Preview

The Liberal International Order Is Alive And Well Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1431 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Liberal International Order Is Alive And Well Analysis
In 2011, Princeton professor G. John Ikenberry wrote that, despite what many critics had started to claim after the 2008 global financial crisis, “the liberal international order is alive and well.” The emergence of non-Western actors on the world scene was not a challenge to the current system but was, in fact, proof that the system worked. The rise of China, India, and Brazil via organizations like the World Trade Organization would incentivize these emerging powers as well as other still emerging states to continue to work within the system, even possibly seek leadership and authority positions within it as America’s influenced slowly declined. Continued progress on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) gives hope that developed and developing …show more content…
There are a number of examples that show the liberal world order will continue to survive. One need only look at how much better the non-Western countries fared during the global economic crisis. Countries like India and China, though China could not be said to be a champion of liberal ideals, came out unshaken and continued to grow economically, because they operate within the liberal internationalist system. In terms of democracy, it may be considered to have broken down in countries such as Russia and Turkey, but it has made gains elsewhere. In 2015, Sri Lanka returned to an electoral democracy, Nigeria saw its first peaceful democratic transfer of power, and Tunisia became the first Arab democracy in decades. As for multilateral institutions, despite the loss of the United Kingdom, the EU is a resilient group recently energized by the election of Emmanuel Macron, France’s new President. Elsewhere, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is still committed to multilateral engagement and cooperation on resolving geopolitical issues …show more content…
If Ikenberry and company are correct, China will still participate in the system as long as it continues to see it as a viable source of economic development. This will be especially important if the Chinese leadership wants to avoid a crisis of faith in its ability to continue improving the lives of its citizens. The liberal order still has its champions in Germany’s Angela Merkel, France’s Emmanuel Macron, and Japan’s Shinzo Abe; they must keep the faith in the system, continue to promote its values, and support the progress of new democracies around the world. Yes, the liberal order is in crisis, but crisis is the best time for democratic leaders to make positive changes in the system and, hopefully, continue its spread across the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Reli 312 Essay Exam

    • 1643 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The idea of Globalization as a way to forward international connectivity is not Western but often times Globalization is used to advance western ideas. Although Globalization is not inherently western, currently globalization is acting as a vehicle to advance westernization. To understand how Globalization is used to advance Westernization it is important to note the definition of neoliberalism, a Western ideology that is being spread and encouraged by the United States. Neoliberals “argue that deregulation and privatization of state-owned enterprises and limited government involvement in the economy [are] the best ways for countries’ economies to grow and individual freedoms to flourish.”(Campbell, 12) Neoliberalism…

    • 1643 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Once upon a time, in the decades following WWII, the United States had its hand in nearly every international action that had occurred. The United States was also majorly responsible for the establishment for many of the reigning supranational organizations today including the UN, the World Bank, the IMF, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Although many of these US born ideals played in the interest of the US, these organizations benefited the world for the better. It is important to assume that the world operates under a realism approach and that other nations desire to take the place of the United States as a global Hegemony. Stephen Walt states “The only way to have the world’s most capable military forces both now and into the future is to have the world’s most advanced economy, and that means having better schools, the best universities, a scientific establishment that is second to none, and a national infrastructure that enhances productivity and dazzles those who visit from abroad.” What realistic steps can the United States take in order to better our schools and universities, scientific establishment, and national infrastructure ending in a raised economy? (Walt, 2011/16). Even though the US is set in its ways, all hope is not lost. If strict changes are made to the education system, scientific establishment, and national infrastructure, the US will again see itself rising to the top uncontested. Allowing the United States to again maintain its ability to have a positive influence in nearly every “corner” of the globe not only benefits Americans, it plays in the interest of the entire world.…

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens P. (eds) (2008), Shapcott, R.in 'The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 3976 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zakaria suggests America reevaluates its role in the international system to be able to produce foreign policies that will enable US to adapt to the new era. The task for today is to construct a new approach for a new era, one that responds to a global system in which power is far more diffuse than ever before and in which everyone feels empowered (Zakaria 231). Zakaria suggests that there is a need for change in America’s foreign policy, but the foundation is sound. America should not be concerned about being overthrown since many developing powers are joining, and not fighting America. Developing nations like China and India, “want to gain power and status and respect, for sure, but by growing within the international system, not by overturning it” (Zakaria 232). Thus, America should not response to the emerging countries with force or in a negative manner. Encouraging diplomatic relations and opening new economic trade relations with all of the emerging powers will foster a prosperous global environment and consolidate the American ideals in global…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pax Americana

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The changes linked to the globalising international economy have had considerable impact on the functions and disposition national states. This changes however, did not begin with globalisation but after World War II when during the golden age of capitalism when an economic hegemony – the US – was created and the world experienced political and economic progression up to the 60s (Dorrien 2013). This however, changed during the 70s when the western world consisting the US and western Europe experienced stagflation – that is economic inflation and high unemployment incidents that generated recession (Clarke 1987). This turmoil later led towards neo-liberalism witnessed in the 80s. Some authors argue that neo-liberalism is the primary driver of…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Globalisation as described by John Bayliss is the widening, deepening and speeding up of global interconnectness. Distinctions are usualy made between economic, cultural and political forms of globalization.Over recent years Liberals have tended to agree with the statement whereas the Realists disagree with the statement.…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stage Setter Assessment

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Barnett’s article titled, “It Explains Why We’re Going to War, and Why We’ll Keep Going to War” presents the author’s theories on the relationship between globalization and the risk of U.S. and allied nation involvement with war and conflict. In this context, globalization can easily be defined as technology, a higher level of education, and financial prosperity. The author goes further to define specific areas of world: the Core, the Gap and seam states. The Core consists of many functioning and prosperous countries and continents, for example, North America, parts of South America,…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Outline

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    America: A country that prides itself on being the “Arsenal of Democracy” and the “Policeman of the World.” While this title is duly bred in the hearts and mind of our citizenry, there are some who believe that this title doesn’t accurately describe the underlying notions of our nation’s second agenda. John Perkins, a consultant and self-described “Economic Hit Man,” has had firsthand experience with the uglier side of American international business and international cooperation. In his book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, Perkins describes the exact method in which American business, hand in hand with International Banks and the US Government itself, has impacted and even devastated local economies worldwide. Through his career travels throughout countries such as Indonesia, Colombia, Saudi Arabia, among others, Perkins gives us a vivid description of how the American “Corporatocracy” has directly impacted developing nations’ local economies, namely by dictating unfair economic rules, leading unsuspecting governments to take out expensive loans on essential infrastructure and natural resource projects, and forcing military and political cooperation, among other things. This outright trickery and deception, on the side of America, has left a sour taste for our nation in many of the developing parts of the world, nations where future alliances are critical, and where our future wellbeing resides. Therefore it is essential to curb any ethnocentric tendencies we may have in order to help us along to get recognized. In this paper, I will go over the exact details that Perkins has discussed in his book, providing my own opinion, as well as what I have learned in class and from my readings. In order for us a nation to be well received around the world, we must monitor ourselves from a non-ethnocentric standpoint, and look at the actions and impact which we have had around the world, and how…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we all know, the United States has grown into a global superpower. Wherever we look, there is something that has been inspired by the American ideology. America’s globalization has drastically changed many countries for the better because it changes the economy, community, and foreign policy.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Let us jump back to that time. President Franklin D. Roosevelt envisioned a deeply institutionalized, Western-led world order in which the US had political and economic management. However, the US couldn't lead the world alone, so were created the World Bank, the IMF, the UN, global institutions which are well-established in today's political world. Since 1945, the US have been a provider of International Public Goods, military and economic security, leadership and diplomatic energy. Hence, it is difficult to see a world order that is not US-led. Acharya makes a compelling argument about emerging countries having an influence in remodelling of the liberal aspect of "liberal world order" but he admits "the emerging powers are not an adequate force by themselves to create a credible alternative". Individually, BRICS countries do not propose a credible alternative to global governance. They also lack all three forms of power (hard, soft, and smart) relative to the US. Furthermore, as a group, BRICS countries are quite different from each other and lack cohesion to collectively overthrow the AWO. Some of them have nuclear weapons, they range in political systems from democratic to authoritarian to communist, and they have competing relationships among themselves. Contrast this with the AWO created after World War II, where the old powers were defeated and/or bankrupt while the US…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 21st century is still young, but it has already presented the United States with a series of internal and external challenges. Since the demise of USSR in 1991, the world changed from bipolar with two great powers to unipolar with the United States as an unchallenged superpower. From that point, the United States has long been accepted as a hegemon, the only predominant actor which has great political, social and economic influence in global affairs. However, recently, the world has witnessed the promptly rise of other new centers with significant powers such as China, Japan, and the European Union etc., which has actually challenged the hegemonic position of the United States in international system. In the 2011 summer issue of the journal of the American Academy of Political Science, we read that it is "a common theme" that the United States, which "only a few years ago was hailed to stride the world as a colossus with unparalleled power and unmatched appeal -- is in decline, ominously facing the prospect of its final decay." So, one question has been raised is whether the United States can retain its leading role or is a hegemon in decline. Much attention has been paid to this problem, some may argue that the country is still and always the most powerful and influential leader in the world. Or if there is any signal of going down, it’s unchangeable. This paper, however, is to provide an opposite idea that the United States is a hegemon in decline due to some major problems which are going to be discussed in the following parts.…

    • 2662 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Economic Downfall

    • 2244 Words
    • 9 Pages

    America, by many accounts, is already experiencing decline yet shall not be replaced by another power at any point soon. The resilience of the liberal order, the material and structural advantage accumulated by America has ensured that decline will be gradual. ‘Decline’ has manifested itself in cautious and pragmatic US foreign policy both economically and militarily, but there is little to suggest that there will be significant change to the status quo. Contenders to US hegemony, such as China, India and the EU, lack the material resources or political will to make American decline of paradigmatic magnitude. While in gradual decline, America will retain the mantle of global leadership for the remainder of this decade and beyond. Such decline may seem undesirable, but it has potential for good as the liberal economic order underwritten by the US has proven its instability since the turn of the millennium, leading to an uneasy balance in which American perpetually borrows to lend.[1] This system is unsustainable and needing reform. American decline is desirable as it could open discussion on replacing or reforming this economic order. The true extent of American decline will be explored below, examining the cases put forward regarding the America’s economic and military decline, and the ‘rise’ of other powers. It will become clear that while a marked decline in projection of power can be observed, no other state poses a credible challenge to America’s position as hegemon. While America remains the dominant power in the international system the case will be made below that there are grounds to be cautiously optimistic about a decline in American power.…

    • 2244 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The growth and progress has been so alarming for the West that many in the West are worried as to what extent BRICS can really shift the order of global politics. The current progress of BRICS narrates that its growth is southward. Mexico and Indonesia are being considered to be in the club. Future expansion proposals suggest entry of Egypt; this will have greater continental representation. There is optimism that BRICS share a vision for inclusive growth and prosperity in global politics through the South-South dialogue. The Durban summit collectively agreed to push BRICS to become “a full-fledged mechanism of current and long-term coordination on a wide range of key issues of the world economy and politics”. BRICS is currently acting more as a ‘pressure group’ in order to maximise the claim and share of the developing world. Nevertheless, the very existence and rapid rise of BRICS remains a constant reminder of the declining supremacy of the USA, indicating that an order in power shift is underway currently at the broader global level. In the view of Jeffrey Sachs, the rise of BRICS is an integral part of this shift in that ‘the BRICS have made it unfeasible for any one country to be a global leader’. The shift is from a ‘unipolar world’ led by the USA to a ‘multipolar world’ where there are a range of power blocs like the USA, EU, BRICS and other smaller powers that matter in global…

    • 3717 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first, there is a growing uncertainty about the future of the global economic order after the financial crisis of US in 2008 and Europe in 2010. The reasons from these two crisis may vary, but these brought into question the legitimacy and sustainability of the global economic order dominated by the western leading countries after the Second World War. The skepticism about western's political and economic leadership is based on the prospect that the economic hegemony may move rapidly from the United States and Europe to China and emerging Asia market after those two global crisis. Also, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), terrorism, climate change, and economic imbalances between the rich country and the poor country are all issues that great powers alone cannot resolve.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The events following World War II had a great impact on the Westernization of the world. America solidified its status as the primary hegemonic figure and following that globalization flourished. This occurrence along with Ronald Reagan’s policies sparked a tremendous change in the way countries do business and how America was transformed into a global leader. Reaganomics changed America throughout the better part of the eighties and opened up neoliberal practices that continue to dominate international order today. These practices haven’t necessarily positive for the world in an overall standpoint but it is how events have transpired. Any time the wealthiest countries and companies become wealthier while the weak become weaker something is clearly flawed. That is how these neoliberal practices conducted by Reagan have evolved. Globalization in this regard hasn’t been beneficial to the world as a whole but in the future weaker countries will begin to prosper more. A recent event that supports this was the agreement of the Group of Eight (G8) at its…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays