The prevalence of obesity and overweight is increasing rapidly in the United States.1 Recent public health campaigns have focused on raising people's awareness of the health implications of obesity and suggest steps that individuals may take to decrease their risk of obesity, such as increasing physical activity and changing nutritional habits.2,3 Population-level data indicate, however, that most people have not changed their lifestyles.4,5 It is possible that individuals may need additional motivators to initiate weight gain prevention and weight loss. The Health Belief Model offers some potential explanation for the mechanisms underlying behavior change. The model is based on six components: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity,…
Heart failure is a serious public health in the United States, causing chronic illness and often mortality (Boghianimoghadam, 53). The Health Belief Model (HBM), developed by is the framework of choice for this project. It will describe one’s health behavior modification and act as a foundation of health education. The model was created in the 1950s by sociologists who wanted to analyze why people declined to participate in preventive health behaviors (Boghianimoghadam,53). HBM addresses the relationship between a person’s beliefs and behaviors. It offered a way to understand and predict how clients would behave in relation to their health and how they would comply with health care therapies. There are six concepts…
the Health Belief Model. “The emerging chronic disease epidemic poses both a threat to the public’s health and a challenge to public health practice.” (Resnick & Siegel, 2013, p.3) Based on this epidemic, it is crucial for researchers to conduct interventions that will encourage people to take action and create behavioral changes in order to live healthier…
(Hingson et al., 2009) Furthermore, 400,000 students between the ages of 18 and 24 had unprotected sex, and more than 100,000 students report having been too intoxicated to know if they consented to having sex. These shocking statistics lead campuses to ban the use of alcohol on their campuses. Except, eliminating drinking on college campuses is unrealistic because college students, like high school students, are subjected to strong social pressures to drink. Moderation is a more realistic goal for college students to avoid the problems of alcohol abuse (Krohn, 2000). America tried, during its history, to ban alcohol. This brilliant idea was known as prohibition. Prohibition did not prevent drinking, and dry campuses won’t prevent drinking. Therefore, drinking is a reality for college student, and it’s going to happen. Teaching students to make better choices about alcohol can prevent excessive drinking and the social problems that come along with it, such as academic problems, sexual assault, suicide attempts and alcohol abuse. The whole point of graduating college is to earn an education, not develop an alcohol addiction. Colleges can’t ignore or avoid the problems of drinking by having a dry campus policy. Drinking happens, and kids need to be educated on how to be able to deal with…
Currently, there are numerous advertisements about smoking, drug use, and eating disorders. However, there are very few health campaigns about sexual health. This is most likely due to the stereotypical associations that go along with discussing sex, and how the American culture portrays talking about sex. Sex in the United States is not an open and inviting topic among the American culture. This causes problems because young adults don’t have the resources they need to become educated on sexual health. Colleges and Universities can do a lot to improve this problem by creating health campaigns focused on sexual health. This would increase the students’ view of the importance of the topic, and may even find the topic relevant to their own lives. Making them aware of the information may not only be resourceful to them, but help their peers as…
If children and adolescents are educated about sex practices at too young of an age it can encourage them to partake in sexual activities prematurely. This can result in teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases and negative mental health or low self-esteem. If students are educated about sex with abstinence based program it can reduce the amount of teen pregnancies that occur. For example, Project IMPPACT in New York City “focuses on the importance of abstaining from sexual intercourse” (Lieberman, Gray, Wier, Fiorention, & Maloney, 2000). This program discovered that “Lower rates of adolescent sexual activity are associated with having parents who demonstrate a combination of traditional attitudes toward sexual behavior and effective communication practices” (Lieberman et al, 2000).…
In recent years, the question of whether schools should teach abstinence only programs or comprehensive sex education has been debated rigorously. Through his 2013 published piece, “Educating for Character in the Sexual Domain”, author Thomas Lickona focuses on the benefits of abstinence only programs. He uses the argument that abstinence creates character in today’s youth and cites multiple sources that support his viewpoint. On the other side of the discussion, authors of the article “Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S.”, David Hall and Kathrin Stanger-Hall address the lack of efficiency abstinence only programs provide. Published in 2011, their article relies heavily on…
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the average teenager engages in sexual intercourse by the age of seventeen, but do not marry until the mid-twenties (citation). This means that young adults are at an increased risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections for nearly ten years or longer. The numbers of students engaging in sexual activity of ages thirteen to twenty-four continues to grow each year, as does the number of unplanned pregnancies and HIV infections due to not being fully educated about the risks. Today, the duty of educating students and teenagers about sexual intercourse and the risks involved is left to the government and public school system. Abstinence education programs in public…
Abstinence only goal is to prevent teens from sexual intercourse. They used tactics like religion and traditional beliefs to send the message that expressing sexual behavior brings shame to everyone around them (Krueger). Those programs do not teach teens about protection nor ways for them to be in control of their health. Out of the 13 programs funded by the government, only 2 have correct information about protection and prevention (Krueger). Also, only abstinence program’s states have a higher teen pregnancy than states whom teach a variety of sexual education programs. In southern states, where abstinence is only focused on, there are ~20% more births in southern states compared to northern states (Krueger) . Also, abstinence taught teens were more likely to not wear protection and higher chances to contract STDs (Krueger). There needs to be updated sex education programs in high schools in the united…
(1998, July 10). Encouraging teen abstinence. The CQ Researcher Online, 8. Retrieved March 18, 2004, from http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher…
The model that best aligns with the Hispanic and Latino community would be the Health Belief Model. The Health Belief Model centers around four key components 1) Perceived Susceptibility 2) Perceived Benefits 3) Perceived Severity 4) Perceived Barriers which are all things that ultimately shapes one’s behavior.…
Comprehensive Sexual Education What has happened to today’s society that we are opposed to condoms because they might entice sex? When has allowing our youth to practice unsafe sex over safe sex been okay? We often think because we supply kids with condoms, birth control, and talks, that we are giving them permission to have sex, when in fact we are merely trying to protect them from STDs and pregnancy. We do not need to scare kids, but we do need to provide them with information about safe sex practices and what can happen if they do plan to explore their sexual urge. Facts are the most important thing we can offer those select few of youth who wish to engage in sex. Since when has providing information been a bad thing? Shouldn’t the youth know what they are doing and what can happen before they do it? Most schools and education environments that do encourage any sort of sexual education, teach kids to “just say no”. The one main problem with this “abstinence only” education is that it denies those who do say “yes” information, instead of providing other acceptable options other than abstinence. Throughout time, ratings have shown that teaching the abstinence only education doesn’t affect the rates at which teenagers decide to have sex. Though comprehensive sex education doesn’t stop kids from having sex, it does however teach them how to participate in safe sex. Teenagers in today’s society are not stupid. When they are told by teachers that abstinence is the only way that they will not get a STD, they know they are being lied to or misled. Giving teenagers’ information about the risks of different types of sexual behavior can help them make informed decisions about sex. The most effective programs are not the ones that try to divert teens from sex completely but rather the ones that try to steer teens away from dangerous sexual behaviors. Most teens who do not have the correct information on risky sexual behaviors veer away from vaginal intercourse, and…
Because of these programs many girls feel as though sex makes them worthless to others if they are no longer virgins. The abstinence-only programs use scare tactics to prevent sexual activity in teen instead of teaching them how to be safe. Programs like this in the public school system should not be created to make students feel worthless. Suicide is already an epidemic among teenagers because they feel as though they are not good enough. How are abstinence-only programs with scare tactics and shaming going to help the students that already feel like they made a huge mistake in the first place? Sex education programs, however, not only teach how to have safe sex, but also the effects sex can have on you mentally and physically. These programs teach stedents “the importance of attaining self-sufficiency before engaging in sexual activity” (DeWitt) so students know that they have to know themselves and be confidence in themselves before taking such a big step at an early…
According to source number two, a study shows that abstinence pledge programs are dramatically effective in reducing sexual activity among teens in grades 7-12. By all means, I do not agree with the previous statement, whatsoever. Reading that honestly amazes me. If studies show that the pledges actually work, then why do we have millions of teens engaging in sexual intercourse? Getting pregnant? Contracting sexually transmitted diseases? That does not make any sense. If they were effective, we would have millions of teens refraining from sex, not getting…
The government and schools must now step in and place more effective abstinence programs to ensure that students are bombarded by information on the negative effects of sex. As Timken High shows us, many states have pitiful curriculums that are currently set. It does not make any logical sense to keep inadequate courses in the schools if they do not work! I thought schools and the government were responsible for teaching students information that would help them succeed in modern society and make smart decisions. By keeping these ineffective programs, it sends an implied message that the educational bodies simply do not care. Instead of working to ensure the achievement of a goal, they are, in some respect, condoning premarital sex. Currently in the state of California, there is a required sexual education class that all high school students must take before graduating. The program in California as well as that in Ohio is relatively similar in many respects. While not yet proven to be ineffective, the situation in Ohio and Timken High should be enough to compel education directors to alter the current curriculum. With schools being such an integral part in students' lives, schools must become a front runner in the battle against high school pregnancies. It is definitely a bold charge, yet essential, for schools' are held accountable for doing what is best for their…