Preview

The Norman Conquest

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1526 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Norman Conquest
Makayla Lemelin
Honors English IV
Dale
14 March 2013

The Norman Conquest
The Norman conquest of England was a military invasion of England by William the Conqueror in 1066. King Harold, with his Saxon army, and Duke William fought at the Battle of Hastings on October 14, 1066. King Harold was killed in the battle and his army left. On December 25 1066 William was crowned the new King of England. On December 25 1066 William was crowned the new King of England( The History of the Norman Conquest). William was a Duke who ruled Normandy, now a region in France. He invaded England after the death of King Edward the Confessor because he believed he had the most right to be King of England. Due to the invasion of England, The Norman Conquest was a pivotal event in English history. It largely removed the native ruling class, replacing it with a foreign, French-speaking monarchy, aristocracy, and clerical hierarchy. This, in turn, brought about a transformation of the English language and the culture of England in a new era often referred to as Norman England(The History of the Norman Conquest).
William decided to invade England and enforce his claim by his and only his direct orders. After gathering an army of some valiant sized men, he landed at Penvensey, England in September of 1066. The rebut over the conquest started almost as soon as the event itself. Ironically, William the conqueror was also the Duke of Normandy in France. So this put William in an awkward position of ruling one country while still serving as a vassal of another country ruler. By bringing England under the control of rulers originating in France, the Norman conquest linked the country more closely with continental Europe, lessened Scandinavian influence, and also set the stage for a rivalry with France that would continue intermittently for many centuries. It also had important consequences for the rest of the British Isles, paving the way for further Norman conquests in Wales and Ireland,



Cited: Dennis, Chris. "The strange death of King Harold II: Propaganda and the problem of legitimacy in the aftermath of the Battle of Hastings." Historian 101(2009):14. eLibrary. Web. 13 Feb. 2013. "The History of the Norman Conquest." Essential Norman Conquest. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Feb. 2013. The Norman Conquest." The Norman Conquest. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Feb. 2013. "Norman Conquest." Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica Online School Edition. Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 2013. Web. 13 Feb. 2013.<http://www.school.eb.com/eb/article-258596>. "Norman Conquest." Compton 's by Britannica, v 6.0. 2009. eLibrary. Web. 13 Feb. 2013. "United Kingdom." Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica Online School Edition. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 2013. Web. 13 Feb. 2013.<http://www.school.eb.com/eb/article-44765>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When the two armies finally met at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold proves to be victorious. This was thought to be a huge victory and a defining moment for England until Harold discovers some interesting news. As Harold and his men were just enjoying a huge victory in battle, they learn of Duke William and his army coming in on the southern coast of England. This was important because right after a critical battle in the northern part of England, Harold must now navigate his troops back down to the southern coast in a desperate attempt to defend…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It was an honor to fight for Duke William's right to be crowned King in the battle of Hastings on the 14th of October 1066. The battle of Hastings was one of the most memorable and successful battles that I have ever participated in as a Norman soldier. The Duke of Normandy, William, prepared for the battle against the King of England, Harold, months in advance. It all started after the death of King Edward, the Confessor died the 5th of January 1066 without an official heir to the throne (BBC, 2011). The day after King Edwards death, Harold claimed the throne to be King Harold II of England, illegally. Once Duke William heard of this news, he set out to gather his army and seek the approval of the Pope to become England's next rightful King.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Normans were French-speaking, and as a result of their rule, they introduced many French words that started in the nobility and eventually became part of the English language itself. As Paul K. Davis writes, "William's victory placed a foreign ruler on the throne of England, introducing European rather than Scandinavian society onto the isolated island" in "the last successful invasion of England." Paul K. Davis, 100 Decisive Battles from Ancient Times to the Present: The World's Major Battles and How They Shaped History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 113.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    William’s archers went first their aim was not great as they were shooting uphill consequently hitting the shield wall and soaring over their heads. Next William sent in his cavalry (men on horses) to attack but because there was a shield wall the hoses could not get past therefore the Normans were safe.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first argument as to why William won the battle of Hastings, is that he had the bet army. The Normans had 7500 men, all fully trained compared to the 4500 village workers and only 500 professionally trained soldiers that made up Harold’s army. Also, William had many archers that could kill from 100 meters way. The Normans were also equipped with blacksmiths, carpenters, medics and cooks as well as a few mercenaries, who were professional soldiers that fought for whoever paid them the most amount of money, on his side. Williams’s men also had better weapons and armour, for example: the cavalry were all equipped with mail hauberk, there is some evidence some of the archers used crossbows in addition to bows and arrows, some battle maces were also used along with spears and swords, round and kite shaped shields mean that the Normans were more protected from the English. Another benefit that William had was his great leadership skills.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William was a good king and had a numerous amount of strengths. Throughout the Battle of Hastings, William had used clever tactics. Due to his smart tactics, archers were lined at the front to try and soften up the English's shield wall, when the Normans didn't make a difference to the wall William changed his tactics and cleverly tricked Harold by double backing on themselves and breaking the English's strong…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Duke of Normandy was born around 1028. He was the victor at the battle of Hastings and was known to be William the Bastard and William the conqueror by his enemies. William became the king of England in 1066, December 25. When he was about 9 years of age, he inherited power on his father’s death and faced many challenges. He ruled England until his death, which was in 1087.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A week after the battle William felt no shame, he went off to London without any remorse. He was now called "William the conqueror" and soon to be "William king of England". William the conqueror decided to build and Abby as penance for the bloodshed and suffering of the battle. The altar was also said to have been built on the spot where herald fell at his death.Thanks to William I, The future belonged to the Normans.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reasons for Norman victory were many and varied; however many elements were that William’s skill and training as a leader made him deadly and the precision of his battle plans made him an excellent commander. Luck also made it possible for William’s victory and the fact that Harold’s mistakes were forced on him by luck made it possible. Although Harold was a talented opponent, luck was not on Harold’s side therefore making it unlikely he would…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William spent most of 1067 in Normandy, returning to England in December to continue the sublimation of his kingdom. He besieged Exeter, joined Gloucester and Bristol. In 1068 he secured Warwick, Nottingham, and York, when he swerved south to occupy Lincoln, Huntingdon, and Cambridge. When Danish raiders and hostile Yorkshiremen tried to destroy the Norman Establishment north of the Humber in 1069, his’’ Harrying of the North” was swift and terrible.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For William the Conqueror, success was a way of life. During his reign as king of England, William conquered three locations. The first was in Pevensey in the South of England, after, he went toward Hastings and Fought at Senlac Hill, lastly he took England. William the Conqueror was one of the most influential men in history.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest is not a bad book, but it is not a very good book either. When I first opened the book I was expecting to have nothing cold hard facts thrown into my face, but instead I got an informational story that was told with emotion. There were times in the book where my gears actually started to turn and then there were times when I struggled to make it through the chapter because I lost interest in that piece of the text. The information in the book is boring but the way that Howarth told the structure of events is what actually kept me interested in the story.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although William the Conqueror had defeated Harold at the Battle of Hastings in 1066, an even bigger challenge had presented itself. William was now outnumbered in a land he had very little knowledge of, and would face several rebellions in the first decade of his reign. William was aware of this challenge, building castles in towns which presented any threat as a symbol of his power. Despite these measures, it would take William almost a decade, until 1075 to gain full control of England, which he did so due to several different factors, including his new motte and bailey castles, the weakness of English rebels and his own leadership in the face of rebellion. Upon landing in England, one of William’s first actions was to set up a readymade motte and bailey castle at Hastings.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1066 - William of Normandy, a French Duke, conquers England in the Battle of Hastings. He became King of England and changed the country forever.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays