Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experiments

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experiments
How would you feel if you were captured in a laboratory and forced to smell toxic fumes until death? Or immobilized in a restraining device for hours? Or have your skin burned off and spinal cord crushed? This is the reality for more than 100 million animals worldwide. In Canada, over 3.33 million animals are used in experiments and over 125 000 are subjected to severe pain. The animals are left for days to wait in fear of the next terrifying and traumatic experiment that will be performed on them. Major effects of stress and boredom trigger neurotic behaviors in the animals these include spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, pulling out their own hair and biting their own skin. Days go by, and after being locked in their tiny cages filled with fear, their journey usually ends with death. Animals are said to be used for advances and safety checks in products, but are the tests truly …show more content…
Therefore most of these animal tests are inaccurate. Diseases that may develop in humans are genetically engineered differently than any other animal. This relates back to the unethical side, as millions of animals are being tortuously killed just to be disposed of. Animal tests have no way of predicting the outcomes or results on a human, medical treatment is very specific to the individual being treated. Prescribed medicines are unique and are tweaked to work for that human specifically, testing on a whole new species does not effectively correspond to the human body.
Along with animal testing, comes many newly developed tests that do not involve animals in any way. Scientific advances have led some companies to thankfully turning to a cruelty-free approach. Some of these companies include Lush, NYX, Smashbox, Aveda

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Peta website provides information and facts against animal testing. It contains practices that are done on innocent animals for research such as cosmetic, scientific, experimentation, and drug purposes. The animals that are used for unethical research consists of fish, mice, monkeys, dogs, birds and rabbits. The website describes the unethical procedures that they do on innocent animals. Animals are forced to breath in very toxic fumes and have their head drilled before they die. The innocent animals are treated inhumanely since they are treated as lab equipment rather than animals.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early on, the elimination of animal testing was unfeasible because it was the only available source. However, technology advancements in the late 20th and early 21st centuries have introduced alternative methods that are often cheaper and more relevant to humans. William Russell and Rex Burch first introduced the 3R’s of animal research in 1959. These R’s stand for the reduction, refinement, and replacement of the use of animals in research and testing. Many alternative methods that have come forward follow these ethics. More than 40 alternatives have been validated and approved world-wide with many more under way. There are a variety of cell-based skin tests, called EPISKIN, EpiDerm, and SkinEthic that can be used to assess the safety of drugs, chemicals, and cosmetics on humans. Organs-on-chips contain human cells grown in a system that mimics the structure and function of human organs. Researchers have also developed computer models that predict and show the ways drugs react to the human body. According to the former scientific executive of Huntingdon Life Sciences, animal tests and human tests agree 5-25 percent of the time, while cell culture toxicology, another alternative form of animal testing, agrees 80-85 percent of the time.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personaly I don't think that there are many pros about this subject, but I've written down a few.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An issue that many people debate is if animal testing should remain legal or be banned. Did you know that Europe, which is the world’s biggest cosmetic producer, banned animal testing for cosmetics (11 Facts About Animal Testing)? Sure, animal testing has made some great medical breakthroughs like insulin. There are also downfalls to animal testing. One example is that the experimenters are torturing the animals and the test subjects are painfully tested on. These reasons show that animal testing should be banned, it harms animals, there are better options, and animals and humans are very different.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists typically use animals for testing purposes because they are considered similar to humans. As such, researchers do recognise the limitations and differences but the testing is done on animals because they are thought to be the closest match and best one with regards to applying this data to humans.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to advanced technology, scientists have found many new options for testing that avoid animal cruelty. Over the years scientists have found testing on Lab-grown cells and organs to be a great alternative to animal testing. This is commonly used for testing cosmetics and some believe if this method continues to develop, animal testing will eventually decrease in popularity and be seen as unnecessary. Another option is human clinical tests. These tests consist of humans voluntarily trying new drugs, biological products, and medical devices. Although there are risks of the experiment causing harm or injury, keep in mind that these clinical tests are voluntary and us humans have the choice, unlike…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine this, you are a cute little beagle puppy, locked in a cage inside of a research lab. The scientists who have you locked in that cage are trying to find cures for certain diseases and illnesses. They would take you out of your cage and take some blood samples, and then they inject you with a sedative so they can start their experiments. Some of the experiments may cause you to die, or get sick. But one thing is for certain, you will never be the puppy that gets to live with a nice family, and live a happy life.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of these subjects are given random drugs or chemicals to test the affects they might have, even though these could potentially harm or even kill these animals. Others are burned, poisoned, shocked, or exposed to other traumatic events to study the psychological affects. Some are even given way to much food and have…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Unethical

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When treating the animals with an experiment or even the living conditions that these animals are put into, experimenters aren’t taking into consideration how much pain or turmoil that the animals are experiencing. In an article written by ProCon, the author states “According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation.” (ProCon, 2016). Experimenters are more focused on the results and the reactions from the testing products rather than the well-being of these animals. Ethics and morality take a huge role in animal testing and research. Many moralists wants to give several reasons on why animal testing is wrong, but they all share one common piece of information. This type of experimentation is immoral. One of the most outstanding parts of this research is the lack of laws that protect animals from experiencing cruelty during experimentation. In an article by the Atlantic, it is stated “scientific men to animals should be under any laws or restrictions save those general ones which regulate the behavior of all men so as to protect animals from cruelty.”. (Dewey, 1926). Experimenters are allowed to conduct experiments with as much pain infliction as desired, under one condition. Pain is allowed to be inflicted on the test subject if it meant not inflicting pain on human beings. Again,…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Animal Testing

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Economist article, “Be Nice to Mice… Animal Testing,” notes that only one in every ten drugs tested on animals actually works on humans. This is because they are fed a lot to keep their bodies warm since they are kept in cool conditions. The cool conditions are said to keeps their temper at bay. But eating as much as they do alters the way they metabolize the drug. There are many different factors that are involved that make animal testing results difficult to translate into a hypothesis for what human results would be. James-Enger, author of Vegetarian Times article “Beyond Animal Testing,” states that using animals to predict how humans will react to the same drug or medical treatment is not a good experiment due to the difference in anatomy between humans and animals. Even testing animals with similar DNA, like chimpanzees, is not a good test because they do not react the same way as humans. For example, chimps, being our closest relatives, still did not contract AIDS when introduced to the HIV virus (Kelly). Another faulty test occurred when testing a drug called fenphen. Animals showed no serious side effects, but when tested on humans it caused heart-valve defects and was taken off the market (Kelly). There are quite a few recalls due to the inaccuracy of animal experimentation. It has also been prevalent that many tests have been over tested for no…

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals are put through so many awful things you wouldn’t even believe. Animals are restrained and burned, starved, dehydrated, and purposefully hurt to test remedies and healing processes. Does that sound fair? How about this? Some animals are killed by carbon dioxide. Neck breaking, or even decapitation. Listen to this, the Draize Eye Test where they hold a rabbit's eyelids open by clips so they can’t blink the products away. According to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported in 2010 that 97,123 animals suffered from experiments.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Test animals have been “purpose bred”, meaning that not only them but the animals that gave birth to them have been tested and force bred by doctors and scientist also. Animal testing is conducted by universities, the military, government agencies corporations, contract research organizations, cleaning suppliers, and a large variety of cosmetic companies. Although there are regulations to using animals for testing, many companies sadly do not follow them and treat the animals extremely unfair. These regulations are replacement, reduction, and refinement. Replacement meaning use of non-animal…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is unreliable. For example, Dr. Richard Kluasher, the former director of the national cancer institute states that “ We have cured cancer in mice for decades and it simply didn't work in humans”. This statement shows the unreliability of animal testing. Just because it worked on a…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medicines such as insulin, the polio vaccine, lithium, and penicillin were all tested on animals. After all humans share around 95% of genes with mice making them a prime test subject. Humans and animals also have similar organs which do either the same or slightly different functions. While the experiments seem harsh and inhumane the scientists have to follow strict laws to ensure the animal's well being worldwide. Most scientists use the “Three R’s” method. The Three Rs are Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement. Replacement is using non animal methods when animal use is not necessary. Reduction is using the fewest amount of animals possible for an experiment. Finally, Refinement is using the best way possible to reduce as much suffering as possible. Since 1901 almost every Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medicine has used some form of animal research. The creator of the Polio vaccine Albert Sabin said “Without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year.” Vivisection helped create treatment for syphilis, malaria, smallpox, etc. It even helped scientists learn about tumors and brain disorders. While animal testing has several benefits not a lot of people are happy with how the animals have been treated during the…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In addition to the brutal tortures that happens in laboratories, genetic manipulation is a common kind of experimentation on primates, cats, dogs, mice, rats, and many other creatures. Due to the abnormalities and diseases, many of these animals are unable to live on. As for animals’ daily living conditions, they spend their lives in cages, not being able to live freely with choices or communicate. They never get to experience the outdoors of fresh air and sunshine, instead, they are contained within bars and walls. Not only that, their cages are small and crowded, and they live with loud noises and bright lights that are known to cause stress in animals. Days after days in laboratories, they experience ongoing mental and physical suffering from fear, boredom, confinement, and emotional stress. In addition to those sufferings, they live to endure the continuous procedures with fear and agony (“Harm and Suffering”). Although researchers have admitted to knowing that abused animals used for testings in…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays