If the Europeans and Japanese were similar in any aspect, it was in the way their feudal societies worked. Both Japan and Western Europe followed a set of standards that were set by the very definition of feudalism, but when it came to the social consequences of their systems, their similarities began to dissipate. As the definition of feudalism states, both Japan and Western Europe had a mutually beneficial system that involved two people: a lord (or daimyo) and a vassal (or samurai). In this mutualistic society, the nobility traded land) called fief and shugo in Europe and Japan respectively) and protection in exchange for loyalty and military service. From that point the societies go in different directions
If the Europeans and Japanese were similar in any aspect, it was in the way their feudal societies worked. Both Japan and Western Europe followed a set of standards that were set by the very definition of feudalism, but when it came to the social consequences of their systems, their similarities began to dissipate. As the definition of feudalism states, both Japan and Western Europe had a mutually beneficial system that involved two people: a lord (or daimyo) and a vassal (or samurai). In this mutualistic society, the nobility traded land) called fief and shugo in Europe and Japan respectively) and protection in exchange for loyalty and military service. From that point the societies go in different directions