Preview

The movie “12 Angry Men”

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
713 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The movie “12 Angry Men”
Tajhe Lamarre
12 Angry men The movie “12 Angry Men” displays many well orchestrated examples of the terms Pathos, Ethos, and Logos. Through this film many topics arise in order to reach a verdict on a young mans life. The boy was on trial for murder, and most of the evidence at first glance made him look guilty. Twelve jurors must reach a unanimous decision in order to convict this young man, but the task seems to be more difficult to accomplish as one of the men fights in the boys favor. one could agree that a person is (for the most part) smart and can make responsible decisions, but when you have a group of people the way that they make decisions is much different. The man dubbed “Bubba” has a strong siding in the belief of the people, Bubba uses the emotion of the masses to fuel has arguments. The boy on trial is from a rough area where it is common to believe is a breeding ground for crooks and criminals, and any person with a brain could see truth behind that. It is unrealistic that you can sift through the evil and find the few good apples in the bunch, any person could agree with that. Bubba takes the values of an entire audience and uses them in his arguments; nobody can say that he is wrong but at the same time what he is preaching is not right either. Morally Bubba is a cold- heartless bastard who doesn't not fully understand the gravity of his decision, but since his argument is tied so deeply within the heart of his audience it can't go unnoticed The man that goes by the name of “Slum Guy” brings experience that none of the other jurors can bring to the case. Slums is also from a rougher part of town similar to our defendant. Slums has experience from growing in these areas and is living proof that not everyone born from the gutter becomes a criminal. The stereo that Bubba pleads quickly loses weight as Slums is living proof against it. Slums also brings knowledge to the case about the murder weapon. He points out that the knife used in the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Jurors 3/10 Different Essay Example
    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    12 Angry Jurors 3/10 Different Essay Example

    On the other hand, juror 10 is a loud mouthed, racist bigot. He scolds people he doesn’t agree with and a low opinion of people living in slum areas. Juror #10 is the character who brings in the most prejudice to the jury room as he has formed his decision from the moment he saw the young boy and sees no reason for him to waste any time debating on whether the defendant is guilty. His prejudice comes from the fact he used to live in the “slums” and considers people like the defendant to be “trash”. This is established when he states “well take a look at them…you can’t believe a word they say…they act different… they don’t need any big excuse to kill someone. (59) This man is very…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview
    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis
    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    The first Juror to votes not guilty in the initial vote is the old white man who works as an architect. As when sitting on his office and drawing blueprints for constructing a building, He was very quiet and respectful in the room. He wasn’t convinced that the boy is innocent, but he wants to compare what’s really happened with the testimony’s evidence. At the end of the film he introduces himself to one of the jurors as Davis. He is free of prejudice, and he believes in justice for all. Although in his job he can be sure about the construction material and similar things,…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juror 4 In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juror 4 In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

    He believes that Juror 8 and Juror 9’s input is driven by biases that are “a bit far-fetched” (Act I, page 32). However, Juror 8, as the center of the discussion, constructively points out certain aspects of the case the makes Juror 4 skeptical about Juror 8’s statements. For example, when Juror 8 wonders how long it takes for an elevated train to pass a given point, Juror 4 inquisitively states, “All right. Say ten Seconds. What are you getting at?” (Act I, page 34). This conveys that he understands that Juror 8 has a point to make, but his intentions are not truly rational in accordance with the facts. Furthermore, Juror 4 claims “You’ve made some excellent points. The last one… was very persuasive. But I still believe the boy is guilty of murder. I have two reasons. One: the evidence given by the woman across the street who actually saw the murder committed. Two: the fact that the woman described the stabbing…” (Act II, page 66). According to Juror 4, the woman’s claim makes logical sense. Although Juror 4 is not yet convinced that the young man is not a murderer, he does value Juror 8’s…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

    Juror Three has a strong prejudice for the murder because he has a similar experience with his son. He transfer his anger to the suspect, and keep his prejudice for the murder is guilty. Because Juror Three’s…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Text Essay
    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men Text Essay

    Biased testimony towards the defendant resulted in a prejudice jury. Very frequently, statements like ‘We heard the facts, didn’t we?’ or ‘Pay attention to the facts’ are expressed in the jury room. The 4th Juror cited that the murder weapon was a knife so unique that ‘the storekeeper who sold it to him identified the knife in court and said it was the only one of its kind he ever had in stock.’ The 8th Juror argues that ‘It’s possible that the boy lost the knife and that someone else stabbed his father with a similar knife.’ None of the Juror’s believes this possibility as they have already established their prejudices against the accused. The 10th Juror says ‘Let’s talk facts. These people are born to lie… They think different. They act different.’ These are not ‘facts’ but prejudice opinions made by the 10th Juror about the socio-economic status of the boy. It can assumed that the ‘facts’ presented in this case can be viewed as biased opinions and reports that impairs the true facts.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Carl Lee Jury Trial
    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Carl Lee Jury Trial

    Cobb, one of the victim's mom, she says he was 23 when he was killed and she saw him die. As for the defense they attempt to ask her how many people her son raped or kidnapped in the 23 years he was alive. The judge instructs her not to answer that question and the prosecution's objection is accepted, the jury is also told to disregard the last question. The second witness is Sheriff Walls who is black, which is important because blacks tend to help out other blacks as you’ll see. Prosecution just asks the sheriff to I.D. the murder weapon and to tell whether or not the prints matched the prints of Lee and they did. Next, the defense asks the sheriff arrested Cobb before the murder and he said yes for rape and attempted murder. The rednecks also signed a paper saying that they did do both of those things which the sheriff was not supposed to say yes to, but he did. The jury was instructed by the judge to disregard, but that’s hard to do once he said yes. The third witness is Deputy Looney who was shot by Lee in his act of killing the rednecks. Prosecution questions first asking if he was present at the shooting he says yes, he then asks him how he was shot and he answers by saying I think a bullet bounced off the ground and hit me. They ask him is he got a clear shot at the shooter and the Deputy says no I did not, but that Lee went and apologized to him in the hospital basically admitting it was him. Now it's the defense's turn they ask him if he…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Injustice In To Kill A Mockingbird
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examples Of Injustice In To Kill A Mockingbird

    According to the song, it had all been decided before hand. The District Attorney (D.A.) was “[practicing] all his lines in the mirror.” He knew what the outcome was going to be, and so did everybody else. They must’ve all “read the morning paper, The headline [read] “the man hangs” but the jury doesn’t.” The D.A. doesn’t have to say anything to convince the jury over- a hung jury is an undecided jury-they agree with what the newspaper says. The man is already hung. Just like in TKAM, Tom Robinson had no chance to win. But even if some of the jury isn’t convinced-Mr. Cunningham-the Prosecutor can just “pay to close it like a casket.” Even the witness is payed off he is, “Too well dressed for the witness stand” AKA he just got new clothes. Hmm, maybe a new paycheck?? The defendant has no chance, he either “[Hangs] on a rope, or bated breath.” The death penalty will be served, or the suspense will end him. Game over. To add to the injustice of this case “The press prays for whichever headline is worse.” The accused has nothing going for him. The jury, either they get payed to vote against him, or they agree with the Prosecutor. The witness already got payed off to say the ‘right’ thing; and the press just doesn’t care-unless it will help them sell papers. That dude couldn’t catch a break. The 5 minorities arrested had DNA proof-DNA that is I believe 100% accurate, they were innocent and no amount of arguing could prove it another way-yet they still were convicted. Tom Robinson had the 1930’s version of DNA proof, yet he stood no chance at being…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay
    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    12 Angry Men Essay

    The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the movie unfolds, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities and how they deal with argumentation within groups and critical thinking. This allows Mr. Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr. Vtec
    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mr. Vtec

    The protagonist Jefferson is on his way to go hunting when hie happens to run into one of his brothers friends, along with a friend named bear. Together they all end up at the local liquor store in town. The community of this Southern town is small and everyone knows one another. Not having enough money for the liquer, a common trip, now turns into a robbery. In the mist of all the chaos, they all get shot and killed except Jefferson. Noticing the money in the cash register, he foolishly takes it and gets caught red handed leaving the store. He is charged for this crime and convicted to death by execution. During his trial, the public defender is argueing to the jury of 12, that a black man is no more capable than a hog to plan out this crime. The Jury of 12 white men disagree and sentence Jefferson to death. “Gentlemen of the jury, be merciful. Or God’s sake , be merciful. He is innocent of all charges brought against him” [Don’t sentence him to death] (Gaines 8). Days later Grant Wiggins a plantation schoolteacher looking to change the racism in the South, comes home to find his aunt and Miss Emma, who is Jeffersons Godmother waiting for…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men
    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men

    With eleven of his peers convinced of the accused’s guilt, Juror 8 faced the daunting task of not only persuading the jurors to move past their initial inclinations and prejudices, but also compelling them to deliberate the case in the full interest of justice. In doing so, the first piece of evidence he called into question was the murder weapon itself. According to the prosecution, the boy had bought it the night of the murder after being beaten repeatedly by his abusive father. They then claimed he had showed it off to some friends, headed back home to stab his father, and then finally returned a couple hours later to be arrested by the police. Also called into question was the testimony of the owner of the store from which the boy bought the knife. He not only attested to the fact…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men
    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12 Angry Men

    Juror 10 is clearly motivated by his prejudice. He uses his intolerance to determine his vote for the accused defendant. For instance, in the beginning of Act I, Juror 10 haphazardly said, “ Look at the kind of people they are, you know them,” (13) without even digging deep into the case. It is quite obvious that Juror 10 is generating an “opinion” of the defendant based on the color of his skin and his background. He does not refer to them as regular people, but as “they” and “them” on certain pages. In the courtroom though, no juror is to have any judgments, they are supposed to bring the facts to the table, not their opinions. Juror 10’s outlook of the defendant is blinding him from thinking of any reasonable doubt. Further more, when Juror 10 said, “…I lived among em’ all my life, you can’t believe a word they say. You know that,” he yet again was referring to the defendant’s people as “em” and “they”. You can clearly infer that while Juror 10 was living amongst them, he must have experienced or witnessed situations which has caused him to have judgments on these specific people. These same judgments he brings to the courtroom just add difficulty into solving the case. Following Juror 10’s views further, when Juror 5 was explaining how the person who did stab the father was…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men
    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    12 Angry Men

    Emotion does play a hefty part but facts can overcome any emotions. One of Juror #3’s biggest arguments was the testimony of an old man that lived on the floor below the apartment, where the murder took place. The old man stated in…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To Kill a Mockingbird Essay
    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To Kill a Mockingbird Essay

    Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, all of the evidence we have heard has come to a decision to ruin this Negro’s life for something he has not done. He is being separated from his family just because someone cannot speak up and say what truly happened. Can you, the jury, not see that the evidence given by Mr. Ewell, Ms. Mayella, and Mr. Heck Tate clearly does not match with Mr. Tom Robinson’s testimony? The accusations that have been made towards him are not possible, and they could not have been done by a person who only has the use of his right hand. I truly believe Ms. Mayella is a victim of poverty and ignorance. But my defendant is not guilty but someone in this courtroom is, and what they are doing to this Negro is inhumane. People, what kind of society do we live in? Where racism is being brought. Racism is a thing where people hate and despise a person different from them. Don’t let your prejudice ways get in the way of doing what is right.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men: Film Analysis
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    Twelve Angry Men: Film Analysis

    Twelve angry men is a 1957 American Film that originated from a play of Reginald Rose and has been directed to a film by Sidney Lumet. The movie is not just about the outcome of the trial of a Puerto Rican youth who has been accused of murdering his father, but also shows how the beliefs and attitudes of the twelve jurors lead to his acquittal. Aside from that, this movie also shows Leadership traits that can help every individual on developing their leadership capabilities. The story started when the twelve jurors were put together in a sweltering deliberation room somewhere in America where they have been asked for their verdicts whether to put the child on chair or not. Eleven of them unanimously voted that the youth is guilty and must be…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics