The Old Brother David Brooks Analysis

The parable of the prodigal sons offers a probing moral. Some argue that “those who play by the rules should see the reward” (Brooks), however Brooks argues that this is inapplicable to the current society. Instead, Brooks claims that America should adopt the father’s policy. The older brother’s approach deters a potential “rebound”, rather than instating acceptance and reform. First, the older brother’s rational must be analyzed. His approach altogether rejects reform through a condemning tone. The younger brother is already aware of his superficial actions, and therefore doesn't need further chastisement. Brooks continues to outline the position of the older brother. What was he truly working for? According to Brooks “he was working for
material reward”, which the older brother will still have. The only person at a loss is the younger brother, who now doesn't have what the older brother has worked for. That is punishment in itself. Ultimately he would abandon his family again; searching to “reassert his dignity” (Brooks). On the other side is the father’s approach, which relies on acceptance. By welcoming in the son, the father showed his support no matter what. Everyone wants and sometimes needs a second. Considering, in jewish life, a feast means membership all is forgiven when the father gathers a feast in celebration of his newly found son. Despite the younger brother’s actions, the father can join his son and reembark on their lives together. The last step, where the lesson is truly learned, is to reform. This reformation reinstalls the younger son’s part in society. Although the forgiveness granted by the father was mature, the moral isn't learned unless the younger brother strives to change. However, there is a greater chance for younger son to succeed if he is in a supportive environment. Although the older brother’s stand is plausible, the father’s approach is more applicable. As said by Brooks, acceptance and reformation is the