Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Power Struggle

Good Essays
1197 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Power Struggle
Charlotte Lewis

Task:

Research the factors that led to Stalin’s victory in the power struggle for leadership of the USSR after Lenin’s death:
a. Alliances
b. Use of Lenin’s work
c. Stalin’s position in the party
Explain which one you think is the most significant factor.

Alliances

Alliances performed an extremely important role in the leadership struggle. First, the alliances allowed Stalin to stay in the background while the other contenders fought each other in public. In 1924, it was Zinoviev and Kamenev who openly battled with Trotsky, while in 1927, it was Bukharin who spoke out against the United Opposition. In this way, Stalin avoided himself from unimportant quarreling and increased the respect of the party. Secondly, the alliances allowed Stalin to deal with his opponents in turn: in 1924, the Triumvirate was able to defeat Trotsky; in 1927, The Duumvirate dealt with Zinoviev and Kamenev. Finally, Stalin’s alliances allowed him to maintain a majority support in the Politburo and because of this, Stalin was always part of the government and never associated with an opposition group.

Use of Lenin’s Work

Stalin’s command would prove one of the goriest recorded in history. Famine and fear killed millions of people; in addition, millions more found themselves committed to imprisonment in the horrifying Siberian gulags (the punishing system of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics consisting of a network of labor camps). Subsequently, when the Soviet Union revealed crimes made by Stalin in the 1950s, the officials claimed that he had corrupted Leninism; he had betrayed Lenin’s initial vision of a communist utopia. However, these declarations contained little truth: while Lenin disregarded Stalin at the end of his life, Stalin endured a fairly faithful disciple of the Soviet Union’s founder. The terrors, assassinations and deprivations of the 1930s were purely served to build on and intensify what Lenin had initiated during the Revolution. Lenin and Stalin brutally discharged the peasantry; both confined their political enemies in deliberation camps and both created large- scale famines. Lenin had organized an obscure and bloody path to Stalin's succeeding terrors.

After Lenin’s death, the Soviet Union held up Lenin’s writings as works of logical prodigy, however this glorification comprised nothing more than empty publicity, all down to the fact that Lenin wasn’t a great intellectual. Although, more than anyone else, Lenin laid the foundations for a state so rough that it would withstand for seventy years and be so powerful that it would ultimately challenge the United States for world supremacy. It is this achievement that protected Lenin’s place among the most significant figures of the century. But significance isn’t the same as greatness. Lenin possessed, and acted upon, a great vision:
He was an optimist; he seemed, more than Stalin, to have truthfully believed in the requirement of the Revolution to purify Russia of the evils of Tsardom and draining poverty.

Like his brother Alexander, whose death set him on the road to discrimination, he noticed that his country, and the world as a whole, contained clear flaws and injustices. However, when it came to actually alleviating these flaws and building his own utopia, Lenin keenly turned to murder, terror, and brutal domination. Having forsaken religion as a young man, he quickly renounced all philosophies of decency as well, calling it "bourgeois"; from his point of view, and from that of all the Bolsheviks, the ends justified the means. They were convinced that when Marx's "scientific" estimates of revolution came true, their bloody actions would find vindication. But history has not been so kind–to the Bolsheviks or their victims.

Stalin’s Position in the Party

When Lenin died in 1924, everybody was convinced that the adept leader of the Red Army, Trotsky, would become leader. This was thought acknowledging the contents of Lenin’s testament and what was said about Stalin. Below are two separate paragraphs that I’ve chosen as my evidence to prove my point:

“Comrade Stalin, having become Secretary-General, has unlimited authority concentrated in his hands, and I am not sure whether he will always be capable of using that authority with sufficient caution.”

“Stalin is too coarse and this defect, although quite tolerable in our midst and in dealing among us Communists, becomes intolerable in a Secretary-General. That is why I suggest that the comrades think about a way of removing Stalin from that post and appointing another man in his stead who in all other respects differs from Comrade Stalin in having only one advantage, namely, that of being more tolerant, more loyal, more polite and more considerate to the comrades, less capricious, etc.”

From these two sources, it is easy to understand that Lenin didn’t have a positive opinion about Stalin and wanted to encourage the other members to vote him out. However, in the end, Stalin took power with the aid of his position within the party. He had several positions including being the General Secretary of the party, Head of Central Control Commission and Head of the Workers’ and Peasants’ inspectorate. These positions intended to limit his power acknowledging the fact that it was only a party position and not a government position. Nevertheless, Stalin realized that it gave him the authority to attain information on party members, promote and demote people and to expel those who opposed the party, or appeared to oppose him. Those he promoted were those who were loyal to him, and those he demoted were those who were loyal to Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and his other rivals. This helped to increase his popularity in the party because he won the hearts of those who originally liked him and so this allowed him to have a stronger chance of getting the power he desired. Russia was not a democracy so popularity amongst the people was irrelevant.

Stalin’s intelligence gathering, initially logging party members’ associates and their attitudes on different political issues, grew into active intelligence gathering – Phone taps, apartments bugged, etc. The fear of Stalin grew in proportion to his power, so people were reluctant to speak about anything that may get back to the Vozhd. Politburo colleagues knew Vozhd as the boss.

After growing up in Georgia, Stalin conducted activities for the Bolshevik (Communist) party for twelve years before the Russian Revolution of 1917. After participating, Stalin took military leadership positions in the Russian Civil War and Soviet-Polish War. Stalin was one of the Bolsheviks' chief technicians in the Caucasus and grew very close to Lenin, who saw him as a capable and loyal follower. Stalin played a decisive role in engineering the 1921 Red Army invasion of Georgia, embracing a particularly hardline approach to opposition. His connections helped him attain high positions in the new Soviet government, eventually becoming General Secretary in 1922. Lenin grew critical of Stalin, and many other Bolsheviks at this time, but in 1922 a stroke forced Lenin into semi-retirement. After Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin overpowered documentation of Lenin's recommendation. Thereafter, Stalin politically isolated his major enemies, such as archrival Trotsky, and had them dismissed from government altogether. This eventually led him to be the sole uncontested leader of the Party and the Soviet Union.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The most important individual in bringing about the change in influence is Vladimir Lenin, who brought about a sudden sharp rise in the party’s popularity. Following the 1917 October Revolution, Lenin became the leader of the Communist Party and greatly increased the party’s political influence with his ‘one party state’. Lenin’s creation of the Politburo in 1919, which was a group of eight high profile party members who influenced any decision being made, demonstrates the party’s increased political influence by showing their domination of governmental bodies. Public support of the party is obvious in the increase of RCP membership, March 1919 to March 1920, from 250,000 to 612,000. This may have been due mainly to Lenin retaining his power through the 1918 civil war. In 1921, Lenin introduced his New Economic Policy, aimed at gaining peace with the peasant class, which resulted in the ending of armed resistance to the communists. This support increased the Russian Communist Party’s (RCP) public influence greatly, backed in rural areas as well as urban working class districts. Due to all these factors, Lenin is the most important individual in changing the influence of the Russian communist party between 1905 and 1945.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The personality of those involved in the power struggle should however not be disregarded as they played a role in Stalin’s ensuing victory. Stalin was known to some members of his party as the grey blur as supposedly there was nothing remarkable about him. His role in the October revolution and the Russian civil war was minimal however his true aptitude lay in administrative positions, his skill in the clerical field was so great that Lenin came to rely on Stalin’s administrative capability and loyalty. Even so when Lenin became ill Stalin began to oppose him. Lenin’s testament was highly critical of Stalin and encouraged that he be removed, however as the testament was never made public this was never carried out. The fact that Stalin was not seen as threat and was underestimated by his peers meant that he was able to gain authority without raising the suspicions of other party members.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) How significant was Lenin’s leadership in the Bolshevik consolidation of power in the period to 1924?…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph Stalin established a modern totalitarian government in Soviet Russia. He is known as the “Man of Steel”. A totalitarianism is a type of government that takes total, centralized, state control over every aspect of public and private life of their people. His rule had changed the people of his empire in numerous ways. Stalin had total control over economic needs. According to document 6 “By 1940 Russia produced more pig iron than Germany, and far more than Britain or France. Numbers of cattle grew in the 1920s, but fell increasingly during the collectivization of agriculture after 1929, and by 1940 hardly exceeded the figure for 1920. Since 1940 the industrial development of the Soviet Union has been impressive, but agricultural production has continued to be plumiding”. The document illustrates how pig iron had significantly increased as a result of the “Five Year Plan”, however heavy industry led to expense of food supplies. This would cause limited production of consumer goods. It caused a step back because of the severe shortages of housing, food, clothing as well as other necessary goods. The Five Year Plan didn’t help much to excel their economic as Stalin hoped, it impacted by creating famine. Stalin rising to power promised an economic boom for Russia however, in that process many people suffered and died of starvation. According to document 5, “The purge began its last,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josephe Stalin DBQ

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stalin presented himself as if he were greater and more powerful than everyone else (DOC 10.) Unfortunately for him the people of Russia didn’t see this characteristic; Stalin’s methods damaged the Russians. His act of collectivization was found to be extremely unfair and hurtful. Numerous actions were taken place…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason is that Stalin, Bukharin, Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev had different ideologies which contradicted each other, the rules and the practices that Lenin already had in place. Trotsky represented the left wing of the party and believed in the rejection of the New Economic Party, being committed to immediate industrialisation and permanent revolution which was completely different to Bukharin who was on the right wing of the party. Bukharin believed in acceptance of the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation but in the distant future and wanted socialism in one country. On the other hand, Stalin was in the centre which meant that he had a pragmatic commitment to the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation in the near future and socialism should be in one country, which are both similar to Bukharin’s ideas on the right wing. Zinoviev and Kamenev swapped from right to left in 1925, which lost them credibility with the party. The fact that most of the contenders had such different ideas about how to run the country would have caused a struggle because they would not have been able to agree on something between them and would have been competing…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalinism, the term used to embody the form of government experienced by the Soviet Union under Stalin’s rule, had a significant and lasting impact on the USSR. Stalinism impacted on several aspects of life. Collectivisation was introduced which assisted in the funding of industrialisation, terror was used to create a communist state. Stalin centralised every aspect of life, from the single leadership of Stalin himself to party control of the state and its functions. Free will disappeared and service to the state was expected. Consequently a Stalinist state which had a major impact on the USSR was created.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The USSR (The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) was found in 1922 by Vladimir Lenin. The USSR was shortly taken over by Joseph Stalin, which lasted from the 1920’s to the 1953.(DeSomma, 12) During the time of Stalin’s ruling the NKVD (People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs), a secret police force, murdered many soviet citizens and jailed many others to Gulags. Gulags were forced labor camps that people were sent to if they were seen dangerous to the union. The Soviet then destroyed all owned farms to be replaced by state owned farms, this caused the Holomodor (1932- 1933). The Holomodor was a man made famine that killed 5 to 7 million peasants. The Great Purges (1937- 1938) were Stalin's attempt to remove any threats to the communist party continuance. Many people were killed or imprisoned each year. Numerous massacres occurred like the Vinnytsia Massacres, the Katyn Forest Massacre, and The Medvedev Forest Massacre. (Pierpaoli,1)…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    russian gulag

    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During 1917-1960, the Communist Party leaders and Soviet government considered that in order to secure the political stability and to conserve and strengthen positions of their social status, they needed working class, which must be kept under control. The GULAG Camp system was the best option. Lenin initiated the GULAG Concentration Camps after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution and they grew tremendously during Stalin’s era. The system used to isolate people that were against government and the system, who were socially dangerous, disobedient, suspicious or untrustworthy, thoughts that were preventing the dictatorship of the government. The GULAG, which is called “Correction By Forced Labor”, became a cheap labor force formed by prisoners. The economic system needs were responsible for GULAG formation that possessed both punitive and economic functions for Russian industry. The use of GULAG cheap physical labor in remote areas of the country made a significant contribution to the industry.…

    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lenin's Brutality

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While Lenin rose to power on the ideals of fighting for the people, he committed heinous crimes against anyone who he considered was a threat to his new government. In doing so, Lenin started the Red Terror, a period of time where the new government attempted to find anti- communist or pro- monarchy citizens, often killing or enslaving those that they found. A task force that was known as the Cheka was put in place for that goal. The Cheka, a task force whose name has no formal translation, hunted down citizens who Lenin considered a threat to his regime. As the government had many that opposed the communist government, the police force created terror throughout much of the Russian population. Although the exact numbers of executions and deaths from the Red Terror is not known, some historians think that as many as half a million were killed by the Cheka. Yet, executions were not the only horrors that the Red Terror spread throughout Russia. Many members of opposition parties were sent to labor camps, which would become known in the Western world as concentration camps. The civilians unfortunate enough to be sent there were forced to work in horrendous conditions. Because of the poor working environment, many died in the labor camps. Lenin also essentially abolished Russia’s religious freedom, often persecuting minority groups such as the Orthodox Church, Catholics,…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin’s purges of 1937 were debatably one of the most horrific events of the 1900s. Stalin, the General Secretary of the Soviet Union, decided that to be able to have a nation which aligned with his political ideas, he would need to eradicate those who he deemed went against these views. Stalin used the purges as a method to exercise his political control over his population and control the political spectrum. Stalin killed millions during the purges. About four years later, Hitler, the leader of Germany, conducted what is referred to today as the Holocaust.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paragraph will converse about the hatred between Stalin and Trotsky as both men fought for Lenin’s position (Getty, 1999). However once Stalin was in power, he exiled Trotsky because he was a political opponent (Getty, 1999). Stalin’s enemies were his political opponents and their followers. This will also discuss how Stalin’s political opponents were put on show trials, where they pleaded guilty to impossible charges of disloyalty (Getty,…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economic Systems

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This economic system had numerous features, both good and bad. Following the end of czarist rule, Vladimir Lenin, and later Joseph Stalin, came into power as leader of the Bolsheviks, or the Communists, those who deeply desired communist ideas for a government. Vladimir Lenin and his Communist Party established the Soviet Union, which by Joseph Stalin, was made into a communist and totalitarian state, which is ruled by one dictator. A factor of communism in Russia set by Stalin was the Great Purge. During this enforcement, those who resisted the government, going against their ideals, were executed or exiled from society. If any were even accused of opposition towards the government, they would be brutalized, murdered or removed from their country. This action sparked great fear in the people of the Soviet Union, as they were forced to be harshly subordinate to Stalin.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics