Preview

THE HERMANSONS

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
846 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
THE HERMANSONS
THE HERMANSONS
A THOUGHTFUL medical ethicist, Renee Fox, has referred to the law as one of society's ``ultimate moral grids,'' the forum where we wrestle as a people with our deepest moral concerns. Moral concern - on both sides - was at the heart of the recent trial of William and Christine Hermanson, Florida parents who lost a much-loved daughter and now face criminal penalties because, as Christian Scientists, they turned for help to their denomination's longstanding practice of Christian healing rather than to medical care.
We can't pretend to be impartial. The Hermansons are members of the church that publishes this newspaper. They are our brethren. It is painful to think of them being condemned and punished for their religious convictions - almost as painful as it was to learn of Amy Hermanson's unexpected death in 1986.
We do not question the earnestness or conscience of the jurors who, confronted by the tragedy of a child's death, rendered a verdict of guilty. Nor do we question the motives of the prosecutors, though their present demand for a prison sentence frankly seems gratuitous and cruel.
The verdict leaves basic moral questions unanswered, however.
Are the Hermansons guilty because they chose a mode of healing rooted in their deep sense of God's love, or because of the results of that choice in this situation?
If the former, are the many Christian Scientists who have made the same choice in equally serious situations, but whose children have been healed, also guilty? If the latter, why aren't parents who turn to physicians in good faith prosecuted when their choice has an equally tragic result?
Obviously, we aren't proposing such prosecutions, which would do the same kind of injustice to others as has been done to the Hermansons. We are simply pointing out that the moral distinction between a tragedy and a crime has been blurred in this case. To be consistent (as several commentators have pointed out), the guilt ascribed to these parents would have

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This case set forth the precedent that juries, not the judge, will have the ability to exercise their discretion when deciding aggravating factors which could lead to the enforcement of the death…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Critique

    • 584 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Justice was served as well as it could be. I am sure the boys will have horrible memories of their time in that home and it will forever haunt them. The amount of money they received probably did not make them feel any…

    • 584 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of the fifteen-year-old Rob Jr., the Church of Devine Light was at fault will be held responsible for the actions of Tom Marsden, an employee of the church, under strict liability. Rob’s parents, Rob Sr. and Bunny, could file charges against Tom Marsden and the Church of Devine Light for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I personally think that Jury number 9 does not fully fulfil the standards of thinking. Based from the readings the standards of thinking “Whenever we think there is always a purpose, within a point of view, based on assumptions, leading to implications and consequences. We use data, facts, and experiences to make inferences and judgments, based on concepts and theories to answer a question or solve a problem.” Juror number 9 obviously did not fulfil these standards. One thing that I noticed about this juror is that when he decided to change sides he only did this for the sake of giving Henry Fonda a breather. He only did this because he thinks that the men inside the room are being too harsh on the boy and o Henry Fonda. This old man did not have a specific purpose towards the case. It would be acceptable that if he changed sides because he doubted the case but he didn’t.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Andrea Yates

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Andrea Yates was found guilty for drowning her five children in a bath tub in their house in Houston on the morning of June 20th of 2001. She called the Houston Police Department after committing this evil act who arrived at the scene and took Yates in custody and questioned her. She revealed the details of how she drowned her children one by one and put them in their beds and left her six-month old daughter floating dead in the bath tub before she drowned her last child who was seven years old. She was not able to answer why she had done this every time asked by the officer. She was later put on anti-depressants which resulted in her revealing why she had done so. She believed that she was trying to send them to God in their "innocent years" before they committed any sins. It would send them in heaven. She said "they did not do thing God likes" in her interview with the psychiatrist. She said they did silly things. Her lawyer plead not guilty on basis of insanity defense.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fault should not fall on any one party, but on how each party treated each other. They treated each other with ignorance and noncompliance without acknowledging others’ beliefs or traditions. If the fault were to fall an anyone, it should fall on both parties because the doctors failed to acknowledge the Lees beliefs, and the Lees failed to acknowledge the doctors’ traditions. In a place where a child’s life is at danger, people should not be disagreeing on what to do because it only makes it harder to choose what to do for the child. Instead, they should be trying to communicate and come to a consensus with each other so that they understand each other’s intentions and find a common…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American justice system is intended to be fair and unbiased. It is founded on the ideal that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty, and ensures the duty of proving a dispute charge rests with the prosecution. However this system has inevitable flaws as every individual’s beliefs, values and morals are affected by their own experiences and factors. While such factors could potentially be the systems weaknesses, they could also be its biggest strength bringing experience and understanding to the courtrooms. It is this contradiction that Reginald Rose aims to explore through his portrayal of jurors in his play “Twelve Angry Men.’ The play presents the possibility that some jurors are driven by prejudice, while others self-interest motives can jeopardize the rights of the defendant through aspirations to speed up the case. However Rose portrays a voice of reason through the ethical juror 8 and the unbigoted juror 11, these jurors help to represent Rose’s view that a fair trial can be held in a jury room full of flawed human characters that symbolize the spectrum of society.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thousands of people have watched Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills and come away convinced that Echols, Baldwin and Misskelley were victims of a gross miscarriage of justice. Many then readDevil’s Knot: The True Story of the West Memphis Three by Mara Leveritt, watched Paradise Lost 2, browsed some “Free the WM3″ websites, heard a celebrity proclaiming the WM3′s innocence, or saw a TV documentary proclaiming their innocence, and became further convinced. When I first saw Paradise Lost, I figured the three teenagers had to be innocent. Maybe you did too.…

    • 532 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gentlemen of the jury, we have gathered to decide the fate of a boy, a life or death decision. This is a responsibility that must not be taken lightly, a guilty child born into a corrupt system shouldn’t be culled due to the ignorance and failure to achieve the justice he deserves. This boy, who is in good health, and should live to a good age, will come to a permanent end. In my many years of law it has never been clearer to me the suspect has been falsely accused. It is your duty as the jury, the established law that is supposed to keep the innocent out of jail, to decide the fate of an innocent man.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 3rd juror is the most outspoken about the 'guilt' of the teenager. As the play goes along it is revealed he has a personal connection with what has happened, he feels anger towards his own son, an anger which he has transferred onto the accused. A key moment for the third juror is when he finally changes his vote to ‘not guilty’ which is when he is reminded by the 8th juror “It’s not your boy. He’s somebody else’”, followed by the 4th juror stating “let him live”. Right up to this point, the third juror was committed to his ‘guilty’ vote. By juror 3 allowing his emotional baggage to enter the jury room with him it is clear that from the beginning of the play, his personal experience with his son were physiologically too powerful for him to be able to make the right verdict for the defendant.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It’s a scary but a true reality that prejudice has the power to overshadow the facts and evidence, which can prevent jurors from seeing the truth. From the start of the play, juror 4 votes the defendant guilty of murder, not based on facts but entirely based on prejudice and stereotyping the defendant. The fact that the defendant “was born in a slum” (p.g 12) and the generalisation from the outside world: “Children from slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society.” (p.g 12) convince juror 4 that the defendant must be guilty. Because of prejudice, he cannot see the details like the defendant’s birthplace and circumstances may potentially be used to prove that he does not have a strong motive. As pointed out by the 8th Juror, the defendant was raised in a slum and had “been hit so many times” (p.g 11) that a few slaps from his father cannot make the defendant commit patricide. Therefore, the defendant does not have a strong motive. When we compare juror 8 and juror4’s reasoning, we can see that prejudice and stereotyping can veil the truth of the case and hide it from jurors and consequently prevent them from seeing the truth. However, juror 4 is only prejudiced at the start of…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rose often demonstrates throughout the course of ‘Twelve Angry Men’ that reason needs to overrule emotion if important decisions need to be made, however some emotion is proven to be good for the discussion of the court case. The Jurors own prejudice often cloud their judgment and reason is the only way a decision can be reached fairly. Rose demonstrates through the characterization of several Jurors that people should care about the case, and anger can sometimes be a good motivator although it has its difficulties.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juror #3 came into this trial with a moral dilemma long before hearing the facts of the case. Given his past experiences, he would feel more inclined to vote guilty as to punish and make an example of this boy so that other kids would think twice. In this case if the jury decided on a guilty verdict, the defendant would be put to death. People might make rash decisions based…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When the Judge announced the verdict “Guilty” there was a slight murmur in the court room as was expected. Then the Judge began to announce the sentence “Life in prison without the possibility of parole”, the words cutting through the air like an arrow through a paper target. The courtroom was an arena of mixed feelings, half cheering in a celebratory manner, the other half crying and shouting in disbelief. Someone’s 13 year old son was going to prison for the rest of his life without any chance of parole. Children should never be sentenced to life without parole, making the sentence in itself a death penalty for a juvenile.…

    • 3430 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics