On April 18, 1931, Thomas, J Pressley witnessed a man hanging from a limb. The newspaper article title states ‘Mob Lynches Negro in Court House Yard”. It stated that the mob of whites’ march into the jailhouse took out George Smith a Negro and hang him from a tree. That is when Mr. Pressely saw him hanging. The reason he hung is that a white girl at that time stated that he came into her room and tried to attack her and she scratched him in his face. So, when he was found the white girl pointed him out as his assailant. Mr. Pressel sated this was his first time seeing a dead body or even someone being lynched.…
The appellant’s speech included phrases such as “We're not a revengent organization, but if our President, our Congress, our Supreme Court, continues to suppress the white, Caucasian race, it's possible that there might have to be some revengeance taken.” The appellant was not seen handling firearms. The film did capture many phrases of racist and violent remarks.…
Mr. Wipf, I know you couldn’t read “The Flag is Drenched with Our Blood” because you don’t have enough articles, so let me quickly summarize it for you: Charles Blow recounts every evil that has ever befallen the black community in America since they were taken from their homes in Africa. It’s a complete ad misericordium; he presents no line of thought that connects the situation in modern black America with any of those events of the past (eg. segregation, lynchings, slavery). All he says is that since blacks were once slaves, “how dare” we criticize their current actions. It’s complete sensationalism and emotionally-charged to the point of denying fact. Of course we can all agree blacks suffered great evils in the past.…
Their leader Shaka had planted all his ideas and teachings into the Zulu people and because of him, they had this fearless persona about them to. All they were known for was wreaking havoc and growing their already growing empires with trained a killer, which was going to be a problem. I resented the British Laws that was passed to abolish slavery. If they never passed these laws things would have never changed and this would have never stroked their already growing egos. These laws caused us Boers to revolt and try to escape British rule. This was one of the key opponents that lead us into battle with the Zulu people. These ignorant, blood-thirsty, man slaying, people are dangerous. They start countless wars and make a lot of enemies which would hurt them because they were creating countless enemies. The only thing that they know how to do is how to kill and to start war amongst themselves, when we were trying to compromise with them. We was only trying to teach these barbaric people some of our ways and to civilize them, trying to help the blacks of the South Africa. All the “Great” King of The Zulu Land had to do was disband his military and recognize Britain’s authority, or face invasion. As usual they chose what they knew how to do best, which was how to start war. The same British people that passed the slave abolishing law for these people they were now going into war with them. So not only did they have wars with Boers they also had war with the British now to, how ironic. Even though I despise these people they were very courageous. It’s almost funny how the Zulu’s thought they could defeat us with their sticks. They knew that they could not have stopped us with their assegai which was basically a spear, while we…
They made their killings public which made the community way more vulnerable and no one could do anything about it because most-white officials like doctors, lawyer's and even…
It is established that there are conflicting perspectives between past and present, with people of the present having a greater understanding of the implications of apartheid. However, some are still ignorant - shown when a woman tries to give a Springbok Jersey to a young African child. Another lady informs her “If he wears it, he will get beaten up. For them, Springbok still represents apartheid.” Within this scene, the director uses positioning to held audience understand tensions, and close ups to show the confusion on the woman’s face and the shock of the boy. This small scene is representative of how some white Africans are trying to reach out, but still do not understand the existing implications of…
For Gordimer, Dr. von Leinsdorf’s apathy and inherent racism are manifestations of the rejection that characterized apartheid in South Africa. In her essay, “1959: What is Apartheid?”, Gordimer writes, “In all of a black man’s life, all his life, rejection by the white man has the last word. With his word of rejection apartheid began, long before it hardened into laws and legislation, long before it became a theory of racial selectiveness and the policy of a government.”…
As a result of this feeling, we put up a façade and often act out in extraordinary ways, ultimately causing conflict. An example of this can bee seen through the character of Jimmy Kruger. Despite his devious and deceitful ways, it is clear his actions where not only out of spite, but also out of fear. Predominantly fear of racial equality, loss of status and authority. Being a white man on a black mans land, Kruger was well aware of the rightful owners of South Africa. In addition with the uprise of the Black Consciousness movement, he began to feel a sense of vulnerability. It threatened life as he knew and he was to make certain that such things would not take place.…
Gordimer used irony in both stories “The Moment Before the Gun Went Off” and “Once Upon a Time”. Irony played an essential role in these short stories and coincidentally, they both ended with a similar conclusion, the death of a family member. Moreover, both stories revealed Gordimer’s visions of post-apartheid. Sadly, due to Gordimer's description of South African apartheid, the South African government censored her books. In “Once Upon a Time”, irony was extremely pronounced, however, in “The Moment Before the Gun Went Off”, it was vague.…
I agree with Mark Mathabane on the hatred because apartheid is unfair. It’s not fair everyone doesn’t get treated the same because of skin color. I agree because learning to hate is easy being treated that way especially in your own country. Blacks would get accused for anything or everything with no privacy at all. I would follow under Mandela’s lead, whatever it takes to get peace and equality. That’s not right blacks not getting treated right in their own country. Overall I agree with him because it’s not right to be treated different and whatever it takes to stop apartheid.…
During the times of the apartheid movement, State sponsored killings were popular forms of violence that claimed lives of many civilians, military workers, and bystanders. Nowadays, violence has calmly absolved. However, there is still political violence that exists in our current society that dates back to the times of the holocaust, where Jews were undergoing physical and mental torture under the hands of Nazi leader, Adolf Hitler. Genocide was a popular form of State sponsored violence that has continued after the end of the apartheid period in 1993. With this type of killing, ethnic groups were targeted and attacked. In the documentary, Scream Bloody Murder, a local news blog, CNN, portrays different types of State Sponsored killings that…
Marais Van der Vyver is an afrikaner farmer, living in South Africa during the end of the apartheit regime. Furthermore he has title as the regional Party leader and commandant of the local security command. The people from his district remember how he as child was rather shy and withdrawn, and it seems that the people around him beleives that he has conserved these personality traits as an adult. Nevertheless he exposes his feelings at the police station when repporting the hunting mishap, where he accidently shoots one of his black farm labours.…
The South African extremist and previous president Nelson Mandela (1918-2013) conveyed a conclusion to politically-sanctioned racial segregation and has been a worldwide promoter for human rights. An individual from the African National Congress party starting in the 1940s, he was a pioneer of both serene dissents and furnished resistance against the white minority's severe administration in a racially isolated South Africa. His activities landed him in jail for about three decades and made him the substance of the antiapartheid development both inside his nation and universally. Discharged in 1990, he took an interest in the destruction of politically-sanctioned racial segregation and in 1994 turned into the principal dark president of South…
This victimization of blacks is, in fact, far from being one sided. Just like they were oppressed and suppressed by external forces, they also contributed to their own subjugation, by internalizing the colonial discourse advocated by the Apartheid in order to preserve the status quo. The long years of silencing all kinds of revolt and blocking all attempts to proving the blacks’ well being had affected greatly and negatively the blacks’ existence and it was their silence and submissive reactions towards their bitter reality which aggravated their situation and exacerbated their traumatization. The prevailing atmosphere which favorised the white privilege led to a number…
Francine found a white envelope with nothing written on the front under the pile of books when she’s cleaning her table. She opened it curiously, and there was a letter in it. She was so shocked when she saw the familiar handwriting of her best friend, Ashley. A tear rolled down her cheek after she read a few lines. It all started like this.…