Basinger's Argument Of Religious Exclusivism?
Basinger’s Argument
According to Williams, 2013, religious exclusivism refers to the view that individual’s religious belief is the only appropriate and correct view, where all others are seen as false and wrong. That is, a notion that only one primary theistic system contains the truth, while others are wrong, mistaken, or far away from the truth. Apparently, this sort of thinking connects with religious extremists and fundamentals. One of the philosophers by the name Basinger argues for a middle way stand regarding the religious exclusivism theory, where he maintains that religious exclusivism is a justified and reliable position to stand with only if the quest for truth is acknowledged as the primary epistemic duty.
In his argument, Basinger formulates this epistemic duty with a notion that if a religious exclusivist desires to maximize the truth, avoid or minimize errors, he/she must be under a prima facie obligation to try and resolve any substantial epistemic peer conflict (Williams, 2013). In supporting his stand, Basinger argues that religious exclusivism becomes more practical when individuals consider intra-theistic systems. In his explanation, he gives an example of a disagreement between the Christians on the nature of God’s omnipotence and the nature of the human being freedom that poses a substantial difference with …show more content…
Reason being, we are all from diverse cultures, with different beliefs, which means, we have differences in religion. However, these differences should not make any group of people view their faith as the best, the one that holds the truth, creating a perception that other people’s beliefs are false and wrong. We all serve one supreme being, our cultural differences are minor, as we all have the same hope and faith of having an eternal life. Therefore, there should not have even a single attempt or assessment to solve any thriving religious
According to Williams, 2013, religious exclusivism refers to the view that individual’s religious belief is the only appropriate and correct view, where all others are seen as false and wrong. That is, a notion that only one primary theistic system contains the truth, while others are wrong, mistaken, or far away from the truth. Apparently, this sort of thinking connects with religious extremists and fundamentals. One of the philosophers by the name Basinger argues for a middle way stand regarding the religious exclusivism theory, where he maintains that religious exclusivism is a justified and reliable position to stand with only if the quest for truth is acknowledged as the primary epistemic duty.
In his argument, Basinger formulates this epistemic duty with a notion that if a religious exclusivist desires to maximize the truth, avoid or minimize errors, he/she must be under a prima facie obligation to try and resolve any substantial epistemic peer conflict (Williams, 2013). In supporting his stand, Basinger argues that religious exclusivism becomes more practical when individuals consider intra-theistic systems. In his explanation, he gives an example of a disagreement between the Christians on the nature of God’s omnipotence and the nature of the human being freedom that poses a substantial difference with …show more content…
Reason being, we are all from diverse cultures, with different beliefs, which means, we have differences in religion. However, these differences should not make any group of people view their faith as the best, the one that holds the truth, creating a perception that other people’s beliefs are false and wrong. We all serve one supreme being, our cultural differences are minor, as we all have the same hope and faith of having an eternal life. Therefore, there should not have even a single attempt or assessment to solve any thriving religious