Louis’s actions himself, his indecisiveness and lack of political wit was an pivotal and arguably the most important reason for the end of the constitutional monarchy. The flight to varennes in 1791 is mentioned in both sources A and D, and is seen as an event which sealed the opinions in people’s mind of the king as a counter-revoltionary. Source A says “it appeared that the King intented to escape to Metz, where the chiefs of the counter-revoltioaryemigres are” and source D also says “cowardly flights opened the citizens’s eyes”. The language of the sources itself depicts how this failed flight to varennes where Louis was spotted by a postmaster at night is represnetiave of how this flight brought the king down. Souece A uses the word “escape”, which is indicative of how Louis felt he was threatened and unsafe at the centre of the revolutionary fever in Pairs, thus this escapeism proved his counter revolutionary sentiment. This indeed “opened the citizesn’ eyes”, and seaked his fate, as now the people of France had clear evidence of Louis’s lack of support for the revolution. Thus…
In June 1791, King Louis XVI and his family snuck out of Paris during the night, hoping to escape from the French Revolution and its violence. He planned to escape the country and return with foreign assistance to reclaim control of France, but the people of Varennes stopped and detained him until authorities arrived and sent him back to Paris. Louis’ attempted escape, in addition to the letter he left behind denouncing the Revolution, “profoundly influenced the political and social climate of France” (223). His escape outraged many people and left the administration in shambles, and this caused tensions to break out. To control the situation, the people of France quickly organized their own authoritative forces. Timothy Tackett argues in When the King Took Flight that Louis XVI’s escape is significant because it destroyed faith in the monarch and amplified the violence of the Revolution but at the same time instilled a new sense of unity among the French.…
In the last minutes of the movie, King Arthur has gathered a legion of knights to aid him in storming the castle and retrieving the Holy Grail. Just as he orders his men to charge, the police show up. Yes, 20th century police show up in the middle of the charge. The police then arrest King Arthur for murdering the Historian, thus ending the movie.…
On that day, the National Constituent Assembly issued a decree that the king, Louis XVI, would remain king under a constitutional monarchy. Later that day, leaders of the republicans in Francerallied against this decision. The larger crowd was also more determined than the first. Lafayette again tried to disperse it.…
“The execution of Louis XVI marked the beginning of the 18 month period of the French Revolution that has come to be called ‘The Reign of Terror’”(49). It was led by no other than Robespierre, in an attempt to start a new government, which proceeded to execute large numbers of people. The 18 months was a blood pouring event during the French Revolution. These events were unnecessary and the whole Reign of Terror was unjustified because it was a sin to kill, they went against what other through and what was right, and they went beyond what was necessary.…
During the mid 16th century and 17th centuries, two tremendous rulers emerged in France. During the age of rule under both Henry IV and Louis XIV, France obtained an absolutist government, which the majority of citizens supported. Henry IV was more so a compromiser compared to Louis XIV who was at war the majority of his reign. King Henry IV clashes with the characteristics of King Louis XIV as a result. King Henry IV’s reign differed from that of King Louis XIV’s in militaristic, economic, and religious aspects.…
Stating the fact the if his father had not died, Louis Auguste wouldn't have become the next throne. At least until later on. Louis Auguste was ill prepared for the throne, considering he was very young. When he inherited the throne as Louis XVI, France was in a massive debt. He was immature, lacked self-confidence and also lacked sufficient strength of character and decisiveness. Due to those terms, he was a weak king. If his father was still the king, France wouldn't be as burdened with debts and under heavy taxation as to how it was during Louis Auguste being the king. Louis XIV had a brilliant minister of finance, named Jean-Baptiste Colbert, who drastically reduced the debt of France and helped make it the wealthiest country in Europe.…
Louis the 14th, who is named as France’s Sun King, had the longest reign in European history beginning from 1643 until he dies in 1715. He had only five years old when he became the king of France, therefore the reign was almost dominated by the Cardinal until he died in 1661 . Following the cardinal’s death, Louis brought the absolute monarchy at the risk of taking both his mother’s and the council’s reactions .…
Louis XIV's reign had been notably distinguished by extravagance where, Louis XV's reign was characterized by the act of carelessness. After doing some background research and reading on this character, I found that Louis XV was a perfect example of the Old Regime's dysfunction. He preferred to satisfy his mistresses rather than satisfying his kingdom. Louis XV’s actions displayed through his work. He forced France into serious financial…
Louis XIV (1643-1715), known as the Sun King, was a monarch of The House of Bourbon who ruled as the King of France. Louis was declared king in 1643, at age five, after the death of his father, Louis XIII (1601-1643). Since Louis was not at the age to rule, Cardinal Mazarin (1602-1661), Louis’s tutor, and Anne of Austria (1601-1666), Louis’s mother, ruled France until 1654 when Louis was officially crowned King of France. Louis, an adherent of the idea of divine right of kings, functioned his absolutism primarily in the authoritative areas of Europe state action like making war and peace, regulating religion, and overseeing economic activity.…
Due to his age, Louis XIII’s aunt, Marie de Medici, becomes his regent, and Cardinal Richelieu becomes France’s chief advisor. With Richelieu as chief advisor, he continues the policy of Absolutism where the king has absolute power. He dominates the royal council by making hundreds of noblemen all live in one palace under the king’s rule. In addition, Richelieu destroys people’s castles and fortresses in order for the existence of only one army in france controlled by king. Lastly, Richelieu kills anyone who threatens King Louis XIII, or is suspected to be planning a rebellion against the king. Eventually, French Absolutism turns into a society in which the king controls the kingdom, and people are unable to take any initiative over their own…
King Louis XIV of France inherited the throne at five years of age with Mazarin as his chief minister. Just as he had taken the throne the Fronde had occurred and had driven the young boy out of his palace. Shortly after Mazarin had died, King Louis XIV, at twenty-three years, regained his control and named himself the Sun King of absolute power. King Louis had expanded the bureaucracy and created new lands for farming and mining. But the Sun King’s greatest accomplishment was building the Palace of Versailles. The immense palace was spared no expense and became the perfect symbol to represent the king’s power and wealth. Ruling for seventy-two years, King Louis XIV has left a long lasting impact on France.…
King Louis XIV began his reign of France the day after Cardinal Mazarin’s death and expressed his determination to be a real king and the sole ruler of France. He reigned in France from 1643 to 1715 and held the desire to enhance the glory of his dynasty. Louis XIV consciously fostered the myth of himself as the Sun King, the source of light for all of his people. He was a staunch believer in the theory of divine-right monarchy, which was a based on the belief that monarchs receive their power from God and are therefore responsible to no one except God. Louis’ goal was “one king, one law, one faith,” which he accomplished by controlling the nobility, adhering to mercantilism, and using religion as a tool for national unity.…
The nationalist perspective of King Louis XIV is that the head of the country is the nation and for society to prosper the people have to be willing to serve and follow the leader’s will. The source’s perspective can be shown throughout history by the beliefs and values he had during his reign in France. The source believed in the uses of a social hierarchy and the absolute monarch. The social hierarchy benefited the people who were part of the Roman Catholic Clergy or nobility. These people received privileges and were not required to pay taxes. The rest of the population had a difficult and challenging way of living. They were required to serve the king by paying taxes which lead to poor living conditions, in which some died from starvation. The absolute monarch allowed all the power in France to be consolidated in the hands of the king. This allowed for King Louis XIV to be the main voice in France and gave the power to decide how the country will operate. These ideals were the main contributions to start of the French Revolution, many people felt that they deserved better rights which lead the nation members to revolt and seek a better constitution. The source would disagree with J.D Vance’s idea to bridge the gap between the rich and poor. King Louis XIV would believe that he should not have to…
Many people made statements that were pro-Louis by saying "He surrounded himself with numerous men who were extremely intelligent and capable," this may be true but many think that these capable men were homosexuals who satisfied the Sun King's needs. Louis XIV was never openly gay, but it was said about him, partly because of his brother, Phillippe. Philippe was openly gay, and thus the object of scorn, which also affected Louis XIV. Louis also did not have as many mistresses as the rulers of other countries such as England and Spain, and more male servants than those countries too. Also the fact that he is the French ruler does not make his national background convincing to be heterosexual.…