Preview

The Importance Of Supreme Court Justice In American Politics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
642 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of Supreme Court Justice In American Politics
The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an rare event of major significance in American politics. Each appointment is significant because of the large amount of judicial power the Supreme Court exercises. Appointments are scarce, and some presidents may not even have to deal with a vacancy on the Court. The Constitution allow helps protect the Court’s independence from the President and Congress. When there is a vacancy in the Supreme Court, there are decisions that have to be made to fill that seat.
The procedure for appointing a Justice is worded in the Constitution, but only by a few words. The “Appointments Clause” states that the President has the power to nominate, and with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoint judges of the Supreme Court. Since the Constitution doesn’t specifically explain the appointment process, changes have been made to fit our new government. The one aspect that has stayed the same is the sharing of power
…show more content…
The American people nominated President Obama, so he should pick the candidate for the new Supreme Court Justice. The President should take into consideration what the American people want and what will get approved by the Senate. The President could allow the people to vote between two candidates that he picks. The future of the Supreme Court lays in the hands of President Obama. The majority of the Supreme Court is conservative and if a liberal judge is appointed, there could be a different view in the Supreme Court. My own political bias does influence this advice. Conservatives believe that since the justice who died was a conservative, a conservative should take his place. Being a moderate helps to see both sides of the issue. If this was happening to a liberal, they could act in the same way. The president should fulfill his duty and nominate a justice to fill Scalia’s spot, but the issue is about what party the justice will be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Before the election, if President Obama was not able to get the Senate to approve his United States Supreme Court applicant, the next president would potentially be responsible for filling the vacant spots on the court over the term due to possible retirements and deaths. If a Republican is elected president, the court could continue to issue decisions that are favorable to conservatives in the many cases it hears. If a Democrat is elected president, the court could shift towards a more liberal direction. How the new president forms the court will differ depending on which party controls the Senate after the…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution vested immense power in the judicial branch of the government. Over the years, the highest Court of the land, the United States Supreme Court, has ruled on a multitude of cases, making new laws and setting precedence. The American people deem the judicial body supreme and, perhaps irrationally, trust they will interpret the Constitution more accurately and ethically compared to the executive and legislative branches. However, decisions of the courts are not purely legal, but rather a synthesis of attitudinal, legal, and strategic processes.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Constitution was created, some topics were explained in great detail, yet some were explained very vaguely causing many disputes over how certain topics should be dealt with. In Article III, it states how the Judicial Branch works. It decides what the court bases their decisions on. In Article II of the U.S. Constitution it states how a justice must be replaced, who picks the new justice, which is the president, yet there is no time frame stated on how long it must take to pick a new justice. The president of the United States is to pick the new justice and the Senate confirms it. After a sudden death to Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia, the decision must be made to pick a new justice now or to allow the new…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, a major principal characteristic of the Roberts Court is over turning congressional and state legislation in order to achieve conservative goals. The Roberts court is finding laws unconstitutional and reversing precedent, two measures of activism. But the ideological direction of the court’s activism has undergone a marked change toward conservative results. The Roberts Court issued conservative decisions 58% of the time in its first 5 years throughout all cases. The Burger and Rehnquist courts issued conservative decisions 55% and the lowest from the Warren courts, which issued conservative decisions only 34% of the time. The incline in conservative decisions gives evidence that there is a growing number of people who favour this strict and traditional form of court rulings and decision making as opposed to Roberts immediate predecessors who display a more modern and loose approach to the US political system…

    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pros of lifetime of judges in the Supreme Court are that they do not have to worry about the political pressure or to contribute with money for any political campaign. “The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is to assure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch”. (laws, n.d.). In addition, there are judges in the Supreme Court that worries about make a fair system…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At no time in this century was the devotion to that principle more vigorously evoked than in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt introduced a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. The conflict set off by the President's plan is more understandable when viewed in the historical context of expanding judicial power as well as in the contemporary context of pro- and anti-New Deal politics.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the years 1952 to 1969 Earl Warren was selected as President of the Supreme court. The Warren Court issued multiple rulings that were challenged in the context of criminal investigations. Warren along with seventeen members in court played an important role in some decisions that were approved. These decisions affected the change of a more conservative court. The Warren Court showed a more liberal outlook. Among these judges were some who were firm and responsible in the decisions for their opinions. To conclude, to this day the Supreme Court has a very important role in the American legal system and this is due to the term that their decisions become law, affecting the following cases throughout the…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Jefferson took office in 1801 the republicans controlled both the Executive and the Legislative branch, the Judicial Branch on the other hand was still largely controlled by the Federalists. John Adams knew this was coming so he wanted to make sure the federalists keep the Judicial branch, he made the Judiciary Act of 1801, where Adams assigned new justices to the supreme court every night until the day of Jefferson’s Inauguration. These legal documents were called “midnight appointments” that sat on the president’s desk when Jefferson took office so, the supreme court could not do anything about them. Jefferson took the easy choice and kept these documents from the reach of the supreme court by handing them to Madison, and even though…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appointing the men to be Justices of the Piece was with in Adams constitutional rights as president. John Marshall says “ The constitution is either a superior paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts and, like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it. If the former part of the alternative be true, then…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having our Supreme Court Justice serving on the bench for life can have pros and cons. Although, most of our fellows americans seem to have more drawbacks about our Supreme Court of Justice life tenure position. With this in mind, let me first mention the pros…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Antonin Scalia is an American Associate Justice in the United States Supreme Court. He was appointed by President Ronald Regan in September 26, 1986 and preceded by William Rehnquist. He also sits as the longest serving justice on the court. Justice Scalia is well known for his dissents, where he uses a colorful style of writing when opposing his colleagues.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State Supreme Court was established through by the Constitution in Articles III of 1787 and gave it authority to hear certain appeals brought from the lower courts and the state courts. If necessary, the United State also has the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Life Tenure

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During their tenure, a Justice will be able to continue learning and understanding the law, so that in every situation they know what is constitutional and unconstitutional. Confucius once said, “Study the past if you would define the future.” The decisions of Supreme Court Justices have led to many new laws. However, those decisions are made by justices who have been doing that for a while. These Supreme Court Justices understand our past, the decisions, laws, and consequences, and know how to act upon that because of their prolonged tenure as justices. Under no circumstance does anybody just stop learning, so Justices will be ripe with knowledge until their time is done, they choose to step down, or are impeached. Therefore, Supreme Court Justices life tenure helps them understand and master their role in the Supreme…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court System Interview

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the United States Constitution was established, the founding fathers devised the core of the court system that is present in today’s society. The state and federal government each have a version of a Supreme Court which is typically led by a Chief Justice. The states level Supreme Court Justice governs the issues that pertains to the citizens within the respective state. These individuals will also take part in hearings or proceedings that impact of law of the state and hear constitutional cases with regards to the state. On the federal side, a Supreme Court Chief Justice will operates more on a national level, ruling over cases that such as states taking one another to court. The federal court has authority over anything to do with the United States Constitution and this paper will interview State Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore on the current issue of same-sex marriage that was recently passed for the state of Alabama.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays