Preview

Waa Waal's False Dichotomies

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
250 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Waa Waal's False Dichotomies
In the chapter about False Dichotomies, Waal's discussed about four different ideas, which are good aggression, bad peace, the individual & the group and captive vs. field studies. Aggression is unavoidable elements, and it would have significant impact in social structure. Waal states different example in his writing and explains that people tend to categorized themselves in different groups, and act in diverse way. One villagers see another villagers as outsider, and when they have some disagreements, they see others as enemy. To killing enemy or destroying their territories are example of bravery and people believe in victory and feel proud. Waal's argument is that we all have some degree of aggression, which is in practiced throughout the civilization process. Aggression is not necessarily ruthless, it also a means of good for the society. Waal's also argues that, "peace, may be good, the crucial question is good for whom? Everybody wants peace on their own terms." It can be interesting discussion in current international politics. There are many peace builders, such as organizations, government, NGOs, and leaders. Many of them are talking about peace building in different kinds of conflict. However, there is no clear answer about the beneficiaries or parties. Peace for one party may not be real peace. …show more content…
Waal says, "The war is peace rhetoric of Nineteen eighty-four is recognizable in terms such as pacification for wiping out entire villages in Vietnam, 'peacekeeping forces' for the British army in Northern Ireland, and peacekeeper for a deadly missile

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s tone in his essay “Where Do We Go from Here: Chaos or Community” begins as somewhat doubtful of peace. In his essay, King wrote about how many men and the wielders of power peace refuse to do what is required to actually accomplish peace. Also, world leader’s talk passionately about peace, however, those same leaders continue to per sure larger defense budgets, larger armies, and more devastating weapons. These same leaders meet at the peace table, ready to talk peace, but are bearing unsheathed swords. In addition, King delves into the conquerors of the past and also about the atrocities of Hitler and Vietnam.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main ideas represented in this text are Violence versus non-violence/ pacifism versus direct action, relationships, and the clash of cultures.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Barash, David P. Ed. 2000. Approaches to peace: a reader in peace studies. New York : Oxford…

    • 9995 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Through Mimi Abramovitz and Yoosun Park put forward two very different visions of social work. Both authors use historical evidence to support their perspectives, and each perspective contains valid points. Abramovitz argues that the social work profession does not engage enough in social reform efforts, and Park uncovers a dark side in the history of the profession, and concludes that social work may be well intentioned but may cause more harm than good.…

    • 775 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Shadows Of War

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    All through Part five of her book Shadows of War, Carolyn Nordstrom shares her perspectives on war regarding social, physical and mental objectives and rebuffs of such viciousness. To start, one of the main objectives of war as characterized by Nordstrom is an immediate consequence of a risk of loss of control. She clarifies that it is basic for one military to want to decimate another when their control over a specific (arrive range claimed or controlled by somebody) is under risk (56). A fascinating point that Nordstrom makes is identifying with/about (group of individuals/all great individuals on the planet's) don't differentiate between the presence of various violences. As expressed by Nordstrom, a great many people will normally tell/demonstrate the contrast between various wars; nonetheless, not very many tell/demonstrate the distinction between the experience of brutality all through such wars (57).…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War isn’t peace, it’s scary and not a very peaceful time. We also know that it is somewhat helpful in stimulating the economy. The reason people in 1984 believe Newspeak is because they're being manipulated,brainwashed,and tricked into being what the government would like them to be.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” criticizes our societies by comparing it to the citizens of Omelas whom lack aggression, embrace joy, and reject supreme control or prejudice. Unlike our societies, the people of Omelas avoid conflict and war. They were friendly and peaceful since, “They did not use swords… They were not barbarians.” Laws were not plentiful and police were not necessary due to this. The author portrays these traits as unusual which indirectly criticizes us. The author understands how countries and cities around the world are not as safe and peaceful compared to the Omelas. We are getting criticized since we do not learn from war and we cling onto our weapons. Our solutions are rarely solved through a compromise which usually leads to aggression and…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict is inevitable, and constantly present in life. Whether it’s obvious and right in front of your face or hidden beneath a pile of lies someone will always suffer because of it. Although that being said, without it- would we truly understand the importance of peace? There are some out there who believe that some of the greatest triumphs and acts of the human spirit were during times of great conflict such as wars and repression’s. But I believe that these events have caused the most horrific demonstrations of human nature in the act of killing the innocent.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 2012, it was estimated that more than 172 million people were affected by conflict worldwide. The effect of so many people being affected by conflicts is a way to respond to them. With all the conflicts in the world, people need to be able to respond and react to these conflicts in the best possible way. People can best respond to conflict by believing in what they think is right and persevering through everything against them, so they can show what is morally right, let nothing hold them back, and help others with the same issue along the way. During times of conflict, it is important for people to choose a side they believe in, so they can show what they think is right.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Chenoweth suggests that states, nationalist movements and ethnic groups that engage in conflict with each other are faced with two options—violence and non-violence. She says that although major wars between states have become less common, today’s politics are filled with internal conflict, ethnic cleansing and violence against civilians. She asks the question as to why violent strategies are used instead of non-violent ones like protests and negotiation, even though they come at such a great cost.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Myers states “Recall that conflict is a perceived incompatibility of actions or goals. Many conflicts contain but a small core of truly incompatible goals; the bigger problem is the misperceptions of the other’s motives and goals”. When we deal with conflict resolution and peacemaking, we have to keep in mind that each party has to keep an open mind and also be open to…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As humans, conflict pervades every aspect of our lives; it is inevitable. Whether it’s between good and evil, strength and weakness or love and hate, can only define our true natures. It is the test of inner conflict that can ultimately reveal our noble qualities or magnify or vindictive characters. As Mahatma Gandhi once said “an eye for an eye can only make the whole world blind”…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Muddle Society

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For example, Israel and Palestine war, two individual, Israel and Palestine have conflict and they have acted to serve their own interest. In the system, every human has potential to shape his or her kind of a utopian version of the world, as he or she wants it to be. Every human can be counted as one individual because they have impact on the system. For example, Aung San Su Kyi can be counted as an individual with tendency who is civilizing the world. Her actions and ideology has changed some people’s lives, which has shaped the trend of the world in general and Burma in specific. Every individual pursues their own interests in order to stabilize their status. According to the trend, there is no sense of justice or fairness. So, the strong one is more likely to be the winner compared to the weak one. The nature of the Muddle society is a lot similar to Hobbes’s human nature. Individuals are egoistic and they only seek for their own selfness. The strong one is not necessarily the best one because the weak one also has the potential to harm. For example, Osama bin Laden’s attack of the World Trade Center and Pentagon shows that the weak one has the ability to harm the strong one. The shape of the world totally depends on how individual react to each other: in a peaceful way or in a violent way. The current world situation is the game in which people try to…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conflict Theory

    • 9877 Words
    • 40 Pages

    This essay covers three broad topics. First, there has been renewed debate about human nature and the roots of intergroup violence and warfare in evolutionary biology, in psychology, and in anthropology. The “ordinary man” hypothesis explains why and how humans justify and participate in violence and atrocities. Second, in addition to interstate wars, political scientists have been studying insurgencies, ethnic cleansing, civil wars, genocide, ethnic riots, and other modes of violence called “new wars.” Based on hundreds of case studies, comparative research and large quantitative data sets, they have theorized about the root causes and dynamics of these conflicts, and about prevention, deterrence, conflict management, and peace making. Third, the social movement and collective action field in sociology developed a mobilization theory for explaining why and how relatively powerless groups confront regimes, how the dynamics of confrontations escalate to civil strife, what outcomes result, and whether violence was necessary for change. All three research traditions contribute insights and findings for conflict theory. In the conclusion, I argue that a theory of conflict should integrate group with state/regime centered analysis (micro with the macro), give more weight to dynamics than to root causes, and make conflict management an equal partner with violent conflict.…

    • 9877 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world is full of conflict and that is why there is always a war in the history. Every human being views the world in a unique fashion. “No two persons regard the world in exactly the same way…” was once said by J.W. von Goethe. Our decisions and interpretations to conflicts are all get based on our own particular experiences, perspectives, personality and cultural backgrounds. People have different motivations, beliefs, values and goals. Although we often share similar experience, we look at the situations differently. No two people think the same or see the world through the same eyes no matter how much you have in common. Everyone thinks that they are the ones who are right and people go to great lengths to not be wrong so that they see themselves as correct…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays