years and along with it came a huge loss of life with around 20,000 British soldiers dying. This news was not taken well back in England and the war was classed as a huge disaster. Also the way in which the war was won was treated with disgust too. With desperation setting in, in order to stomp out this guerrilla warfare Lord Kitchener burned down villages and put all Boers in prison camps. The conditions in these camps were awful and many people caught diseases such as cholera and typhoid and many died of malnutrition. This news got back to England and many voters were angered in the way at which the Boers were being…
- 2058 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
Their leader Shaka had planted all his ideas and teachings into the Zulu people and because of him, they had this fearless persona about them to. All they were known for was wreaking havoc and growing their already growing empires with trained a killer, which was going to be a problem. I resented the British Laws that was passed to abolish slavery. If they never passed these laws things would have never changed and this would have never stroked their already growing egos. These laws caused us Boers to revolt and try to escape British rule. This was one of the key opponents that lead us into battle with the Zulu people. These ignorant, blood-thirsty, man slaying, people are dangerous. They start countless wars and make a lot of enemies which would hurt them because they were creating countless enemies. The only thing that they know how to do is how to kill and to start war amongst themselves, when we were trying to compromise with them. We was only trying to teach these barbaric people some of our ways and to civilize them, trying to help the blacks of the South Africa. All the “Great” King of The Zulu Land had to do was disband his military and recognize Britain’s authority, or face invasion. As usual they chose what they knew how to do best, which was how to start war. The same British people that passed the slave abolishing law for these people they were now going into war with them. So not only did they have wars with Boers they also had war with the British now to, how ironic. Even though I despise these people they were very courageous. It’s almost funny how the Zulu’s thought they could defeat us with their sticks. They knew that they could not have stopped us with their assegai which was basically a spear, while we…
- 619 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The origins of this conflict would have had to begun with Paul Krugers Ultimatum, if no such order for British troops to leave Natal was placed, there would never have been an outbreak. Those flithy Boers do not have the right to attempt to claim Natal or Cape Colony, these are rightfully owned British lands!…
- 348 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The article, South Africa: Paradoxes in the Place of Race, written by Saul Dubow is a chapter in the The Oxford Handbook of the History Eugenics which discusses the relationship between the nineteenth century and the contemporary context of eugenics. The handbook discusses eugenics in South East Asia, Iran and South Africa. Dubow’s chapter focuses on the eugenics of South Africa. The article converses the suggestion that eugenics as well as correlated scientific ideas play a significant role in the endorsement of systems such as apartheid and its prototype. The article expands on a broad scheme of racial discrimination as a state program in the earliest decades of the twentieth century. It then goes on to rectify the differences between different…
- 400 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Why did South Africa change? 1. International boycott weakened economy 2. Expensive to fund wars with neighbors and keep down insurrections 3. Moderate Afrikaner leader – F.W. de Klerk 4.…
- 2248 Words
- 9 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Afrikaners felt that their two options when dealing with the native Africans were either equality or the separation of races, however, they thought equality meant death for the nation. In order to save the country, Afrikaners believed that that they had to separate the people because they thought it was beneficial towards everyone. In a statement by the National Party of South Africa it stated, “... the future of every race will be protected and safeguarded with full opportunities for development and self-maintenance in their own ideas, without clashing with the interests of the other” (Doc 1). The National Party explained at the beginning of Apartheid how it was best for the country and how everything would be separate, but they each would have opportunities. They made it seem like Apartheid was the best option and without Apartheid it would mean national…
- 1371 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1910, eight years after the Boer Wars in South Africa, the British created the Union of South Africa (Duiker and Spielvolgel, 2014). The new union created a representative government, but it only applied to the colonists not the native Africans. The indigenous population were still subject the crown and not independent like the Europeans in…
- 423 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Imperialism was a movement that affected all parts of the world, beginning as early as the 19th century. Wealthy and established nations would annex and take control of underdeveloped nations and civilize them. This may sound good in theory, but Imperialism seemed to take advantage of the so-called “inferior” nations more than truly help them. The economic superpowers seized the land of the territories they thought to be subordinate, using it as trading depots, an outlet to gain natural resources, and to civilize the native people. These three factors continued to be a main staple in society of South Africa even after imperialism ended and it was an independent nation. Racial segregation was extreme, and it all stemmed from imperialistic qualities left from those such as Ferry and Paton. Qualities assumed from imperialistic times had a lasting negative effect on South Africa, leading to racial segregation and a sense of inferiority in the black population during the second half of the 20th century.…
- 1446 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The Zulus lost the Battle and their Kingdom * 1887 Under British control * Boers & British in Cape * 1st Europeans settle in South Africa were the Dutch * 1625 Dutch came to the Cape of Good Hope * established way station for sailing between Dutch East Indies and the Netherlands * Those Dutch settlers were known as the Boers * 1880s British took over the Cape Colony PERMANENTLY * Boers clashed over British policy (land & slaves) * 1830s Great Trek * Boers moved to North in order to escape the British African Colonization & Independence * 1884 Western leaders met to divide Africa into colonial holdings * 1914 nearly all of Africa is under European controls * European imperial powers set national borders in Afirca without regard for local ethnic or political divisions 1898 Fashoda Incident * France & Britain nearly went to war over Sudan * France backed down in the face of the Dreyfus Affair * Wanted to connect Cape to Cairo by railroads 1899 ~ 1902 The Boer War (South Africa War) * Boers blamed British bringing the "outsiders" into Africa (for minerals… diamonds and gold) * 1st modern "total" war * British countered by burning Boer lands and imprisoning women and children * Black South Africans were involved in the war * British won * 1910 Boer republics joined Union of South Africa, which was controlled by the British * Cecil Rhodes * Prime Minister of Cape Colony * Principal sponsor of the Cape-to-Cairo (British wanted to control over the continent)…
- 1863 Words
- 8 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Response Assignment #1 South Africa in the late 19th and early 20th century was comparable to a fresh piece of metal: a malleable entity. As a country exposed to various global influences, South Africa has been vulnerable to various political, ideological and cultural movements and thus molded to fit such philosophies. Some of the main influencers included leaders such as Marcus Garvey and various visitors from the US. Although African Americans and Garvey had mostly positive impacts with their influence, Garvey most noticeably had an impact through his controversial idea of racial nationalism. Most notably in the late 1800’s, African Americans started to become role models to Africans with their journeys to South Africa, presenting…
- 861 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
South African apartheid was caused mainly by two major events around the world. The first crisis was Word War II. To begin, most South Africans were of German descent and when the Germans needed more soldiers to fight the war, they unified against the British. However, South Africa was a British territory. This, in turn, caused many political separations in the South African government. For more information, the article, Second World War and its Impact 1939-1948 by South African History Online explains, “At that point, the country was led by the United Party, a coalition of the National Party (NP) of J B M Hertzog and the South African Party (SAP) of J C Smuts. Hertzog preferred that South Africa remain neutral in World War Two, while Smuts wanted to fight on the side of the Allies” (SAHO 2011). For further elaboration, the prime minister JBM Hertzog gave up his seat and Smuts took his place. The next event was a group inside Hertzog’s National Party, or NP, broke away and formed the Herenigde Nasionale…
- 871 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
At the end of a violent, unjust and racially biased thirty-four year policy put in place by the ruling minority, the National Party lead by white South Africans, the new government, the African National Congress (ANC) had questions that they needed to answer. Questions such as how we go about providing justice and healing for the majority of a nation that has been forced to live in conditions of extreme poverty, experienced brutal and violent racism for the majority of their lives and have had loved ones wrongly imprisoned or worse murdered for no reason at all? For such an incredibly large scale task this was not going to be easy for the ANC to do.…
- 2172 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
“It is a difficult history,” he agreed. “But we have to know all of it.” South Africa has sought to “restore justice” after apartheid in a pursuit to heal historic wounds, it is widely admired and often imitated, and ever rightly so, writes Anne Applebaum. Given how bitter the conflict had seemed when she had last visited, KwaZulu was the scene of a violent ethnic struggle; the relative peace that reigns in a relatively integrated South Africa feels in this case miraculous.…
- 597 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One must understand that our country is not run on instant decisions and spur of the moment choices, but by planning and dedication to making the lives of South African people a much more pleasant journey. Some believe that planning and dedication do not exist in the government today one cannot justify or overrule this statement by simply watching on the surface!…
- 960 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays