That raised deep questions about the compatibility of the existence of a benevolent, all-powerful deity with the reality of evil and suffering in the world. Many philosophers and theologians contend with the problem by examining various forms of evil, including moral evil (such as human actions) and natural evil (such as disease and natural disasters), and exploring possible responses, such as theodicies and defenses. The problem of evil continues to be intensely argued in the philosophical inquiry and debate, offering insights into the nature of divinity, human existence, and moral responsibility. And these will be the five personalities that will be the content of this discussion based on their own understanding of the problem of evil and suffering: David Hume, Gottfried Liebniz, Fyodor Dostoevsky, John Hick, and Alvin Plantiga. First, let me discuss David Hume. He was an influential Scottish philosopher of the 18th century who addressed the problem of evil and suffering in his writings on philosophy and religion. According to the reporting of Mathew Naling, Hume's argument about evil challenged traditional conceptions of the existence of an all-powerful, all-good deity in the face of the occurrence of evil and suffering in the world. He explores questions about the compatibility of these attributes of God with the observed reality of pain, suffering, and moral evil. All throughout the reporting, it was exposed that Hume faced many critiques on the problem of evil that have had a lasting impact on philosophical discussions about the nature of God and the problem of evil, which stimulate ongoing debates about the existence and nature of a benevolent deity in the face of human suffering. Furthermore, David Hume's Argument from Evil addresses the
That raised deep questions about the compatibility of the existence of a benevolent, all-powerful deity with the reality of evil and suffering in the world. Many philosophers and theologians contend with the problem by examining various forms of evil, including moral evil (such as human actions) and natural evil (such as disease and natural disasters), and exploring possible responses, such as theodicies and defenses. The problem of evil continues to be intensely argued in the philosophical inquiry and debate, offering insights into the nature of divinity, human existence, and moral responsibility. And these will be the five personalities that will be the content of this discussion based on their own understanding of the problem of evil and suffering: David Hume, Gottfried Liebniz, Fyodor Dostoevsky, John Hick, and Alvin Plantiga. First, let me discuss David Hume. He was an influential Scottish philosopher of the 18th century who addressed the problem of evil and suffering in his writings on philosophy and religion. According to the reporting of Mathew Naling, Hume's argument about evil challenged traditional conceptions of the existence of an all-powerful, all-good deity in the face of the occurrence of evil and suffering in the world. He explores questions about the compatibility of these attributes of God with the observed reality of pain, suffering, and moral evil. All throughout the reporting, it was exposed that Hume faced many critiques on the problem of evil that have had a lasting impact on philosophical discussions about the nature of God and the problem of evil, which stimulate ongoing debates about the existence and nature of a benevolent deity in the face of human suffering. Furthermore, David Hume's Argument from Evil addresses the