In Lumbricus terrestris
Abstract
The difference in soil pH weighs a heavy measure on the appearance of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris in different areas of soil. A highly acidic or highly alkaline soil may be the underlying reason for the absence of this earthworm in certain areas where pH plays a large role. In this experiment, soil pH was altered with Miracida soil acidifier and Agricultural Limestonea soil correctional for acidic soil. This was done to test the effects pH would have on the living conditions of Lumbricus terrestris over a twenty-one day period. The experiment shows the fluctuation of numbers on a daily and weekly basis verifying the theory that the earthworm prefers a soil with a pH between 6.0 and 7.0. In summary, this paper provides a three week synopsis of a closed experiment showing the preference of soil pH for the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris.
KEY WORDS: Lumbricus terrestris, earthworm, soil, pH, acid, alkaline, limestone, Miracid, Agricultural Limestone, living condition
Introduction
Many earthworm species in North America existing today actually originated from Europe (Minard). One of these earthworms is known as Lumbricus terrestris, or the Night crawler. According to the University of California, the Night Crawler is of Palaearctic Origin and can grow to sizes from 90mm x 6mm to 300mm x 10mm. Lumbricus terrestris has a dark anterior with a lighter posterior. Contrary to most belief, the earthworm is not a symmetrical tube-like organism. This is because it has no proper top or bottom and in Lumbricus terrestris, the posterior end has the ability to flatten. The life span of this particular earthworm can be anywhere from 2.5 to 6 years, maturing around day 350 (University of California). Lumbricus terrestris is common in cultivated soils where is builds vertical living tubes as deep as two meters into the subsoil (Graff). Lumbricus terrestris are detrivorous which means
Cited: Barendregt, A., Cornelis A. M. Van Gestal, Joop L. M. Hermens, Leon Van Der Wal, Roel H. L. J. Fleuren, Theo L. Sinnige, and Tjalling Jager. 2004. Solid-Phase Microextraction to Predict Bioavailability and Accumulation of Organic Micropollutants in Terrestrial Organisms after Exposure to a Field-Contaminated Soil. Environmental Science and Technology 38: 4842-4848. Fleuren, R. H. J., Elbert A. Hogendoorn, Gert De Korte, and Tjalling Jager. 2003. Elucidating the Routes of Exposure for Organic Chemicals in the Earthworm, Eisenia Andrei (Oligcharta). Environmental Science and Technology 37: 3399- 3404. Garden Helper, The. 1999. http://www.thegardenhelper.com/acidsoil.html. Georgiev, O., A. John Morgan, Peter Kille, and Stephen R. Stürzenbaum. 2004. Cadmium Detoxification in Earthworms: From Genes to Cells. Environmental Science and Technology 38: 6283-6289. Graff, O. 1967. About the Dislocation into the Subsoil of Nutrient Elements through the Activity of Earthworms. LANDWIRT FORSCH 20 (2-3): 117-127. Minard, A. 2003. Researchers build a case for earthworm 's slimy reputation. New York Times 153, no. 52650. University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program. http://www.sarep.ucdavis.edu/worms/profile6.htm. Worm Man 's Worm Farm. 2005. wormman.com. http://www.wormman.com/ph_of_your_soil_and_worm_bed.cfm.