Preview

The Importance Of The Electoral College

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1198 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of The Electoral College
The electoral college has continued to be a controversial topic for several years now. The electoral college is a process used in the presidential election. It was first proposed to Congress on December 9, 1803 (Twelfth Amendment). This means that the electoral college has been around for over two hundred years, yet some Americans still wonder if the electoral college is a fair system? A key factor in deciding if it is fair would be to understand why we have the electoral college and how it works. I have decided that the electoral college is not a fair system by analyzing alternate solutions and popular opinions from Americans.
First, we must know why the electoral college was created. It was established by the Founding Fathers of America
…show more content…
The electoral college is a process that runs in three phases. The first phase is the selection of who becomes the electors. The second phase takes place on election day. The third phase is the counting of the electoral votes, which determines who becomes the President and Vice President. Electors are usually chosen by the candidate and the match up with their political affiliation, but the state can also choose who becomes an elector. When you vote on election day, you are also voting for your electors. The electors are branched under a candidate and when the candidate wins one state, the electors for that Presidential candidate will send their electors to the meeting place to vote in the electoral college. A Certificate of Ascertainment is prepared by your governor, which is then sent to Congress to be document for that election. The certificate contains a list of all the electors who will vote in the electoral college for each candidate, and who won the presidency for your …show more content…
The creators of the electoral college were worried that the system might lead to the creation of many political parties. This is a problem we see today and has led to a battle between government power. For example, some Americans do not like the electoral college because they have less say over who becomes president. Previously, they had a list of three to five candidates on the ballot, now they only have two. Americans who associate with smaller political parties would like to have a chance to vote for their candidate. Others argue that the system should be replaced and that we should base election results solely on the popular vote. There have been cases where a candidate will win the popular vote, but will then lose in electoral votes. This is called a “wrong-winner.” A wrong-winner has happened in several instances, which is why some Americans wish to completely eliminate the electoral college. Another issue with the electoral college is the Unit Rule. The Unit Rule says that a candidate who does not win the majority in a state will receive no electoral votes. This goes back to the people having a larger say in the presidency. Critics believe that the rule makes a candidate unable to win the electoral college. Americans who disagree with the Unit Rule suggest that the electoral college should be modified so that both candidates have the chance to win through the electoral votes. Americans have also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ever since the constitution has been written, the president of the united states has been elected via the electoral college. Despite its long-time usage, the electoral college has many critics. Various people, wish for the president to be elected via a popular vote. While others, continue to be happy with usage of the electoral college. Others, simply are confused by the process of the electoral college all together. This leads to many political scientists to question if the electoral college is in fact effective, or if a popular vote would be better. However, both the popular vote and the electoral college have pros and cons.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critics argue that this system listens to the minority. In fact, it does not, this system discourages minority by using the winner take all rule. The winner take all rule promotes the idea that 49.9% of voters might get no representation. The Electoral should be changed to a proportional representation system, a method of voting by which political parties are given legislative representation in proportion to their popular vote. For example, in a state with 21 electors and 47% votes for Republicans and 53% for Democrats should get electors proportional to the popular vote, which would be 11 electors for Democrats and 9 for Republicans. This system would be much fair and would help represent both the minority and the majority of a certain state. Proportional elector system will not only encourage voter turnout, but also help accurately reflect the views of the public. Another reason why the Electoral College should be changed is because there is a theoretical possibility that a president loses the popular vote but still wins the electoral votes. As history shows, in the election of 1888 between Benjamin Harrison and Grover Cleveland, Benjamin Harrison won the election with plurality of the Electoral Vote (Harrison - 233 Electoral votes, Cleveland – 168 Electoral Votes),…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The electoral college in america should be abolished because it has major flaws, supports political inequality, and doesn’t support third party candidates. On top of the flaws that already exist in the electoral college the biggest flaws is what happens when there is a tie. In the case of a tie the decision of who gets to be president is cast in the House of Representatives. This would mean that every states essentially has one vote making “the single representative from Wyoming, representing 500,000 voters, [the same] as the 55 representatives from California, who represent 35 million voters”(Document F). This is important because if you just look at the numbers say Wyoming is the smallest states with 500,00 then any state with more voters that excess amount of voters basically don’t get a vote. In this case 34.5 million voters don’t get a vote. In addition to this example of political inequality, political inequality is seen in the number of electors each state receives. One example of this would be how a candidate could win the electoral vote by winning only 11 states, completely ignoring the Northeast United States(Document A). As a result of candidates only needing 11 states, bigger states have more influence than small states with only 3 votes making them less important. Yet even though 11 states have more influence than the others they really should have more because the electoral vote doesn’t truly represent population. For instance, in Illinois there are about 12 million people and they have 20 electors. Whereas in 12 smaller…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The electoral college was put in place by our founding fathers in the Constitution. The electoral college is a process that we undergo to elect our president. Every four years, American citizens vote for their preferred presidential candidate. Their votes, however, go to that state’s candidate electors, rather than straight towards the presidential election. Electors pledge to vote for the candidate and then vote for president based on the party they previously pledged to. Electors are chosen based on their loyalty to the party they belong to and American citizens indirectly vote for the elector who pledged their vote to a certain candidate. The electoral college was created for a purpose and is flawed…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The electoral college was created as a decisive conclusion to an election. If we did not have the electoral college we would have countless lawsuits for recounts of the popular vote in various states. There are many advantages of keeping the current system. The current system allows states to put trust in their electors to vote for the…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One argument in favor of the Electoral College I found most convincing was that it “contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support” to be elected president. I found this the most convincing because I think the Electoral College does a good job of ensuring each state and Washington, D.C. has a say in who is elected president. Even though some states have more electoral votes than others, the amount of votes are determined by population of state. The amount of electoral votes are determined by the number of House Representatives a state sends plus the two senators from that state. For example, the states that have the most electoral votes are California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, and New Jersey.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is the Electoral College a fair and true system? The Electoral College is the system in place to pick the next president of the United States. The issue with the Electoral College people think it is not fair because majority vote wins a whole state and it cancels like the rest of the votes. Every state has at least two votes. Votes or points are calculated by the amount of representatives the state has.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part of a democratic nation involves the equality of rights. However, in utilizing the electoral college, it is possible for the candidate to win presidency with a minimum of eleven states (Doc A). Yes, it is highly improbable for a candidate to garner all the support from the states with the highest electoral vote but the fact that the possibility exists is highly undemocratic since it would ignore more than half of the states. In continuance in its unfair representation, the electoral college does not equivalate the votes of every person. For example, twelve states has approximately three hundred thousand less people in population than Illinois, yet those states receive a total of forty-four electoral votes in comparison to Illinois’ twenty votes (Doc D).…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The electoral college was created by our forefathers for a purpose, and the reasons that support their decision still remain. The Americans who dispute the validity of the electoral college have a fundamental misunderstanding of purpose of both electoral college and the President of the United States.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Electoral College Benefits

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Those in favor of the college, lean on the certainty of the outcome, as its vote protects the interest of small states. In the election of 2004, for example, President Obama received a majority of the electoral vote, but only half of the popular vote. While all of the United States reward the winning candidate with all of the electoral votes, a mere plurality would create a landslide victory of the electoral vote. Author, Tara Ross writes, “…appears to retain the small advantage, while giving greater weight to the popular vote. In reality, it would devolve into constant disputes about who gets the last electoral vote in each state. The Electoral College, by contrast, tends to magnify margins of victory and give certain election outcomes,” (Ross pg. 159). Lastly, just as those that favor the Electoral College believe that the President should have the support of the people, those that oppose it feel like the people should then be able to pick the President. The idea is that the personal vote does not mean anything because citizens may vote one way while the Electoral College votes another, thereby making the popular vote obsolete. In the Academic Journal “Who Should Elect the President? The Case Against the Electoral College,” the author writes, “In the minds of some, there is a question of whether our form of government as a federal republic is safeguarded by having the Electoral College. According to this view, the fact that this country is a federation of states, and that the Constitution assigns certain powers to the federal government while others remain with the states, is of more importance than direct election of the President based on the principle of one person, one vote,” (Jenkins pg.176). Nevertheless, the rules are fair and the objective is…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Electoral College is an indirect voting mechanism. US citizens vote for representatives who then cast ballots for the US President. The electors do not have to cast their ballots as per the popular will in that state; they can defy the voters if necessary. This was done to protect against tyranny or a noble trying to usurp the democratic system. The convention however is that the electors vote in a block as per the citizen voters’ wishes.”…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College is a process of presidential nominations. A body of people representing the states of the United States, who casts votes for the election of the president and vice president. Also, can be seen as an election of the president by a vote in congress and election of the president by a popular vote of eligible citizens. “In the Article II of the U.S. Constitution Electoral College was seen as a compromise for the presidential election process because politicians believed that a purely popular election was too reckless and would give too much power to the heavily populated parts of the country” (Williams, 2012). The Electoral College is set up as American’s do not directly vote instead they choose a group of people who pledge to…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America has been seen as a land of Democracy. In democracy, things are meant to always be done by way of a majority vote. Many argue that the Electoral College prevents a true democracy. The process does not allow for voter’s votes to count; nothing more, nothing less. It allows for a higher power to decide based on population.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is called faithless electors. Now there are tons of arguments against the electoral college, but this one is by far the strongest. In most elections, the person who wins the electoral vote wins the popular vote. But it is actually possible to win the presidency with zero percent of the popular vote. Even though the 21.8% was mentioned earlier in this essay, that number is gotten is assuming all the electoral voters vote for who they are supposed to be voting for. According to Tyler Lewis, “While electors are generally extremely loyal to the party they align with, they don’t have to vote the way the people of their state instructed them to. In other words, just because a candidate won the popular vote in your state does not mean that your electors have to cast a vote for said candidate themselves.” What Tyler Lewis is stating there is that electors can vote for whoever they want! So one person can override the decision made by thousands, if not millions, of people! A person who does not vote for their states candidate is called a faithless elector. Sure, this rarely happens because some states have penalties if you do this and it has never happened enough to directly affect the results of the election, but the plain fact that this can even happen in the first place is a threat to America’s…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "The majority does not rule and every vote is not equal - those are reasons enough for scrapping the system. But there are other consequences as well. This election has been making clear how the Electoral College distorts presidential campaigns. A few swing states take on oversized importance, leading the candidates to focus their attention, money and promises on a small slice of the electorate." The 2000 election caused a lot of controversies. It took five weeks to determine the Presidency and the focus was placed too much on just one state. Many Presidential candidates spend their time and presidential money on the swing states which includes Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, Ohio, Virginia, New Hampshire, and Florida. We all have our own opinions…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays