Preview

The Defense Of Marriage Act

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1186 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Defense Of Marriage Act
not qualify for living in families only neighborhood zones, and are unable to receive family rates for auto, health or homeowner’s insurance. In the case of divorce same sex couples are unable to receive shares of marital possessions, they also cannot receive child or spousal support or visitation rights (Guillen) With all these burdens from not being able to receive marital benefits heterosexual couples are given, DOMA is a terrible policy that hurts many same sex marriages, and families.
Deny First and Fourteenth Amendment
The first Amendment states that: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
…show more content…
DOMA in trying to preserve marriage as being between one man and one woman did a good job, not allowing untraditional marriages to be recognized in the eyes of Federal Government, however the policy was overall ineffective. The defense of Marriage Act caused great pain for same sex couples by not allowing them to receive marital benefits. They also had the emotional pain of being told their marriage was not valid in certain states. Finally, in 2013, after the law being in effect for seventeen years, DOMA was found to be unconstitutional going against both the 1st and 14th amendment. Same sex marriages would now not be discriminated against in the eyes of Federal Government.
With the Defense of Marriage Act being brought to the supreme court there has been some hefty government spending. The House of Representatives is the one paying legal bills, and the total has come to six times more than originally anticipated. Initially a $500,000 budget was authorized; however it was quickly raised to $3,000,000 as law suit costs rose (Hickey)
…show more content…
This policy was able to keep marriage traditional, however it was unconstitutional, and therefore ineffective. With much bipartisan support in both houses of congress the bill was easily passed and quickly signed by President Bill Clinton. Once the law was in action many same sex marriages were harmed. Marital status varying from state to state caused much distress for same sex marriages, making them second class citizens. The Federal Government not recognizing same sex marriages also added to the distress by not giving couples marital benefits they deserved. DOMA was found to unconstitutional in a five to four ruling in United States v. Windsor on bases of depriving citizens of their 1st amendment, freedom of religion, and their 14th amendment, Equal Protection Clause. DOMA ended up costing the Federal Government $3,000,000 and prevented an economical boost provided by same sex marriage. DOMA was an unsuccessful policy, and the United States was better off without

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (Sprigg) The court found that it is up to each individual state to make their own policy on same – sex marriage which was not followed during the time of Windsor. In regards to due process and equal protection, the Supreme Court found DOMA violated laws that the federal government placed in order for all people to be treated equally. (Sprigg) The majority stated that the main purpose of DOMA was to make same – sex couples feel at loss, especially when they were in a marriage. The law wanted homosexuals to feel like they lost their respect for their spouse.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DOMA Ruling Case Study

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DOMA caused the federal government to not recognize gay marriages. This meant gay and lesbian partners of federal employees did not receive federal health insurance,…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the U.S government recognized their marriage, the estate would have qualified for the spousal exemption and Windsor would not have had to pay any taxes. Windsor started this lawsuit seeking a full refund of the federal estate tax. Also, Windsor proclaimed that DOMA’s Section 3 is unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the Fifth Amendment. The issue here is whether the Defense of Marriage Act violates the right to equal protection of same-sex couples who are legally married under…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSA Case Study

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The Establishment clause for the First Amendment says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”,…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (http://www.law.cornell.edu).…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Edith Windsor

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    District Court for the Southern District of New York, to request a refund challenging DOMA section three, due to same-sex couples being denied the estate tax marital deduction, though the estate tax marital deduction applies to all lawfully married couples. The third section of DOMA states, “In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.” Since this statement is written under the third section of DOMA, the IRS notified Windsor on May 26, 2010, their decision that the estate of a deceased person who was married to another person of the same sex, could not hold the right to the marital deduction. Section three of DOMA is unconstitutional because it excludes same-sex spouses from the benefits that heterosexual spouses have, including the estate of tax marital deduction. On June 6, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York accepted the summary judgement motion that Windsor had filed for.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similarly, Justices interpretation of the Constitution using their personal ideology played an important role in the same-sex marriage issue. In 1996, President Bill Clinton signed DOMA act into law which banned same-sex marriage because marriage was believed to be between man and woman. In the United States V. Windsor (2013) case, the Justices interpreted the DOMA as unconstitutional and as a violation of the Fifth…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    GOVT 2306 Bill of Rights

    • 874 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.…

    • 874 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1996, the Supreme Court enacted The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which the third section defined the words marriage and spouse to refer to the legal joining of a man and a woman. This would legally bar any same-sex couples from receiving legal…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exam review

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Defense of Marriage Act(DOMA): Act that denied federal recognition to same-sex couples and gave states the right to legally ignore gay or lesbian marriages should they gain legal recognition in Hawaii or any other state. Signed into law by President Bill Clinton.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states - “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The same-sax marriage was a disputed topic that everyone would like to speak, but no any political will or popular sentiment for it until recently. In the case United States v. Windsor, the United States Supreme Court declared that same-sex couples are recognized by federal law and can receive federal benefits which the estate would have qualified for a marital exemption, and no taxes would have been imposed. Edith Windsor, who married to Thea Clara Spyer in Canada in 2007, after she lost her spouse in 2009, she could not be entitled to the estate tax benefits because they were same-sex couple. Even though their marriage was recognized by New York state law, she still had to pay $363,000 estate tax if she wanted to inherit her spouse’s house…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Same sex marriage is when two people with the same gender get married. Most people label it as homosexual, gay or lesbian marriage. Allowing same gender couples to legally marry is considered to be one of the most important of all LGBT rights. Same sex marriage isn’t hurting anyone, personal I don’t have a problem with it. People should love and be able to marry anyone they please. America is supposed to be a free place. Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Iceland the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, and Sweden are the 12 countries that allow same sex marriage. Alaska and Hawaii were the first states to legally ban gay marriage in 1998. As of Nov. 7, 2012, gay marriage has been legalized in nine US states (ME, MD, MA, CT, IA, VT, NH, NY, and WA) and the District of Columbia. Though gay marriage wasn't legal until the 2000s, gay couples were getting married on TV shows in the 1990s. Sitcom Roseanne featured a gay marriage in 1995 while Friends featured a lesbian wedding in 1996. In 2004, the House passed what it called the Marriage Protection Act. This legislation would have prevented the federal courts from addressing the issue of marriage. The legislation was not brought up for a vote in the Senate. On May 9, 2012, President Obama made US History when he told ABC News, “I think same sex couples should be able to get married.” Obama was reelected for a second term in November, 2012. In recent polls, about 70 percent of voters under the age of 30 support same-sex marriage. It would be a major step forward for our country in ensuring all citizens have equal rights and no one is discriminated against based on things such as race, gender, religion, sexual preference, disability, and other factors that don’t determine a person’s self-worth and contribution to society. One issue that people have with same sex marriage is parenting.…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays