His work is reflective of that of the Early Renaissance and even just the layout of his scene is very different from da Vinci’s. In Castagno’s painting, the table is very even distributed, there is enough room for Christ and his apostles to be seated comfortably. Judas, the one who would betray Christ, is seated on the opposite side of the table as the others, thus symbolizing his indifference and the future crime against Christ he would commit. Lastly, the scene is very decorated in a way that may distract from the spiritual event taking place. Da Vinci, on the other hand, has simplified the décor and architecture in a way that eradicates any unnecessary details that would distract from the spirituality. He places all the apostles and Christ on the same side of the table, using the table as a barrier to separate the viewer on Earth from the spiritual domain where the scene is taking place. His emphasis on spirituality gains the painting a more naturalistic result than the other painting by
His work is reflective of that of the Early Renaissance and even just the layout of his scene is very different from da Vinci’s. In Castagno’s painting, the table is very even distributed, there is enough room for Christ and his apostles to be seated comfortably. Judas, the one who would betray Christ, is seated on the opposite side of the table as the others, thus symbolizing his indifference and the future crime against Christ he would commit. Lastly, the scene is very decorated in a way that may distract from the spiritual event taking place. Da Vinci, on the other hand, has simplified the décor and architecture in a way that eradicates any unnecessary details that would distract from the spirituality. He places all the apostles and Christ on the same side of the table, using the table as a barrier to separate the viewer on Earth from the spiritual domain where the scene is taking place. His emphasis on spirituality gains the painting a more naturalistic result than the other painting by