Preview

The Disadvantages of Nuclear Technology Outweigh the Benefits

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
846 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Disadvantages of Nuclear Technology Outweigh the Benefits
Topic: The disadvantages of nuclear technology outweigh the benefits

With the development of technology , a considerable number of nuclear stations have built up throughout the world .The statistics on this issue that about more than 30 countries have nuclear stations or use them to generate power such as the USA, Canada, German, the UK and China. On the one hand, these countries obtain huge benefit of nuclear technology, but on the other hand, some pollution, cost expense and health problems are becoming seriously. From my point of view, the disadvantages of nuclear technology outweigh the benefits.

Firstly, nuclear technology tends to give rise to a vast amount of waste. Radioactive waste is the most significant pollution. A number of exporters who works in the department of environment mentioned it is very difficult to collect or dispose the kind of waste because the technology have not very efficient .There is no doubt that the pollution is spreading in the air or water .Also, all of steps of the nuclear fuel cycle manufacture a large percentage of ionizing radiation and uranium which involve many steps to dispose of them Each step involves separate facilities throughout the U.S. poisoning communities with radioactive and chemical pollution (mostly in western and mid-western states)(Nuclear,2008).In the last 45 years,the fission reactions at nuclear power plants had a huge number of waste in the USA(Nuclear,2008).So, if more and more counties will continue to construe the nuclear technology, the pollution of the world will become more serious. It is very irresponsible for the next generations.

Secondly, nuclear technology is harmful to people’s health. Living near a nuclear facility can increase human beings rate of death from breast cancer. A lot of facility release some toxic chemicals which will last more than billions of years including advanced level nuclear power stations. According to the country-wide research in the USA among 268 nations

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As everyone knows, nuclear energy can release nuclear radiation which can kill human’s cells and serious radiation can cause death. Furthermore, radiation can result in genetic variation. Radiation also has nuclear residue. It is hard to clear, may be more than 50 years can disappear. Such as Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, now is a ghost town, no one can live in there because of the radiation residue.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power does not put out green house gasses, nuclear power does not pollute our water, and unlike some people believe nuclear power does not release toxic gasses into the air. Some people believe that it produces toxic gases into the air because they see the white clouds that come out of the top of the power plant cooling towers, but in fact those white clouds are actually just the water vapor that has been used to cool the systems, it is not toxic and therefore does not pollute the air. Nuclear energy uses either plutonium or uranium, depending on the type of the reactor. Nuclear reactors produce less waste than any other type of energy source. One pound of plutonium can produce the same amount of energy as 50,000 barrels of oil. The number of deaths caused by coal powered plants is about 24,000 a year. There were only 56 direct deaths caused by the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. Fukushima had no direct deaths, and the only other reported deaths were of the 3 men who were testing a portable reactor in Arco, Idaho. Arco was also the very first city in the world to be powered by nuclear…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people think that nuclear power can provide low-cost energy which can easily substitute oil and the other common sources of energy. In addition to this, nuclear weapons are considered the only instrument which can make possible the maintenance of word peace. The nuclear problem is complex and difficult to analyze without any kind of prejudices. First of all, it is true that nuclear power can provide a huge amount of energy to every city in the world, but we also should consider…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lat1 Task 2

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to McGovern, there are numerous health risks connected to nuclear energy and the exposure of human cells to its radiations. This is a critical aspect in the context of health and other provisions regarding this article. The entire paper discusses more on the aspects of technology and its devastating effects on health. It is vital to agree that technology has revolutionized the entire sectors of economy, health, and social aspects; nonetheless, nuclear energy has impacts that cannot be contained in the health contexts. Numerous strategies are required in order to curb the menace even there is need to embrace such technologies. This article takes a look at the health risks related to the use of nuclear energy and the importance of understanding these risks. This article acknowledges the fact that nuclear energy may have both positive and negative impacts on individual’s health. However, the only positive impact on health which is highlighted in this article is the fact that nuclear energy can be used to produce electricity which is important in maintaining and developing economies (McGovern M. H. and Tiwari J. (2009). the article acknowledges the fact that the positive impacts of nuclear technology may be dwarfed and become insignificant by the extent of the negatives associated with nuclear energy. the radiological and non-radiological risks posed with nuclear mishaps or misuse of nuclear facilities is also discussed. according to the article, the dangers of exposure to high dosages to radiation is illustrated using the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986 (McGovern & Tiwari, 2009).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear energy leads to an unsafe, unstable and unclean environment. The producing of nuclear energy can lead to both good and bad things, but two thing that come with producing nuclear energy are the high dangers and expenses. Many risks and high dangers of producing nuclear energy are any where from health issues to major meltdowns of nuclear plants. Expenses of nuclear energy plants are very expensive to build and to sustain them through the years. Renewable energy is a safer option for the environment and the economy, with no chances of major melt downs and expenses.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Greenpeace argues that there is nothing ‘peaceful’ about the nuclear industry. It is harmful to the environment as well as all living creatures. The Nuclear Age began in 1945 and ever since Greenpeace began, they have been trying to fight it. There has been much progress made. In 2000 nuclear powerful was discredited during the UN Climate Change talks. In 2001 the UN Sustainability Development Conference declared nuclear as an unsustainable technology.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many reasons why nuclear energy is bad, and good. But my stance on it is that nuclear energy is bad. Here are 3 reasons why. First, there might be an accident accessing nuclear power plants, causing great danger to everyone and the area. Second, if resources dwindle, the cost of making plants might increase in prices. Third,…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Plants

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The question of whether the U.S. should have nuclear power plants is very controversial. There are two sides that one can take; however, both sides have their own share of problems. If you chose to not have nuclear plants, then eventually all natural resources will run out. The oil supply will run out relatively soon, and all other sources will run out too. The natural resources that we have now are still harmful to the earth however. The gas which we use for our cars pollutes the air and considering the amount of cars the are driven each day, it is ripping apart the o-zone layer. However, if the U.S. does decide to use nuclear plants, then there is a great danger of toxic waste invading our rivers, and also the chance of a spill similar to Chernobyl. As we saw in the Chernobyl video, there is great danger when using nuclear energy. If this were to happen is the United States, the risk of mortality is much higher because the area's in which there would be a plant such as a big city are very densely populated. Because of these facts, I do not think that the U.S. should renew its efforts to develop more nuclear plants.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result, if nuclear weapons were widely used, you cannot imagine the consequences. For instance, during the World War 2, Hiroshima was an important Japanese military centre with a population of almost 300,000. On August 6, 1945, this city was destroyed by a single atomic bomb named “Little Boy” and some 70,000 people died in the first seconds. Moreover, it is estimated that more than 200,000 people died in the following 5 years due to cancer and other long-term diseases.(F. G. Gosling) Furthermore, nuclear power stations would be perfect targets for terrorists. Although security is emphasized in these places, no nuclear power plants in the world could survive in an attack like 9/11 in New York. The consequences of such an attack could be catastrophic for the world. (Rose…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along with the advantages of nuclear power, there are also some disadvantages, which we must consider. These may have a very negative effect on our future and other generations to come.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By building nuclear reactors which contains the nuclei, the large of energy released from it creates steam which drives machines to generate electric power. Nuclear energy is capable of producing energy equivalent to 3 million pounds of coal from 1 pound of uranium. however, after the nuclear plant disasters that happened in Chernobyl in Ukraine and Fukushima in Japan led people to a controversy on nuclear energy and questions such as whether nuclear energy and reactors can solve the world’s energy issues or does it pose to much of a risk and should be taken out as a choice of energy. After looking through the issue more, I have came up with the question: To what extent do the benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the possible risks it has on the environment? After doing research, my position in this controversy is pro nuclear. I believe that the benefits of nuclear energy are higher than the threats and after looking at statistics, it had shown that other sources of energy causes the same or more damage to our environment with less good…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1.0 Nuclear energy bring more harm than benefits as it lacks of safety monitoring, it affects the humans health and lastly it affects the environment and ecosystem…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the creation of Nuclear weapons, potentially the worst thing that has happened to humanity in it's history, came something with a lot of potential to do good. Nuclear energy is both very clean and very efficient. However there have been many tragic accidents regarding Nuclear energy. Chernobyl is the most notable disaster, currently however we are in the middle of a potential disaster unfolding at Japan's Fukushima Nuclear Facility. Nuclear Energy is relatively safe and incredibly efficient and clean, however when tragedy strikes, it strikes hard.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays