There are different ways to prove if you are legally insane so you are not responsible for your crime. Being legally insane, according to dictionary, is when mental illness of such severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality as well as cannot conduct her/his affairs due to age or injury. Some examples of tests include the alignment test, the wild beast test, M 'Naghten rule, and the American Law Institute.
Back in the six century, Rome did not know how to deal with mentally ill or insane people. In their Code of Justinian it says, "madman" or a child could not be held responsible for a crime because such people were "not capable of wrongful intention".
The Alignment test also known as the Good-Evil test is a test on your character. There are three basic characteristics; good, neutral or evil. They can be divided into lawful, neutral/true, or chaotic. Everyone is either honorable, practical, or independent. Depending on your character you can be humane, realistic, or determined.
The wild beast test was mentioned in the eighteen century. Under this test, the defendant would have to be "totally deprived of his understanding and memory so as not knowing what he [was] doing, no more than an infant, a brute, or a wild beast". Most of the tests after this were more specific and made it harder for defendants to use the defense.
M 'Naghten rule as known as the right-wrong test is testing to see if the accused knows right from wrong when they claim temporary insanity. In the court house, it is a prebuttal presumption that you are sane and they have to prove that they were insane at the time of the crime. Following the M 'Naghten rule, in 1978, Supreme Court of California made another test the American Law Institute (ALI). It states that, "A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of law."
There aren 't that many organizations that help the mentally ill other than The National Alliance for Mental Ill (NAMI). This organization is funded mostly from pharmaceutical companies and started in 1979. It supports families and mental ill patients with psychoeducation, and research for better treatments. Most supporters are politicians and famous actors.
There are fifty-one types of insanity defenses in the United States, one for each set of state laws and one for federal law. On average less than one defendant in 100 actually use the insanity defense. Defendants found not guilty by reason of insanity is around 0.26 %. About 70 % of defendants found legally sane by a state-appointed expert withdraw from their plea of NGRI. The insanity defense is used in less than 1 % of all court cases. Of the cases that found the defendant NGRI, 90 % of the defendants had been already previously diagnosed with mental illness.
After the President Reagan assassination attempt, the insanity defense reform act of 1984 was passed. It made it harder for defendants to use the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. The reform reads, " It is an affirmations defense to a prosecution under any federal statute that, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the defendant and quality or the wrongfulness of his acts. Mental disease or defect does not otherwise constitute a defense." So now in order to use the insanity defense, you would have to have a severe mental disease and have a total lack or understanding or partial comprehension.
The Model Penal Code twenty-five reads, "In any criminal proceeding, including any juvenile court proceeding, in which a pleas of not guilty by reason of insanity is entered, the defense shall be found by the trier of fact only when the accused person proves by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she was incapable of knowing or understanding the nature and quality of his or her act and of distinguishing right from wrong at the time of the commission of the offense." Proposition eight, the "Victims ' Bill of Rights", which made Penal Code twenty-five, states "In any criminal proceeding, including any juvenile court proceeding, in which a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity is entered, this defense shall be found by the trier of fact only when the accused person proves by a preponderance of evidence that he or she was incapable of knowing or understanding the nature and quality of his or her act and of distinguishing right from wrong at the time of the commission of the offense." This states that the defendant must be not capable of understanding the nature of his or her act as well as not know from right and wrong.
The media has made the controversial issue of the inanity defense known in the cases of Hinckley, Dahmer, White, and Gacy. The case of John Hinckley Jr is one of the most famous cases. He became obsessed with actress Jodie Foster, who played in the movie Taxi Driver which also Robert Deniro plays Travis Bickle who plots to assassinate the presidential candidate in the movie. He began to stalk Jodie Foster and even thought about committing suicide in front of her. He decided to plot an assassination on President Ronald Reagan. After leaving a Hilton Hotel, Hinckley shot at the president six times but only one bullet hit his chest and he survived. Hinckley 's defense pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity and he was dismissed of all thirteen charges of assault, murder and weapon counts. The outcome of this cases was more strict laws on the defense.
Another publicized case was of Jeffrey Dahmer a serial killer and sex offender in 1991. Some of his offenses involved sex, cannibalism, necrophilia, and dismemberment. He committed his first murder in 1978, bludgeoning to death Steve Hicks, a hitchhiker because "the guy wanted to leave and didn 't want him to." In September 1987, he picked up Steven Tuomi at a gay bar and killed him out of impulse, claiming no memory of the event later in trial. In 1988, he was also arrested for giving drugs and sexual fonding a thirteen year old boy, Somsack Sinthasomphone. As a registered sex offender, he would then proceed to commit fifteen more murders, storing the corpses in vats. He plead not guilty by reason of insanity which was rejected. He served 15 murder charges and sentenced to fifteen consecutive life sentences. This case is important because if this physcopath is denied the defense then no other criminal would qualify for the defense.
The case of Dan White is also known as the famous Twinkie case. He was charged for the murders of San Francisco city supervisor Harvey Milk and mayor George Moscone. Mr. White defense team said he suffered diminished capacity because of his depression since he changed his healthy diet to Twinkies and junk food. He was convicted of voluntary manslaughter.
John Wayne Gacy took a job as "Pogo the Clown" and as secretary treasurer in the street lighting commission. People became suspicious when boys who worked with him started disappearing. Police obtained a search warrant for Mr. Gacy after he denied any knowledge on the missing boys. Authorities found thirty skeletons beneath his home of high school students and male prostitutes who he took to his home to rape as well as torture. Gacy admitted to the killings but pled insanity, which was rejected, so he was convicted and sentenced to death in 1994.
Should we allow the insanity to still continue? There are always two sides to an issue. We should keep the insanity defense because its fair for the mentally ill, defendants are not sentenced to death, and to use the defense you need the burden of proof.
Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is fair to those who have mental defects. Mental illness is a disease of the mind, that stops people of normal emotion and behavior skills. Most people think that mental disorders only affect people with life situations that are different than their own but in the United States very few families don 't have anyone that aren 't diagnosed with mental defects. There are many different mental illnesses like depression, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, and obsessive compulsive disorder.
Another positive thing about keeping the defense is that defendants are not sentenced to death if they are found not guilty by reason of insanity. Most of the time defendants who use the defense spend twice as long in a psychiatric hospital than jail time for their acts. Few insanity defendants are given supervised release, and very less are released right after their verdict.
In order to use the defense you need to prove insanity by the burden of proof. The burden of proof means "without reasonable doubt" that what you claim is true and right. They have to provide clear and convincing evidence. Mentally defected defendants deserve treatment not a jail sentence for the safety of the public.
The insanity defense is an excuse for defendants, a crime is a crime no matter what and it does not guarantee freedom. The defense is an excuse for defendants to be not guilty of crimes they commit. Victims of abuse often say they are temporarily insane for defending their violent behavior during the time of their crimes. For example, the case of Lorena Bobbitt was charged with cutting off her husband 's penis, she was released of her assault charges because of her husband 's emotional and physical abuse.
How can a person who is insane know how to pick up a gun and use it to shoot a person? A crime is a crime no matter your state of mind at the time. Most defendants plead not guilty by reason of insanity even after admitting to their crimes. Defendants easily abuse the defense and trick psychiatric evaluators when they are in a mental institute so they can be let out early. A Michigan ex-convict plead insanity after seven killings and returned to the streets in two months. In a month, he was charged with murdering his wife.
Using the NGRI defense will put on on your records and it does not guarantee freedom. Some jurisdictions do not accept the insanity plea and those that do need a burden of prove. It 's hard to prove insanity without having previous medical records of an illness that would affect their way of thinking at the time of their acts. People convicted of insanity could spend the rest of their life 's inside a mental institute.
I was interested in writing about the insanity defense because I wanted to learn more about it and how it works in a trial. I thought the insanity defense was just a complete waste and it 's a criminal 's easiest excuse to freedom. I have always been interested in criminals ' minds and reading about murder cases. I decided this was a great controversial issue to write on because students need to do their research and get educated when it comes to laws to improve our society as well as our courts.
I decided that keeping the insanity defense was the best answer to this controversial issue. I think this because I believe that everyone should be treated equal no matter what condition of mental health they are. After doing research, the most surprising thing I found out was that the insanity defense is hardly used and its not as easy to be found not guilty by reason of insanity like I first initially thought. Throughout the history of the insanity defense, the government has been improving the defense so banning it all together won 't give justice to all Americans. I personally think most people have the misconception that the insanity defense should be banned because the media publicizes a one-sided story out on the newspapers that people are committing crimes mad getting away with it.
I think society feels that the insanity defense is just a loophole in the system when it comes to crimes. They don 't take in consideration of people who do have real diagnosed mental defects. The insanity defense is not allowed in Kansas, Montana, Idaho and Utah. In other states in America the tests on insanity varies but most of the time include proof of burden.
In the future, I hope students as well as voters will learn more about how serious mental illness are before they make an assumption. In the United States, you are innocent until proven guilty and it should stay that way. Not all brain diseases are categorized as mental disorders and scientists are learning that mental illness is associated with changes in the brain structure, chemistry, function as well as that mental disorders are not biological.
I feel that soon people will ban the insanity defense all together. I think this will probably happen after a high publicized case that let the defendant be not guilty by reason of insanity. Hopefully if voters really took the time to know the laws and the background of the insanity defense they will understand why it is important to keep the insanity defense. Keeping the insanity defense is not a problem because there are already a few number of cases even using the defense. In most cases that the defendant admits to their crimes, they try to accept a plea bargain before they try for the NGRI plea.
Outline for the Insanity Defense
I. The Background of the Insanity Defense A. Definitions 1. Insanity Defense 2. Legally Insane B. Kinds of Tests 1. Code of Justinian 2. The Alignment Test 3. Wild Beast Test 4. M 'Naghten Rule 5. American Law Institute C. Organizations 1. The National Alliance for Mental Ill D. Statistics E. Laws 1. Insanity Defense Reform Act 2. Model Penal Code F. People 1. John Hinckley Jr. 2. Jeffrey Dahmer 3. Dan White 4. John Gacy
II. Pros of the Insanity Defense 1. Fair for the Mentally Ill 2. Not sentenced to death 3. Burden of proof
III. Cons of the Insanity Defense 1. Excuse for defendants 2. Crime is a crime 3. No guarantee of freedom
IV. My Decision 1. Why the Insanity Defense? 2. Keep the defense
V. What 's to come in the Future 1. Society 's view 2. Educated society about mental illnesses 3. No more insanity pleas
Bibliography
Bender, David. Mental Health. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1999.
Collins, Kimberly. The John Hinckley Trial and Its Effects on the Insanity Defense. [online]
Available http:// law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrails/hinckleyinsanity.htm. 11 April 2013.
Fact on File News Services. "Inanity Defense." Issues & Controversies. [online] Available http:// www.2facts.com/article/:0401890. 17 February 2009.
Rowe, Jonathan. "Why Liberals should hate the Insanity Defense." The Washington Monthly, May 1984.
Silver, Stuart B. and Cohen, Marcia I. and Spodack, Michael K. "Follow-up after Release of Inanity Acquittees, Mentally Disordered Offenders and Convicted Felons." 20 April 2013.
Young, Gideon. Top 10 Notorious Insanity Defense Cases. [online] Available http://listverse.com/2012/04/11/top-10-most-notorious-insanity-defense-cases/. 11 April 2012.
Endnotes
The John Hinckley Trial & Its Effects on the Insanity Defense, available [online] http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/hinckley/hinckleyinsanity.htm 22 April 2013.
National Alliance on Mental Illness, available [online] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Alliance_on_Mental_Illness 20 April 2013.
Inanity Defense, available [online] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense 30 April 2013.
The 'Insanity defense ' and diminished capacity, available [online] http://www.law.cornell.edu/background/insane/insanity.html 22 April 2013.
Top 10 Most Notorious Insanity Defense Cases, available [online] http://listverse.com/2012/04/11/top-10-most-notorious-insanity-defense-cases/ 11 April 2012.
Bibliography: Bender, David. Mental Health. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1999.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Bruce Dawe is a famous poet born in 1930. He incorporated similar techniques in his poems ‘War Without End’ and ‘Description of an Idea’. In the ‘War Without End’ the war is metaphorical and represented as the never ending car crashes and accidents on our roads every year whereas in ‘Description of an Idea’ the war is represented as a historical past event that was associated with the 1989 massacre in Tiananmen Square. Each poem illustrates the similarities between a metaphorical and literal war via the use of repetition, historical references and ambiguity.…
- 892 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…
- 1368 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Insanity defense first came into England’s radar when Daniel McNaughton, who attempted to murder, Prime Minister Robert Peel. McNaughton Rule became a common law test to determine criminal liability in relation to mentally disturbed defendants. Another notable case is that of Reagan, John Hinckley who in 1981 attempted to assassinate the president.…
- 295 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When we apply the labels ‘mental illness’ and ‘schizophrenic mental disorder to a person, it does not necessarily mean, from a legal standpoint that this person does not know right from wrong. What this term would include would be things like mental deficiencies, like when a person would suffer form hallucinations or other mental diseases and retardation. “In M'Naghten's modern form, a defendant who pleads insanity must prove that at the time of the offense he or she was suffering from a mental disease or disability, such as retardation, so severely as not to know either "the nature and quality of the act" or whether it was right or wrong” (Gibeaut, 2006). So if this person who committed this crime did not understand the crimes consequences, and did not know the difference between right and wrong, this would fall under M'Naghten's rule. In order for someone to use that insanity defense, these aspects had to be present. From the original rule to now, it has been shortened legally to not knowing right from wrong. As far as alcohol cases go; this person knows right form wrong, but because they are intoxicated from alcohol, they acted in a ‘diminished capacity”; they however were not acting out of mental disease.…
- 365 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Guilty but insane means that the individual knew at the time that their actions were wrong but because of their mental disorder or disease they had no control over their actions.…
- 525 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The insanity defense is only raised in 1% of cases and then only successful 25% of the time it is used; although its rarity, the legal court has very detailed rules. Most rules describe not guilty by reason of insanity as not being aware of what you were doing in that exact moment. Adam Banner suggests that the Eddie Routh case had an accurate ruling of guilty because of his claim that, “...the disposition is ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’. It is not ‘not guilty by reason of mental illness’,”. Only Mental Health America would disagree, stating, “The Court has indicated that states may be required to provide at least some minimal defense based on mental illness,”. Coincidently, these changes have not been made thus…
- 803 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Sanity is being mostly or completely in control of your actions and having the capacity to think through the consequences. Moreover, knowing right from wrong and reflecting upon situations and processing them adequately; knowing the proper way to react. Based on this definition, “insanity” would mean the opposite. Insanity is when someone is not fully in control of their actions and potentially doesn’t have the capacity to think through their issues in a logical manner. Being mentally detached from society and acting solely on emotions, especially extreme…
- 1068 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Frontline, it is used in “less than 1 percent of felony cases, and is successful in only a fraction of those” (Insanity defense faqs). Less than one percent, that’s how many times the insanity defense is used. According to the National Institute of Corrections, “In a 2006 Special Report, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) estimated that 705,600 mentally ill adults were incarcerated in State prisons, 78,800 in Federal prisons and 479,900 in local jails” (Mentally ill persons). Look at those numbers. The number of mentally ill adults incarcerated in state, federal and local prisons or jails is a staggering one million two hundred sixty four thousand three hundred mentally ill, that is 1,264,300 incarcerated in the United States. Why then, is the percentage less than1% when it comes to those who use the insanity defense during court? The Sentencing Project says that there are “2.2 million people currently in the nation's prisons or jails” (Incarceration). According to the numbers, the mentally ill make up more than 1% of those incarcerated. In fact, the mentally ill in the prison system is at 57% of those in the entire prison system. How is it that 57% of inmates in prison are mentally ill, but only 1% use the insanity defense? What is wrong with the insanity defense then? For starters, it is difficult to prove and the burden of proof lies on the…
- 1349 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
be able to use that defense, one has to have a separate trial to determine if he or she is insane.…
- 705 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…
- 553 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Harris, M. (2013, January 14). Insanity plea repeated. In The Baltimore Sun . Retrieved March…
- 1668 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
When I try to reason how people would interpret the insanity defense, it reminds me of the common misconceptions that juror's have of the defense itself. In the textbook it examines the various insanity defenses and the courts perception of the defenses, while in the video, Lionel tries to examine peoples reactions to the insanity defense. In the textbook while it went to how the defense's many interpretations have effected case outcomes, Lionel's video tries to clarify that how average Americans cant handle the horrors they see when looking at the crime scene photo's and then trying to decide that the defendant could be considered for a insanity defense.…
- 109 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Many people wrongly believe that there are only two ways to plead in trial, guilty and not guilty. There is also another way to plead, that most people use to try and escape any criminal responsibility, pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. Not guilty by reason of insanity refers to the defense of offenders not to deny the commission of the crime, but to assert they lacked the capacity to understand the nature of the crime or that it was wrong (Allen). The definition of pleading legally insane can differ from each state, country or jurisdiction. This is usually abused and pleaded wrongly. Therefore it is very difficult to be found not guilty this way. A study carried out in the USA found that the insanity defense is only used in about 1% of all court cases and is only successful in about 26% of those cases (New York Times). The jury must discover if the plea were true or not based on extreme psychiatric testimonies and usually lengthy trials. A prime example of this is in the murder of Elena Steinberg, also known as the sleepwalk murder. In this murder Steven Steinberg was found not guilty on reasons of temporary insanity.…
- 1115 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Most of the cases that media covers in which the insanity defense is involved are homicide cases. However, around 60 to 70 percent of cases in which the defendant pleads NGRI are crimes other than murder. Since the media only covers the extreme cases, many people don’t consider the plea being used for less serious charges. Some of these lesser charges can range from shoplifting to assault (Gale Encyclopedia of American Law, 2010, p. 438). For example, the media covered the case of John Hinckley Jr., a man who attempted to assassinate President Ronald Reagan. Hinckley claimed that he was only trying to impress an actress, Jodie Foster, who he was obsessed with. Hinckley successfully plead NGRI and spent the next 36 years in a mental hospital until his release in September of 2016. In the mental hospital Hinckley was treated for various mental illnesses with which he had been diagnosed. The general public sees cases such as Hinckley’s as a failure on part of the legal system to punish criminals and therefore call for the abolition of the insanity defense, without knowing the full process employed in these trials. In the article “Does the Insanity Defense have a Legitimate Role?” (2006) it is stated: “The media may foster the notion that criminals get away with feigning mental defect, only to be released and recidivate” (p. 31). As stated earlier in this paper,…
- 1410 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…
- 842 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays