Preview

The Most Dangerous Game: Zaroff

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
932 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Most Dangerous Game: Zaroff
In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” the author, Richard Connell, does an outstanding job of portraying the bizarre adventure of an insane, however experienced hunter, General Zaroff. The protagonist, Rainsford, another experienced hunter from New York City, appears on General Zaroff’s island, explores, and eventually encounters with Zaroff. They introduce themselves, settle down, and begin to talk. During the talk with the general, Rainsford soon learns that the General was not only a hunter; but a murderer as well. Zaroff has lured and ceased many sailors to his island to play a game. Although, they did not hunt with the General, the General hunted them! Zaroff claimed that hunting “had become too easy”, therefore, hunting began to bore him (Connell 21).The General began to murder every single one of his victims as if he were actually hunting an animal. General Zaroff did not have any form of regretfulness or discomfort which clearly shows insanity. General Zaroff’s character is clearly sadistic and manipulative and makes the hunting of animals into a thrilling, immoral game of hunting of human life. Zaroff is well kept and handsome; it appears as if he takes care of himself vigorously. He may seem noble but he is actually two-faced, arrogant, deceiving, and fearless. He lives life to please himself and he is able to do so because of his wealth. In his own conniving way, he is intelligent as he speaks in a sarcastic and almost innocent way, as if he really is. General Zaroff thinks, “The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure,” (Connell). Zaroff believes that he as power over everybody and that he is the “strong”; so why shouldn’t he “use his gift”.(Connell 21) He pursues excitement in hunting, to do so he chooses to hunt a new animal which no animal could compare with it for an instant (Connell 21). Zaroff wants more then just a “hunt”; he wants a competition or an adventure of some sort. He wants the amusement of watching all


Cited: Connell, Richard. ”The Most Dangerous Game”. Elements of Literature. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 2003. 13-28. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Richard Connell the author of the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” craftily used foreshadowing to suggest that General Zaroff was a cannibal. For example, in the exposition, Rainsford and Whitney discussed Ship-Trap Island and mentioned the word cannibal two times during this brief conversation: “‘Cannibals?’ suggested Rainsford. ‘Hardly. Even cannibals wouldn’t live…’” (Connell 2). While the significance of this repetition is not evident until later in the story when readers meet General Zaroff and learn that he hunts humans for sport, the use of repetition by an author is usually purposely done and often indicates hints or clues for the reader to pay attention to. In another example of foreshadowing, Connell describes General Zaroff…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    General Zaroff is a man who has hunted every kind of animals. He doesn’t have……

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Cornell, Zaroff reveals strength, ingenuity, and a selfishness through his murderous and questionable methods of hunting.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is a story about a hunter, Rainsford, who finds a deserted island, where he meets General Zaroff who too shares an interest in hunting. On this island, General Zaroff hunts humans that have had the misfortune to end up on his island. Although Zaroff lives in a very civilized home with electricity and fancy food, Zaroff himself is a very uncivilized being. In the story, General Zaroff is explaining to Rainsford why he hunts humans. “...If I wish to hunt, why should I not? I hunt the scum of the earth...a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than the score of them.” (Connell, 64). Zaroff is saying that it is okay to hunt people if you are better than them. He does not value human life. This makes…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford is a man who is trapped on a island where they hunt humans. He begins the story as being a hunter and had no understanding of what the animals he hunted felt, but towards the end he understands what it feels like as he is hunted. His dynamic personality and behavior shows that Rainsford is quick-witted, talented, and level-headed.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Rainsford first meets Zaroff, Zaroff is courteous, hospitable, and honorable; he takes Rainsford in, gives him clothes, dinner, wine, and a place to stay. However throughout the course of the evening and dinner, Zaroff's character takes a drastic and radical darkening. "The weak [men] of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure," (Connell 799) says Zaroff over a glass of wine. "I am strong," (Connell 799) he continues to say. Zaroff hunted captured humans as a hobby and a sport! Rainsford is appalled at this, and Zaroff eventually continues to tell Rainsford of his intention to hunt him: "You'll find this game worth playing...Your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" (Connell 801). Zaroff is so corrupt that he doesn't even understand what he is doing is wrong; he appears so nice on the outside, but his words and actions show his…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    General Zaroff is uncivilized because he does not value human life. He constantly uses others for his own enjoyment, with no regard for their well-being. For one thing, when Rainsford confronts Zaroff about his behavior, Zaroff argues that “‘Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needed, to be taken by the strong… I am strong. Why should I not use my gift?’” (8).…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout all the articles and stories I’ve read, I believe that all lives matter. In any situation, emergency, or life problems, all lives matter. It doesn’t matter what you did, whether it be good, or bad. By God, we were all created equal. So suppose you were a firefighter that was on call during the 9/11 attack in New York. And you were faced with a situation where you had to either save the 57 year old receptionist or would you save the 19 year old mail boy? Or would you risk calling in backup to save both, but have the risk of not saving either or. These are the types of questions we have to ask ourselves daily.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zaroff's outlook on hunting is that of a murderous man. After he becomes board with hunting animals had nothing but his legs and his instinct. Instinct is no match for his reason. So Zaroff hunts the one game that has the ability to reason humans. He somehow justifies hunting and killing men by saying Life is for the strong to be lived by the strong and if needs be taken by the strong. The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure. I am strong. Why should I not use my gift. If I wish to hunt why should I not. I hunt the scum of the earth sailors from tramp blacks Chinese whites mongrels a purebred horse or hound is worth more than a score of them.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "The Most Dangerous Game," Zaroff explains to Rainsford that he hunts humans over a drink. He says, "It's gives me pleasure. They…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Everyday I hunt, and I never grow bored now, for I have a quarry of which I can match my wits, (8).” Zaroff speaks his mind about how bored he is with hunting animals. Rainsford hunts animals because he loves the sport of hunting. “It’s the best sport in the world,” as Rainsford calls it. Considering what both men say, it shows they have different morals about hunting and life. Those two points of view about hunting go against each other as Zaroff challenges Rainsford to hunt. Another main way General Zaroff and Rainsford aren’t alike is that General Zaroff believes that humans are on the Earth to provide himself entertainment and Rainsford believes they deserve respect. General Zaroff says, “ I hunt the scum of the Earth: sailors from tramp ships--lassars, blacks, Chinese, Whites, mongrels--...,(9).” To rephrase it, Zaroff obviously gives no consideration about human life as he shows in the story. Rainsford believes the opposite of that, he says, “But they are men, (9).” in response to what Zaroff says.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Only when in the place of the prey does he understand the fear and terror felt when pursued by the reaper. Compounding the mania experienced by Rainsford is the fact that he cannot plead ignorance. He has been the predator countless times, pursuing his living quarry with religious zeal, and he knows how this encounter ends all too often. The antagonist, General Zaroff, has grown bored of traditional hunts and sought out “the only animal with reason” (Connell). Killing men for entertainment, or “sport”, may seem barbaric to most civilized people. But many other deaths occur daily from trivial pursuits from the running of the bulls in Pamplona to the ski slopes in the Alps. Furthermore, if the General seems desensitized to the destruction of human life, this doubtless stems from his service as a Cossack officer, where killing men was compulsory and undoubtedly an adrenaline-fueled adventure. The “legitimate” killing in war very well may have given him the taste for his “barbaric” hunts. To hunt is to kill with the intention of sport. This fictionalized anecdote illustrates that the killing in itself is neither good nor bad, but judged so by the killer. When General Zaroff was hunting enemies of the Russian state in the Caucus Mountains, were those kills more honorable than his forays into his private “game reserve”? Would the General’s killings be more legitimate if he declared himself the monarch of his small island, and wrote out an ultimatum against all who washed up on his shores? Upon closer examination line used to distinguish killings…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What stage is General Zaroff? Lawrence Kohlberg is a professor of psychology at Harvard University. He interviewed people and observed their behaviors, based on his research he made the theory of moral development. This theory states that there are six stages of moral development that people go through, an infant beginning at stage zero and growing up into a different stage. In The Most Dangerous Game, by Richard Connell, a man named Rainsford is stranded on an island and is hunted by General Zaroff, the owner of the island who hunts human for sport. While hunting Rainsford General Zaroff displays stage zero transitioning stage one in many ways.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although they both like to hunt, one will end up hunting the other. Zaroff is tired of hunting animals and his idea of hunting changes. “I wanted the ideal animal to hunt,” explained the general, “So I said: ‘What are the attributes of an ideal quarry?’ And the answer was, of course. ‘It must have courage, cunning, and, above all, it must be able to reason.’”(page 30). In story Zaroff is tired of hunting animals because he wants something that can reason.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ending the Dangerous Game

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The next day, Rainsford woke up to the smell of honeysuckle essence, he felt like a new man in “his bed”. He remembered what happened last night to General Zaroff, how he tried to compromise with him “oh but general a deal is a deal” Rainsford had told General Zaroff, “your right my good sir but you see I am a man who says what might be important and useful…. and this deal I made with you does not settle with me….now I would like to give you a much better deal my good ma-“. Shattering glass is all he heard before he pushed Zaroff through the window and then heard a THUNCK “ohhhhhhh…….get away from me you putrid foul beasts…..nooooooo, ahhhhh get away…..nooooooo ahhhhhhhh-“. Is all he heard before he heard ripping, tearing, crunching of bones and flesh……he leaned to see what was left, but he stopped himself?…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays