Preview

Use Your Own Knowledge to Assess How Far the Sources Support the Interpretation That the End of the Constitutional Monarchy Was Largely the Fault of Louis Xvi Himself?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1373 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Use Your Own Knowledge to Assess How Far the Sources Support the Interpretation That the End of the Constitutional Monarchy Was Largely the Fault of Louis Xvi Himself?
The end of the constitutional monarchy and savage attack on the tuliers on 10th August 1792 was the result of various events. The 5 sources mention various possible reasons for this, however there is common thread to them all in that the King was largely responsible for his own demise. Source E and D strongly agree with this viewpoint, whereas Sources C,B and A take a rather milder and less explicit view. The war in Europe and tension with Austria and Prussia is also seen as a reason for the fall of the end of the constitituonal monarchy and is mentioned by Sources D and E. There is also the factor that the king was helpless as these infectious radical ideas were spreading no matter what, and sources A,B and C mention this. Moreover the role of the nobles,emigres and refractory priests in bringing down the King is mentioned through manyof the sources including sources C, D and E.

Louis’s actions himself, his indecisiveness and lack of political wit was an pivotal and arguably the most important reason for the end of the constitutional monarchy. The flight to varennes in 1791 is mentioned in both sources A and D, and is seen as an event which sealed the opinions in people’s mind of the king as a counter-revoltionary. Source A says “it appeared that the King intented to escape to Metz, where the chiefs of the counter-revoltioaryemigres are” and source D also says “cowardly flights opened the citizens’s eyes”. The language of the sources itself depicts how this failed flight to varennes where Louis was spotted by a postmaster at night is represnetiave of how this flight brought the king down. Souece A uses the word “escape”, which is indicative of how Louis felt he was threatened and unsafe at the centre of the revolutionary fever in Pairs, thus this escapeism proved his counter revolutionary sentiment. This indeed “opened the citizesn’ eyes”, and seaked his fate, as now the people of France had clear evidence of Louis’s lack of support for the revolution. Thus

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When King Charles I dismissed Parliament in 1629, he was set on the idea of a personal rule without any help from Parliament. This he could manage, as long as he avoided war. His aim was to sort out the country's finances, and with the help of Strafford and Laud, impose a 'Policy of Thorough'. This policy was the idea of a fair and paternalistic government with no corruption. However, within 11 years, Charles' personal rule had failed and England was drifting into war. There are mixed opinions on whether this failure was solely due to the actions of the King, or those of third parties, for example, Strafford or Laud.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Battle disasters quickly inflamed revolutionaries who thought the king was in league with the enemies. On August 10, 1792, a crowd of Parisians stormed the royal palace of the Tuileries and slaughtered the king’s guards. The royal family fled to the Legislative Assembly, escaping before the mob arrived. A month later, citizens attacked prisons that held nobles and priests accused of political offenses. About 1,200 prisoners were killed; among them were many ordinary criminals. Historians disagree about the people who carried out the “September massacres.” Some call them bloodthirsty mobs. Others describe them as patriots defending France from its enemies. In fact, most were ordinary citizens fired to fury by real and imagined grievances.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When The King Took Flight

    • 1255 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In June 1791, King Louis XVI and his family snuck out of Paris during the night, hoping to escape from the French Revolution and its violence. He planned to escape the country and return with foreign assistance to reclaim control of France, but the people of Varennes stopped and detained him until authorities arrived and sent him back to Paris. Louis’ attempted escape, in addition to the letter he left behind denouncing the Revolution, “profoundly influenced the political and social climate of France” (223). His escape outraged many people and left the administration in shambles, and this caused tensions to break out. To control the situation, the people of France quickly organized their own authoritative forces. Timothy Tackett argues in When the King Took Flight that Louis XVI’s escape is significant because it destroyed faith in the monarch and amplified the violence of the Revolution but at the same time instilled a new sense of unity among the French.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence for this was that he had placed many troops in Paris. All theses factors and events combined led to in my opinion the first real violent outbreak/journée and the start of the French Revolution or at least the point in the French revolution where Louis could no longer reverse the Revolution, the Storming of the Bastille. This is because it exhibited violent and erratic behaviour among ordinary Parisians. It became irreversible as the king withdrew his troops from Paris, showing the King’s weakness and that violence had been successful (they captured the Bastille, symbol of king’s power and he withdrew his troops from Paris and Necker is recalled as finance minister, he was seen as the only one who could still resolve the economic…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The condition of France alone did not bring about the overthrow of the monarchy… for the…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: Reign of Terror

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “The execution of Louis XVI marked the beginning of the 18 month period of the French Revolution that has come to be called ‘The Reign of Terror’”(49). It was led by no other than Robespierre, in an attempt to start a new government, which proceeded to execute large numbers of people. The 18 months was a blood pouring event during the French Revolution. These events were unnecessary and the whole Reign of Terror was unjustified because it was a sin to kill, they went against what other through and what was right, and they went beyond what was necessary.…

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This revolutionary event in history is most noted for the execution of thousands of citizens under the influence of other rebellious acts that grew popularity at the time. Famously, Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette were included under the list as these were important figures that were deeply involved in French revolutions. Despite this tragedy, this event is often times considered a momentous occasion in French history as it exemplifies the claim that this became the turning point for the outspoken France citizens. In order to acknowledge components of the French Revolution, it is essential to recognize the involvements of previous revolutionary acts, main causes, significant outcomes, recovery or possible solutions, and impacts on modern society.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They got caught in Varennes because they were recognized in a few cities right before they got to Varennes like Sainte-Menehould and Clemont. They were kept in Varennes before it was decided that they were going to be sent back to Paris. The king was trying to make the people of Varennes to do whatever he said but the two years of revolution changed their view of the absolute monarchy. They saw that the country could be ran better without the absolute monarchy so they obeyed the word of the National Assembly instead of the king’s word. The state of the country and the people’s mentality was absolutely changed.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Champs de Mars Massacre was a direct result of the passage of legislation that decreed Louis XVI would remain king under constitutional monarchy, even though he had attempted to leave in the famous "flight of Varennes."…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the chaos of the French Revolution Napoleon's empire, Europe wanted to get back to the old days of monarchy. They reasoned: democracy brought chaos, monarchy brought order.…

    • 3587 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XVI took power when his father, who was the previous ruler, died. Many people did not agree with this because he as a young man at the time and had no experience running a country. King Louis XVI enjoyed the riches that came with being King but he did not have any experience and made random decisions that hurt the common people of the country which made France a target for other countries. King Louis XVI did not know what he was doing, obviously, but he controlled everything. The French people had no say in how their country was ran because the King paid no attention to them. France wanted him executed. Document F shows an image of when King Louis XVI was killed by the guillotine. The image also shows Maximilien Robespierre, another inspiring figure of the American Revolution, holding the king’s head while everybody else was happy and laughing as it was an enjoyable event. This event happened on January 21, 1793 long after King Louis XVI started ruling, so France was still incredibly poor.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History Notes

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It shows that with violence, they get what they want. They were rioting and committing this act for the reasons of the unjust class system known as the three estates. Not only were the mob backed as well by women and most of the third estate but they became aware of something that could be very much of use, knowing how to make the King cower. People had a suspicion of Louis 8th being a woos and this did not at all work in his favor. This could give the mob ideas of how much of a fear they are or how much of a force they could become and what the potential results could be from overthrowing an authoritative power even.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    no i wont

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2012 The DBQ Project ... A Mini Document Based Question (Mini-Q) .... In other words, The Reign of Terror: Was it. justified? 49. This page may be reproduced ...…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Reign of Terror started in 1789 and was a time when supporters of the French Revolution ran wild and started killing non-supporters or counterrevolutionaries. The French held a ceremony if you will, in Paris for the execution of King Louis XVI on January 21, 1793. This was because Louis was having financial, and harvest issues. In June of 1789 King Louis called the Estates Meeting to discuss taxes and money problems. Then some men disliked what Louis was talking about so they stormed out and filed into a tennis court, and vowed not to leave until they created a new constitution. On August 26 “The Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen” was signed and put into action. Not everyone was in favor of this new constitution though. Neighboring countries and the catholic church disliked it because they feared a spread of a revolution and they lost power/property. To deal with their opposition of the “Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen” they wanted to become more “radical”. They were led by chief-prosecutor Robespierre, who found King Louis XVI guilty of crimes against state/treason, and was executed (Doc A), therefore connecting all of these events. Although it helped the government by getting rid of Louis XVI, The Reign of Terror was unjustified because it took away freedom of speech, religion, and killed thousands of people.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays