The Pascal's Wager Analysis

Section III of the Pensees is widely recognized as the Pascal's Wager. In this section, Pascal makes perhaps one of the most convincing argument in the history of philosophy. The French philosopher, physicist, and mathematician posited that human beings commonly bet with their lives on whether God exists or not. In paragraph 234, the philosopher notably affirms that if humans must act solely on the merit of some measure of surety or certainty, then they ought not to count on religion because it is not certain. Nonetheless, Pascal points out that human beings have been taking part in a lot of other uncertain activities such as sea voyages and battles, and thus religion should not be bargained. With that in mind, it appears that almost everything in human life is uncertain, but Pascal affirms that religion inherently has more certainty, as compared to a prediction of whether one might see tomorrow or not. The author takes into assumption that no one can thoroughly explicate religion, and consequently, it is not utterly sure whether it exists or not. He does argue, that seeking to prove that religion does not exist is undoubtedly a very daunting
The philosopher presents individuals with binary choice, but there could be many interpretations of the universe about religion. By blindly conforming to the Pascal wager, one could end up worshipping the wrong god without knowing making a choice even more difficult. The freedom for individuals to make decisions on their own is proving to enable humans to be willing to lead moral lives entirely without having to conform to social norms or those of organized religious factions. More so, the Pascal Wager and assumptions laid in paragraph 234 are becoming less popular as people are discovering the infinite number of Gods around the universe making a choice even more