The documentary was made to push society into looking at themselves and ask questions like, Why poverty still exists? Ask if the true stem of poverty is from deliberate orchestration since the colonial ages which has evolved into our modern ways, this means wealthy nations exploit the poor. The people living in and fighting against this harsh poverty still have to answer to colonialism and its deceiving background of consequences, e.g. free markets, debt, land grab, exploitation of natural resources. The colonial powers were grand manipulators, and they could easily find countries with no government were in which the powers could use there own governments legal system to take land. The law states that land that does not have a …show more content…
There was little lacking in this film because they pretty much cover the main topics and go into immense detail on the struggle that poverty is bringing to these nations. I thought that the film might have been missing an entertainment aspect to it, something that might have brought in a wider range of audiences and something that would really keep the viewer intrigued throughout the film. There is also evidence that some of the information within the documentary is incorrect, for example Brazil does not have 50 million people starving but 13 million, as data from 2004 shows. Other than a couple hiccups hear and there, there is nothing much lacking within this