Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Biotechnology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
221 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Biotechnology
Any new technology is unpredictable, and this unpredictability produces concerns about risk (Straughan, 1996). Although genetic technology is regularly claimed to be accurate in targeting specific genes, it remains unpredictable in terms of the possible risk and unexpected consequences (Kaiser, 2003). With this being said, there are many uncertainties about the reliability of genetic technology and some include, the concern about the speed of animal biotechnology and how it can effect changes in animals, compared with traditional selective breeding which allows changes to be observed and assessed over many generations; concerns that animal biotechnology might constrict the gene pool and reduce genetic diversity; and finally concerns that genetically modified animals might be accidentally or deliberately released into the environment, causing various forms of ecological disaster (Straughan, 1996). It is impossible to prove that a particular event will or will not happen in the future. As, Dennis (2002) states, “no activity or process can ever be certain to present no risk and to be 100% “safe”, and animal biotechnology is no exception to this rational rule”. …show more content…
Any activity could possibly lead to terrible consequences and in order to study these possibilities closely, we now need to discuss the subject of animal welfare and ask whether the possible consequences of animal biotechnology might involve levels of pain and suffering which are ethically

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Imagine an animal’s feeling of panic and fear as it is about to be killed by a hunter or the isolation experienced as an animal sits in a laboratory, separated from its family and natural habitat, waiting to be harmed by harsh testing methods. Imagine the frightened state of a mother or father watching their innocent baby being captured. After considering the brutality towards animals in these scenarios, take into consideration the health benefits humans receive from different parts of these animals. Imagine health risks avoided through testing on animals first instead of on humans. Does human benefit justify the harm and killing of animals? Linda Hasselstrom’s essay “The Cow Versus The Animal Rights Activist” and Tom Regan’s “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” argue this question through analysis of the reason for killing animals, the method in which they are killed, and the morality of the killing of animals.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Humans are on a constant quest in the search for perfection and advancement in all areas of life through progressive scientific knowledge. From such a stance, the future of humans appears boundless with all the potential possibilities biotechnology provides, but such developments will cause ethical, social and biological implications.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    So this study aims to explain and give more understanding to the pros and cons of the genetically modified organism. It also aims to answer the questions; 1) What are the impacts of genetically modified organisms to human health and the environment. Is it safe or risky? And 2) Can GMOs be safe and useful in achieving sustainable…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miss

    • 8881 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Genetically Modified Organisms and Biosafety: A Background Paper for Decision-makers and Others to Assist in Consideration of GMO Issues. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Wald, M. (2013). GMO-Genetically Modified Organisms Dangerous or Necessary?. Original Internist, 20(3), 129-130 Weise, Elizabeth. (2013).…

    • 8881 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many current legal and ethical issues in bioengineering and biotechnology including athletic and cognitive enhancements, stem cell research, cloning, genetic engineering, and genetically modified organisms. Biotechnology is “the manipulation of biological systems and organisms through technological means”(p. 471). There is tension between valuing liberty to pursue happiness of biotechnologies, and the potential negative outcomes of these technologies. Bioengineering, is the construction of machines to alter or supplement organisms.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is often the conclusion of each royal commissions and of the microscopic wood Committee, and it 's supported by such a volume of proof on be on the far side dispute. This is often to not say that everyone animal experiments have helpful results and are so pragmatically justifiable; however the strategy of animal experimentation, on the entire, has been rewarded by the conquest of the many diseases and therefore the resulting advantages. Animal’s experiments are the bricks and mortar, in some cases the terribly foundations, of electronic equipment bioscience, we tend to pay poor tribute to the animals and people UN agency have used them productively if we demur from this conclusion. However, is it all profit? There are a lot of diabetics alive these days than there have been fifty years ago due to hormone, and most of them live helpful and nearly traditional lives. There are a lot of animals these days employed in laboratories for experiments than there have been fifty or 1OO years ago, and a few of those experiments cause pain to the animals: all of them cause distress to some those who disapprove of animal experiments and wish to envision them severely restricted or maybe…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal rights are one of the most controversial issues today. There has been endless debate about whether or not animals have rights. Philosophers attempt to come up with the moral conclusions by taking in account the many different standpoints and presenting their related arguments. In his essay “The case of animal rights”, Tom Regan, a professor of philosophy at North Carolina State University, defends his view that the center of our moral concern should not bring the suffering on animal as well as treating animals in a certain way. In other words, we should treat animals as if they are our property. We should only use them to benefit us and hurting them is an action that is not morally justifiable. In addition, in his article “All Animal Are Equal”, Peter Singer, an Australian philosopher, has many points which show us that we have responsibilities to protect animal rights. Singer’s argument in his essay gives us a great support to the argument that Reagan trying to discuss in terms of morally equal. In contrast, “The case of the use of animals in biomedical research” by Carl Cohen, a philosophy professor at University of Michigan Medical School, although he agrees with Regan’s idea in terms of moral rights as well as practices that essentially involve harming animals are morally unjustified, he strongly supports for the use of animal in medical research, and scientific experiments to avoid risking human lives. “The case of animal rights”, “all animal are equal” and “The case of the use of animals in biomedical research” introduce to us a new thinking about treating animals.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APA Code Of Ethics Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Experimentations on animals can cause various types of pains. In the APA code of ethics, it states that animals should be treated as humanely as possible, unless there is no other way (Bayard, 229). However, this goal should be justified by the “prospective scientific. Educational, or applied value” (Bayard, 229).There is a distinction made between humans and animals when humans are registered under the animal domaine. Homo sapiens are not any better than any other species, and it is not fair, that the other species have to suffer at the expense of potentially benefitting another species.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opponents of the practice of genetic engineering in animals, like those that oppose crop genetic engineering, do so because of the risk associated with the practice and because they feel it would not do anything to help fight world hunger. However, the practice of genetic engineering in animals sparks a new group of opponents. These new group of opponents oppose the practice for ethical reasons. Brenda Almond, in “Commodifying Animals: Ethical Issues in Genetic Engineering of Animals,” states “it is, of course, true that the crossing of species and the creation of new forms of life seems to set humans a god-like challenge” (98). It appears that the author, like those who oppose the practice for ethical reasons, believes that there is only…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For hundreds of years, humans have selectively bred and crossbred animals and plants to create or eliminate specific characteristics to produce a wider range of crops, animals and livestock. Genetic technology has become very common in our world today. Therefore, the possibility of altering plants and specifically crops for food supply raises many ethical and possible health issues which need to be explored. For example, the technical aspects of genetic modification and the possible positive and negative effects of genetically modified foods. Genetic engineering might be the phenomenon of the twentieth century, however genetic technology began over 30,000 years ago (Rangel).…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine being confined to a cold cage, no bigger than you, without family, or friends, watching, as one by one, your compatriots leaving, but never come back, waiting silently for your turn. Good morning audience of the Federal Youth Parliament, this is what many animals endure before their final moments, tortured, hurt, and isolated. Animal experimenting is a national system of sadistic torture, vivisection, and genocide, which has been carried out for generations under the disguise of “medical research” and definitely must be stopped. The three main reasons for banning this grotesque science are: present experimentation is currently not species specific therefore results are inaccurate, killing for beauty is not worth it, and animals are more useful alive.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hawkins, P., Hau, J., Carlsson, H., Hagelin, J., Roberts, I., Meredith, M., . . . Botting, J. (2001). Animal Research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 322(7302), 1603-1605. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy1.library.arizona.edu/stable/25467253…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the years of medical research, scientists have immorally exploited animals in the sense that they cannot decide for themselves. They have continually tested animals without the remorse of an animal having a life but only thinking of them as a prized possession; a toy easily thrown away. The truth about animal experimentation is that the world does not need…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to a natural organic food store, “Animals endure chemicals being dripped into their eyes, injected into their bodies, forced up their nostrils or forced down their throats. They are addicted to drugs, forced to inhale/ingest toxic substances, subjected to maternal deprivation, deafened, blinded, burned, stapled, and infected with disease viruses”. An animal research lab in the UK argues though exclaiming that, “Animal research has played a vital part in nearly every medical breakthrough over the last decade”. It all comes down to whether a human life is more valuable than an…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of animal experimentation has increased tremendously over the globe. Animal research is immoral because animals are being subjected to not being properly advocated for, are experiencing detrimental testing and there are alternative methods other than crucial animal experiments. Animal testing is defined as a scientific experiment to where a live animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause them “fear, discomfort, pain or distress” (Fisher). Animal experiments include injecting them with harmful substances, exposing animals to radiation, removing organs, forcing them to inhale toxic gases, and other horrifying procedures. Although through animal testing some diseases have been cured, there…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays