Preview

The Meaning of Intention in English Criminal Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1273 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Meaning of Intention in English Criminal Law
The law generally requires that the accused possess a ‘blameworthy’ state of mind at the time the act comprising the offence was committed, and the basic presumption is that mens rea is required for every offence (‘actus non fit reus nisi mens sit rea’), authority for which stems from Sherras v De Rutzen [1895] –

“There is a presumption that mens rea … is an essential ingredient in every offence; but that presumption is liable to be displaced either by the words of the statute creating the offence or by the subject matter with which it deals, and both must be considered.”

This proposition, that mens rea is the default position for an offence unless its implication is clearly outweighed by other factors, was secured in Sweet v Parsley [1970]. Per Lord Reid: “it is universal principle that if a penal provision is reasonably capable of two interpretations, that interpretation which is most favourable to the accused must be adopted.” Thus the requirement of intention is presumed where a matter is uncertain. However, many statutes do not use the language of ‘knowingly’ or ‘intentionally’ acting; in the case of such strict liability offences, usually regulatory offences without the “disgrace of criminality”[1], there is no element of intent whatsoever for the prosecution to establish.[2]

Normally, an objective view of mens rea, where the defendant fails to recognise the risk of his acts where a reasonable person would have done so, (recklessness in the Caldwell sense) cannot be said to constitute intention. Rather, a subjective, purposive view of intent encompasses the intention to act or to cause a consequence, or foresight or awareness of a risk of acting or causing the consequence (Cunningham [1957]). For the majority of offences, recklessness will suffice for a conviction, but some do require proof of an intent, including murder (an intent to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm), theft, burglary, and wounding with intent. For the distinction between

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, it is the job of the prosecution to then establish whether she also has the mens rea for her Victims’ murder. The mens rea for murder is the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. There are two types of intention: direct intention and oblique intention. Direct intention as defined by James LJ in Mohan6 is the “decision” to bring about a “particular consequence” no matter whether the Defendant “desired that consequence or not”. In the words of R.A. Duff7 direct intent can be construed from the Defendant’s actions if the Defendant would consider himself a “failure” if the “relevant consequence” did not occur. Lydia stated that she had no “malice” whatsoever to Danielle or Gemma and only intended to scare Jasmine. By applying Mohan8 it is clear that Lydia did not make the decision to throw the law reports in order to kill Danielle and would not consider herself to have failed if her actions did not cause the death of Danielle. Therefore, Lydia did not display direct intent to kill Danielle and whether or not Lydia displayed oblique intent must be explored. The cases of R v Maloney9 and Hancock and Shankland10 provided some confusion on what degree of foresight was required for a jury to infer intention from a Defendant’s actions. In Nedrick11 it was established that the jury should ask how “probable” the consequences from the Defendant’s voluntary act were and if…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack, Bert and Pratt

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case, the court dismissed the charge of the attempt of murder of Bert because Jack could not have killed Bert due to the malfunction of his gun. The court was not right by dismissing the attempt murder charge because he had the intent to kill Bert and he even fired his weapon towards him but ended up killing Pratt. All the tree elements of an attempt were present plus it also meets the mens rea of attempt. It meets the mens rea because Jack intentionally performed an act that was proximate to the completion of a crime, and by possessing the intent or purpose to achieve a criminal objective. In addition meets the actus reus of attempt because he came extremely close to the commission of the crime. In addition he killed Pratt while pointing the gun at Bert with the intent to kill him.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bert and Jack Scenario

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are three major elements that are required to be present in order for an attempt of a criminal act to take place. The first is the actual intent to commit the crime itself. The second element states that there must be an act or acts that take place towards committing the crime. Lastly, the attempt at the crime must have failed (Lippman, 2012, p.178). Along with the three elements, both mens rea and actus reus must be present. There are two determining factors when deciding if mens rea is present: the intent to commit the crime and intentionally performing acts that come close to completing the crime (Lippman, 2012, p.178). In addition there are three tests to determine if there is actus reus present. The first test is the physical proximity test. This…

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HSC Legal Studies

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Strict liability offences can only be successfully defended if the accused can prove that that the actual act did not occur as mens rea is irrelevant to this category of offences.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw V Thomas

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    11.45 Section 48(3) of the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) attempts to give some guidance on the meaning of…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sef Gonzales Report

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a crime to occur, both elements of the crime, Actus Reus and mens rea must be present. Actus Reus and mens rea are legal terms used to define a crime. Both elements must be present for an accused to be found guilty of a crime (except for strict liability). Mens rea means that the person must have had a guilty mind at the time of committing the crime- that is they must have intended to commit the crime.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ii. And result crimes (series of events) – a forbidden consequence results from the physical conduct (eg. A death). Usually you have to prove Mens Rea for all parts of the series of events (eg. Murder – intention to do the act and intention to cause death)…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the main areas pointed out by the Law Commission was the bit by bit development of the law leading to a lack of coherence. This lack of coherence can be seen in the uncertain meaning of ‘intention’. Intention is a vital element of murder in regards to proving D having the sufficient mens rea. Despite multiple attempts by the House of Lords to explain what effect foresight of consequences has; s8 CJA 1967 it is still unclear. In Moloney it was ruled foresight of consequences was not intention; it was only evidence from which intention could be inferred. However, in the case of Woolin the HoL spoke of intention being found from foresight of consequences. This left it unclear whether it is a substantive rule of law or a rule of evidence and the following case of Mathews ad Alleyne confused matters more after stating there was little difference between the two. In my view this could be resolved if a definition of foresight of consequences was provided in a statutory definition; making applying the law easier for jury’s.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a. True b. False 12. What is mens rea: guilty mind 13. What is Actus Rea: guilty act 14. What is concurrence: both guilty mind and act 15. In the Defense of Justification, one agrees they committed the act a. true b. False 16.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aware of this crime be interpreted as an intentional while doing a misconduct. Note that in criminal law, criminal consciousness is completely separated from the intent, motive of the suspects. The deliberate criminal prosecution easily prove if the suspect knows his behavior will be dangerous but still do it. When considering factors intentionally committing a crime, the court must consider the West suspects more aspects when action really "want" specific consequences or not. For example, in the murder, the "want" or "do not want" deaths can switch from willful murder (death) to manslaughter (in prison). This is a very difficult field to prove and…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    both the act, or actus rea, and the intent to commit the act, or mens rea.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal justice

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    e. How does the Model Penal Code different from common law requiring the mens rea requirement?…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prosecution establishes this by proving the accused carried out this act by using witness testimony and physical evidence. Mens rea is a term meaning the ‘guilty mind’ of the accused’s mental state. The prosecution establishes this by proving that the accused to the necessary degree intended to commit the crime.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Impact on actus reus (victim’s actual consent/ non-consent) and mens rea (offender’s understanding of consent / non-consent)…

    • 2265 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics