Preview

The Nuremberg Trials: Was It Fair?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
273 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Nuremberg Trials: Was It Fair?
Another reason that the court itself was not fair was that the four Allied Powers and their judge representatives came into the trials with strong anti-German approaches and they did not judge the Germans objectively and Fairley. Both the Soviet Union, France, The United States and Britain blamed Germany for its horrible acts during World War II and they put that blame on the individual defendants instead of Germany as a whole. The Soviet Union blamed the defendants for murdering many people and for turning their land into desert. In 1943, the Soviet leader Josef Stalin said to Prime Minister Winston Churchill and President Franklin D. Roosevelt that 50,000-10,000 German commanders should be murdered (Scheffer). The French blamed the defendants for systematically plundering their country and for murdering and torturing tens of thousands of French people in the Gestapo jails and in concentration camps. …show more content…
Roosevelt, agreed to the plan of summary execution of 2,500 Nazis in 1944. Secretary of War Henry Stimson was the one who advocated for a fair trial with basic rights for the defendants which was eventually the system that was used in the Nuremberg Trials. The British wanted 50-100 top Nazi leaders executed and according to Prime Minister Winston Churchill, these Nazis should be executed within six hours of capture (Scheffer). The judges in the Nuremberg Trials represented these 4 nations and their views towards the prosecution of German war criminals. This was not fair for the Germans because the judges of the trial were biased and did not judge each defendant for himself but as a citizen of Nazi

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the attempt had failed, “Hitler told German radio listeners a coup by a ‘clique of ambitious, conscienceless, and criminal and stupid officers’ had failed and would be dealt with in true National Socialist fashion” (McDonough). Five thousand people who were against Hitler were executed that day (McDonough). “In an attempt to protect himself, Fromm organized the execution of Stauffenberg along with three other conspirators in the courtyard of the War Ministry” (“Claus von…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This punishment should be so strong that the perpetuator should never even have the temptation to be aggressive or hurtful again. France had demanded that Germany pay upwards of 33 billion dollars in reparations. The main issue it appears between the Allied powers is that they differ in the quantitative and severity aspect of justice. Wilson clearly wants “justice”, meaning everyone involved in the war will get what they justly deserve; it is the “justly deserve” aspect that Ponicaré is undoubtedly arguing against, for what constitutes a just reparation varies per…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Reason for trials: seen as important to make the Germans realise the scale of destruction that had occurred, the atrocities committed by the Germans were part of official government policy, the idea that if it was shown that this behaviour would not go unpunished then such evil would not be repeated and the hope that International Justice would be a good sign for the future of the United…

    • 3933 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Don’t forget that I have three million men, with every key position in the hands of my own people... If Hitler is reasonable I shall settle the matter quietly; if he isn’t I must be prepared to use force - not for my sake but for the sake of our revolution.” “ Hitler had killed many people before, but this is madness. He got his power until he died. He killed many of his SA leaders because he thought they had too much power” (Holocaust Encyclopedia, unknown). By the end of the night he had killed over a hundred people including SA leaders, officers, and Ernst Rohm who was his biggest threat.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why Hitler killed people was because they were different than him. The Germans killed them by, Genocide, Ethnic cleansing, Deportation, and Mass murder. Some of them were taken to maximum security prisons and tortured. Do you want to know the other side of the story?…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Holocaust was a time of suffering form many Jewish people. Many had contributed to making all the Jewish people suffer, but one person who should have been responsible was Franz Stangl. Franz Stangl was a cruel Nazi war criminal who had also been a commander of several extermination camps during the holocaust era. Franz Stangl not only worked for the extermination camps but had also run some camps killing over 900,000 Jewish people. He had thought that the humans were cargo and garbage. Not only did he thought that the Jewish people worthless humans, but he took so many lives away from so many people. Franz Stangl had done some vicious crimes and should have been punished greatly for his actions on account of many reasons.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler’s loyal court members swore to oath to Hitler, this meant that court trails were normally never fair or just. Hitler’s judges were made to be loyal to Hitler; meaning that if you went to court for being anti-Nazi you would most likely never win. This helped Hitler to keep out anti-Nazi people to help keep rumours, kept at a minimum so people could always see only the good side of the Nazi party. If found guilty you were lucky to be alive let alone see your town or city ever again.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, the Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials prosecuting and questioning Nazi war criminals. When Hitler came to power, he created laws persecuting Jews and other enemies of Nazi. These laws provoked the death of 6 million European Jews. In response, the allied leaders of Great Britain, the U.S., and the Soviet Union “issued the first joint declaration officially noting the mass murder of European Jewry and resolving to prosecute those responsible for violence against civilian populations,” (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuremburg Trials

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The IMT was created to be a trial of judgment for war crimes in an effort to serve justice to those who fell victim to Nazi terrorism. The IMT, which consisted of judges and prosecutors from the four victorious powers following WWII, Great Britain, the United States, France and the Soviet Union, formally indicted the Nuremberg defendants on four counts: crimes against peace, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and conspiracy to commit these crimes. Twenty-one defendants were examined at the International Military Tribunal between November 20, 1945 and October 15-16, 1946. There were 24 men indicted however two of them never stood trial. Robert Ley, the head of the Nazi labor movement, committed suicide before the trial began, and Gustav Krupp, was ruled as too ill to be tried. Hitler as well as many other top Nazi leaders such as Goebbels killed themselves in the final days of the war. On the day of the trial 21 out of the 22 accused men were present of which include Martin Bormann: Secretary to Hitler, Head of the Nazi Party Chancellery, Karl Doenitz: Commander-in-Chief of the German Navy, Hans Frank: Governor-General of occupied Poland, Wilhelm Frick: Minister of the Interior, Hans Fritzsche: Head of the Wireless News Service (radio produced by the Reich), Walther Funk: Minister of Economics, Hermann…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Who should be put to trial, the individuals who gave the orders? The people who carried out the orders? Those who allowed it to happen? Those who gave the orders are the one who should be put on trial. Those orders that were responsible for the deaths of 6 million Jews. You can't blame the soldiers nor people who carried out the orders. It's not their fault they have to listen to their higher ups, especially back in World War 2 where you would probably be getting killed for not following orders. According to handout #65 Rudolph Hess, the commander of the largest camp says “ I was ordered to establish extermination facilities at Auschwitz in 6/1941” Rudolph was ordered to make the facilities. These orders are what caused the Holocaust. It's…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    German citizens were not responsible for the Holocaust because many of them didn’t agree with the Nazi’s ideology and helped Jewish people by resisting and going against Nazi’s ideas. One way that German citizens were not responsible for the holocaust can be seen on Document #4. The author, Walter Meyer, was a German who was apart of a gang called the Noble White Pirates growing up in the Holocaust that resisted Nazi organizations, like the Nazi Youth. This document was for the citizens of the U.S. to tell them his point of view during of what happened in the holocaust. The author helped his Jewish friend by hiding him in his house. Being apart of the Noble White Pirates made him enemies with the Nazi youth. They planned many ways to steal…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jewish people were not the only ones receiving this torture thought. Many other groups such as Gypsies, handicaps, homosexuals, and others were also being attacked. German scientist, businesspeople, industrialists and civil servants contributed to the killing efforts of these groups of human beings. Many people and organizations are responsible for the Holocaust, but the actions of Hitler and his Nazis…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were two main political philosophers during the seventeenth century. Hobbes is largely known for his writing of the “Leviathan”, and Locke for authoring "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding." Included in their essays, both men discuss the purpose and structure of government, natural law, and the characteristics of man in and out of the state of nature. The two men's opinion of man vary widely. Hobbes sees man as being evil, whereas Locke views man in a much more optimistic light. While in the state of nature and under natural law, they both agree that man is equal. However, their ideas of natural law differ greatly. Hobbes positions himself with the view that the state of nature is a state of war where every man is for himself and loyalty to another being will only bring dismay. Contrastingly, Locke sees natural law and the state of nature as a place of equality and freedom for all. Locke therefore believes that government is necessary in order to preserve natural law, and on the contrary, Hobbes sees government as necessary in order to control natural law.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice In The Holocaust

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By the end of World War II, about two-thirds of the Jewish population were killed. Countless people lost their family and their friends. When the survivors were released from the concentration camps, numerous individuals had nowhere to go, and no place to call home. The Allied forces tried a multitude of Nazi War criminals in the Nuremberg Trials hoping that the imprisonment or killing of these flawed, yet guilty German officials would bring justice to those who survived the Holocaust. But was justice truly ever achieved?…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dictator in charge of this gruesome slaying was Adolf Hitler. He believed that Germans were superior to all others and he persuaded all of Germany that any other races below them were less…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays