In the article it seems that Poland is a guilty bystander. Poles were guilty of inaction. To Blonski there was so much more that the Poles could have done and did not. The Poles could had embraced the Polish Jews and helped to hide them. But in the defense of the Poles, fear of backlash for resistance is an understandable reaction. But the argument by Blonski is not about claiming that they did not suffer and were not at all victims, but rather that victim is not their only identity and there is Polish responsibility. Jews were the primary targets to be sent to the concentration and extermination camps. It is the Polish relationship with the Jewish population that Blonski asserts is the reason that the effects of the Holocaust were so much greater in Poland. This indicates that there was something about Poland that allowed for this to
In the article it seems that Poland is a guilty bystander. Poles were guilty of inaction. To Blonski there was so much more that the Poles could have done and did not. The Poles could had embraced the Polish Jews and helped to hide them. But in the defense of the Poles, fear of backlash for resistance is an understandable reaction. But the argument by Blonski is not about claiming that they did not suffer and were not at all victims, but rather that victim is not their only identity and there is Polish responsibility. Jews were the primary targets to be sent to the concentration and extermination camps. It is the Polish relationship with the Jewish population that Blonski asserts is the reason that the effects of the Holocaust were so much greater in Poland. This indicates that there was something about Poland that allowed for this to