Preview

The Meaning of "Evil Behind Animals Rights"

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1396 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Meaning of "Evil Behind Animals Rights"
Wyman 1
Misty Dawn Wyman
English 1213-W03
Professor Melanie Tucker
January 31st, 2012
The Meaning of The Evil Behind Animal Rights The text called, 'The Evil of Animal “Rights”', written by Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook, explains why animal testing is important and what animal activist groups have done to keep the testing from occurring. They explain the necessity of animal testing for man kind. The cures of different diseases and cancers, could all be created with the testing on animals-mostly rats and mice. The companies and labs doing these tests, like Huntingdon, which is mentioned in the text, are being harassed and interrupted in their process by animal activist groups, fighting for animal “rights”. According to the authors of this text, well being of man kind lay upon these scientists performing these tests on the animals. Animal testing is an important factor for society. There are many people and groups out there that do not agree with that statement. Scientists use special techniques that involve growing actual skin in labs, which helps burn victims and those with severe skin issues. A common solution to a heart valve replacement comes from a pig. Doctors will use a valve from a pig's heart and place it in a humans heart, in turn saving that persons' life. Scientists have also grown an actual human ear off of the back of a hairless mouse. Once the ear was surgically removed, the mouse remained healthy and lived out it's life (The Bionic Body). The purpose of this text is to give a little insight as to why animal testing is important and what the companies doing this testing go through with animal activist groups. With the animal testing, possible cure for AIDS, other deadly diseases, and maybe cancer lie upon these creatures. The authors try to explain that the animal activist groups are trying their best to keep this from happening.
Wyman 2
Companies like Huntingdon test new products on animals like mice and rats before they deemed safe and



Cited: Animal Rights Uncompromised: 'Pets ' http://www.peta.org/about/why-peta/pets.aspx,, James, Missy and Merickel, Alan P. Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook, The Evil of Animal “Rights”, Reading Literature and Writing Argument, Fourth Edition by, pg. 604-605. The Bionic Body http://www.pbs.org/saf/1107/features/body.htm Why is PETA Killing Thousands of Rescued Pets? http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/peter-worthington/peta-kills-animals_b_1296370.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Regan, Tom. "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 336-40. Print.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general public as well as animals are put at a severe disadvantage as a result of the rules created by the politically elite. Those who are vulnerable in society: animals deemed useful and people who are economically disadvantaged, experience the most severe injustice, in part due to inadequate representation. There is no perceptible correlation between legislature, and mercy. The social justice movement is as strong as ever, and the discrepancy between laws passed and the need for basic human and animal rights has become more ubiquitous in modern culture. Bryan Stevenson’s Just Mercy, Una Chadhuri and Holly Hughes’s Animal Acts, and multiple articles that identify key issues pertaining to animal and human rights. As illustrated through…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author argues inherent value. Regan points out animals should be able to experience life with inherent value of their own. Addressing commercial animal agriculture, the author declares "The fundamental moral wrong here is not that animals are kept in stressful close confinement or in isolation, or that their pain and suffering, their needs and preferences are ignored or discounted." Regan continues the only way to right the wrong would be to stop…

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epstein and Brook attempt to persuade the reader into believing animal rights are bad for society. They highlight many positive influences of animal testing, and explain to the reader the global implications of discontinuing testing. The logic offered is reasonably sound in theory, though it is a bit too harshly worded at times. Although evidence of the constructive qualities of medical testing on animals is provided,…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Animal Testing

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Animal testing has been going on for a couple of years now. Scientists use animal testing as a form of “safe” testing. According to Humane Society International, animal testing is, “Procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into the basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals. (1)” Many companies use animal testing because it is easier, or more ethical, to…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Millions of animals , millions of needles, and millions of failed tests . For years animal testing has been a brimming controversy for many . Some people believe that there is no harm in animal testing while others seeme to think that it is corrupt. Animal testing is in fact opprobrious and an immense threat to animals . According to Philosopher Jeremy Bentham the questions is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk . But, can they suffer ? ( qtd in Isacat 187)…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The clash between the animal rights activists and researchers over the issue of, whether animals should be allowed to be studied in research labs, or not, is constantly debated. The heavily accepted plea of the animal rights activists to remove animals from testing is a completely preposterous goal, and when looked further in to, have extreme flaws and negative adverse effects on scientific progress and the world. Because of this, scientific research on animals should continue until other sustainable means are developed and the negative effects of the current “solutions” are resolved.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Persuasive Paper

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Attention Getter: Do you imagine the pet that you love being being use for test? Relevance: Although some people agree that animal testing is fine,but I strongly dislike the idea of the cruelty with the animal Credibility: According to Peta ’s fact sheet, they argue that ‘In many cases, animal studies do not just hurt animals and waste money, they kill people too.’” Thesis: Animal testing should be banned from United States. Preview: I will be discussing about animal testing and other options available. I have always felt strongly about animal rights, and cruelty to animals. Transition: Animal testing is the study, experimentation and research of any animal. Animal rights activists are opposed to using animals for medical research and experimentation because humans do not have the right to use animals. I. Animal rights Transition: Finding cures for humans and testing in animals. II. Animal testing Transition: In conclusion, A. Animal testing is not reliable and is very expensive. Animal testing is inhumane and now that there are alternatives to this, there is no excuse for anyone to still commit this act. Animal testing should be banned in America. I suggest that governments fully ban animal testing, so that the world becomes a better and safer place for both animals and humans.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the FDA encourages manufacturers to conduct whatever testing is necessary to ensure the safety of their products, it does not specifically require the use of animals. (FDA) The FDA actually encourages companies to consider alternatives before deciding that testing on animals is necessary. They advocate that research and testing for products use a maximum amount of useful scientific information and a minimal number of animals tested. When testing does occur, they advocate for the most humane methods available. The Food and Drug Administration supports the Animal Welfare Act and the Public Health Service Policy of Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. If companies are not required by the FDA to test their products on animals, there is no reason that it should be a method that is resorted to for experimentation.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At this moment, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside cold, tiny cages in laboratories across the world. They suffer in pain, ache with loneliness and long to roam free. Instead, all they can do is sit and wait in fear of the next terrifying and painful procedure that will be performed on them. The stress, sterility and boredom causes some animals to develop neurotic behavior such as incessantly spinning in circles or even pulling out their own hair and biting their own skin. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed. The unfortunate aspect is that many of these animals received tests for products that will never actually see approval or public consumption and use. It is this aspect of animal testing that many view as a major negative against the practice. This aspect seems to show the idea that animals die in vain because no direct benefit to humans occurred from the animal testing. The two articles that present benefits of animal testing are “Animal Testing Pros” written by Ranjan Shandilya and “Human Benefits of Animal Testing” by Russel Huebsch. Each of these authors has an interesting stand on the issue and presents some valuable information about animal testing. Although their arguments are mostly convincing, it is an issue that has to be examined on both sides. Is killing helpless animals a necessity or privilege? Would the world come to an end if we stopped animal testing? I do not think so.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Testing Final Draft

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Annually, more than 100.000 animals are used for test product’s security included household cleaners, cosmetics and pharmaceutical products (PETA Fact Sheet). For many years, the application of animals has been considered to be a normal strategy in three primary fields: biomedical research, education and product safety evaluation. In 2009, it was estimated that approximately, 3.6 million animals were used for testing and were killed after experiments; about 2.7 million of them were not administered with anesthesia. Animal welfare groups are pressuring world governments to take steps to reduce their reliance on animal experiments and to inflict strict regulations on animal testing (Government-Required Animal Testing: Overview).…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics:Animal Testing

    • 2832 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The 21st century world has greatly advanced in all realms thanks to immense research that has produced inventions and innovations that have made planet earth a better habitable place. However, in the realm of biological research, an ethical public discourse has ensued over the use of animal testing by pharmaceutical companies, universities, farms, medical schools, defense departments, and commercial establishments among other institutions (Jones, 2013). In this case, animal testing refers to the utilization of invertebrates and non-human vertebrates as test objects for products destined for human use. For example, animal testing can be used to evaluate safety and potency of medical treatments and toxicity of products among other uses (Jones, 2013). Although there seems to be divergent views held by animal activists on one side and scientific realm on the other, there is a need to find a solution to the problem. This paper aims to critically evaluate the ethical debate on animal testing highlighting the possible solution to this debacle.…

    • 2832 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The US National Institute of Health spends $14 billion out of their $31 billion annual budget on animal researching(Humane Society International; Conlee; US National Institutes of Health). Animal testing has become a very controversial topic to discuss. Experimenting on animals is cruel because even though there are alternative ways to test people still believe that testing on the animals is a better way to do things. Acts of cruelty against the animals, and the fact that animals are different from humans seem to be big issues in the controversy. There are alternative ways to test for products other than testing the animals. There have been horrible acts of animal cruelty that violates the Animal Welfare Act’s laws, and the last…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Every life created by god is equal, And a huge amount of people Have been no animal testing users. They strongly propose that animals shall not be used in scientific researches, Experiment animals are protective walls of human’s health. They are routinely cut open, poisoned and then caged in for weeks, months and sometimes even years! Some animals are often given diseases to see weather a new drug will work or it has side effects.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, people might think it's better to test on animals first for humans’ safety, but why test a product that is meant for humans on an animal? The results will most likely not be the same as a human’s and could make it more dangerous for them. For example, smoking was thought to be harmless because animals didn't have a negative effect to it yet thousands of people continue to smoke and die because it caused cancer.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays