Preview

The Participative Style of Leadership

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1728 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Participative Style of Leadership
LEADERSHIP TASK 1
A1. LEADERSHIP STYLE

LEADERSHIP - SAT TASK 1
A1. LEADERSHIP STYLE
Leadership is the ability to organize a group of people in order to achieve a common goal. My leadership style is participative leadership and it is to share decision making with each member of my group. A Participative style of leadership encompasses consultative, consensus, and democratic. As a participative leader who is consultative, it is very important that I confer with members of the group before making final decisions on issues concerning the group. In addition, as a consensus leader, it is important to build consensus among the group in order to encourage group discussions concerning an issue and finally make decisions that fully reflect the agreement and support from the members of the group. Consensus leader ensures that all members of the group are involved to support a decision before it is considered final. Also, a participant leader is a democratic leader who ensures that final authority in decision making lies on the group. In this case, the group deliberate on issues and collect group opinion, and then cast votes in order to determine the final decision to make. DuBrin, A. (2010). Leadership.
The advantages of the Participative style of leadership are that it operates on bases of management openness, which allow leaders to accept suggestions from group members to manage the operations. The participative style also allow welcoming ideas from workers since the workers are closer to the market and know how the products are doing or used and are able to determine the immediate problems to be solved. Also, this leadership style enhances team work approach which helps to develop marketing strategy and retaining employees. The participant style of leadership is also well comfortable to people who want to get involved in decision making and to bring their findings back to management.
The disadvantages of the participative style of leadership are that too much time



References: Curt, Sprouse. (2013). Leadership Styles. Retrieved from http://www.hr.com/en/app/blog/2013/04/different-leadership-styles-and-their-advantages-a_hfcoua95.html DuBrin, A. (2010). Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills (6th ed.). Mason, OH: South Western. Mind Tools. (2013). Choosing the Right Style. Retrieved from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_84.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Participative theory says the ideal leadership style takes the input of others into account. This theory suggests that leaders encourage group member to participate and contribute in decision making for the organization. This makes member feel important and devoted to the task but the leader holds the right to allow the feedback of others (Yuki,…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Showing which geographic region of the world your specific organization, division or department operates in: review the impact that the leadership and management style has on the organization, is it authoritarian or participative?…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 27 M1

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a Participative leader I accept input from one or more of my team when making decisions and solving problems, but as the leader I retain the final say when choices are made. Team members tend to be encouraged and motivated by this style of leadership. This style of leadership often leads to more effective and accurate decisions, since I am not an expert in all areas. Input from team members with specialized knowledge and expertise creates a more complete basis for decision-making.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To begin with, Robbins & Judge (2011) define leadership as the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals. Furthermore, leaders can emerge from within a group as well as by formal appointment. Also, Fiedler believes a key factor in leadership success is the individual’s basic leadership style (Robbins & Judge, 2011). Leadership style is the manner and approach providing direction, implementing plans, and motivating people (Businessholic, 2014). Walt Disney Company’s management exercises participative leadership. “The participative leader consists of one or more of their workers within the choice creating process. Nevertheless, the leader holds the power to create the final choice. Occasionally, this leadership style can be noticed as a sign or weakness; nevertheless it is completely the opposite” (Businessholic, 2014). This style of…

    • 1513 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In conclusion, leadership of a team can be the difference between success and failure. Leadership is the process of determining goals for the team and finding a way for the team to meet those goals. Leadership involves finding ways to motivate team members or employees to reach their goals. Leadership can be passive or aggressive and should never involve disrespecting anyone. Showing good leadership involves reading people you are leading and finding what works with them. Leadership should involve gaining confidence of your employees and teammates. If your employees respect you they will be more likely to follow your directions.…

    • 2116 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership can be defined as process in which an individual influences a group of people to accomplish a common goal. The goal is achieved by cohesive behavior and mutual cooperation. A leader directs his or her followers to reach a specific goal and infuses sense of positivity in them (Meenakshi, n.d.).…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the leadership quiz I am a participative leader, which is the type of leadership that that takes into account the input of other group members, but the leader at the end still have the final decision (Lewin, n.d.). Participative leadership is a method of guiding people based on democratic values of inclusion (Spross & Hanson, 2009). It is focus in the group member input, team concepts and shared decision-making. In order to be successful with this type of leadership style, the leader should have certain qualities as be…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The project aims to investigate the effectiveness of interprofessional teams in improving the quality and safety of healthcare. Interprofessional teams are inevitable in today’s healthcare. Interprofessional teams are faced with various challenges. Leadership incapability’s was identified as the major hindrance to their effectiveness. The concept of ambiguity is a critical contributor to leadership failures and role confusion in interprofessional teams.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    sat 2 Essay Example

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After taking the above assessments, I was able to determine that my personal leadership style is Participative. A Participative leader is “a person in charge who shares decision making with group members” (DuBrin, A. (2010). Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills (6th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning. ISBN-13: 9780547143965).…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Participative leadership is working within the group or working together as a team. Consulting and working within the group to obtain a consensus for a successful outcome and by accepting suggestions from the group, the group has a better idea of what the outcome of the final project will be. According to research, “Poor performing teams are often dominated by the team leader, whereas high-performing teams are characterized by shared…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership is described as a person that influences a group of people towards the success of a goal (Wong, 2007). Source (2015) describes leadership as a process of influence which can enlist the aid and support of others to accomplish a task. Cherry (2006), advocates that leadership styles describe characteristic behaviors, motivation, and managing a group of people. The following are three of the most prominent leadership styles used today: Authoritarian (Autocratic) provides clear expectations; Participative (Democratic) offers guidance to group members; and Delegative (Laissez-Faire) unable to work independently.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership styles differ from person to person and most are based on personal experiences. While some may be brought up to be directive others are taught to be cooperative and helpful. According to renowned psychologist Kurt Lewin, there are three main leadership styles, Autocratic, Democratic and Laissez-faire. All of which have their place in developing a strong functional unit. Upon taking the “leadership style quiz”, this author discovered his tendencies for his leadership style is that of a participative leader. A participative (also known as a democratic leader) is someone who is able to accept input by opinions and recommendations…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Self Assessments

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These thoughts make me relate to the situational theory to lead and manage a group, however my style of leadership fits into the participative leadership, where managers will use more group supervision rather than individual supervision. This style suggests that team meetings are there to help facilitate everyone 's cooperation, and the manager 's role is to provide guidance and support toward problem solving. However, use of participation does not imply abdication of responsibilities, and the manager will still be responsible for all decisions and its consecutive…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cutajar, M. (2012). Pros and cons of team leadership style. Retrieved November, 26 2012, from…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics