The Muddle Society
Muddle Society I deny the existence of the Empire and its regulations. The idea of organized unitary force is abstract. In my point of view, we are not living in the Empire; we are in the stage of the Muddle society. The Muddle society that is not centralize and well organized, but has full of potential personas with self-determination. The personas include from the bigger picture as nation state actors and non-state actors to smaller vision as an individual with determinations. Throughout the human history, a group of men gathers to form a community. Many communities become a village, and in that village, we choose a leader or the head to lead us. In addition, we combined the villages to form a city. We keep orderly civilize until
…show more content…
For example, Israel and Palestine war, two individual, Israel and Palestine have conflict and they have acted to serve their own interest. In the system, every human has potential to shape his or her kind of a utopian version of the world, as he or she wants it to be. Every human can be counted as one individual because they have impact on the system. For example, Aung San Su Kyi can be counted as an individual with tendency who is civilizing the world. Her actions and ideology has changed some people’s lives, which has shaped the trend of the world in general and Burma in specific. Every individual pursues their own interests in order to stabilize their status. According to the trend, there is no sense of justice or fairness. So, the strong one is more likely to be the winner compared to the weak one. The nature of the Muddle society is a lot similar to Hobbes’s human nature. Individuals are egoistic and they only seek for their own selfness. The strong one is not necessarily the best one because the weak one also has the potential to harm. For example, Osama bin Laden’s attack of the World Trade Center and Pentagon shows that the weak one has the ability to harm the strong one. The shape of the world totally depends on how individual react to each other: in a peaceful way or in a violent way. The current world situation is the game in which people try to
For example, Israel and Palestine war, two individual, Israel and Palestine have conflict and they have acted to serve their own interest. In the system, every human has potential to shape his or her kind of a utopian version of the world, as he or she wants it to be. Every human can be counted as one individual because they have impact on the system. For example, Aung San Su Kyi can be counted as an individual with tendency who is civilizing the world. Her actions and ideology has changed some people’s lives, which has shaped the trend of the world in general and Burma in specific. Every individual pursues their own interests in order to stabilize their status. According to the trend, there is no sense of justice or fairness. So, the strong one is more likely to be the winner compared to the weak one. The nature of the Muddle society is a lot similar to Hobbes’s human nature. Individuals are egoistic and they only seek for their own selfness. The strong one is not necessarily the best one because the weak one also has the potential to harm. For example, Osama bin Laden’s attack of the World Trade Center and Pentagon shows that the weak one has the ability to harm the strong one. The shape of the world totally depends on how individual react to each other: in a peaceful way or in a violent way. The current world situation is the game in which people try to