Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Government Regulating Food

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
367 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Government Regulating Food
People may disagree with the government regulating our food. Those who disagree might say that it is unfair and that they should be able to regulate what they are putting in their own bodies. Be that as it may, there are also ways that this could be a good thing. It can stop overeating, keep people healthy, and even help people's education level.

Government regulation of food can stop people from eating or drinking more than they really need to. For example, In the article “Goodbye, Big Soda” Alice Park addresses the government's ban of soft drinks larger than 16 ounces. This ban shows that the government needs to regulate our intake because we are not doing it ourselves.This regulation helps because people will not be over drinking as a
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 2.1 - the Public Needs to Know - Tyra Geiselman
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assignment 2.1 - the Public Needs to Know - Tyra Geiselman

    The main benefit of the school board trying to regulate healthier foods into their breakfast and lunch menu is to make sure our youth are eating right and getting all the nutrients they need to live a strong and healthy life. They want to make sure, even if they aren’t eating right at home, they are getting some sort of healthy foods. Even if it is only once a day, they are hoping that this new impact will be a start to students wanting to eat healthier and be more active.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Food Police Summary
    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Food Police Summary

    In today’s world we witness horrible epidemics and tragedies on a seemingly daily basis. There are groups of people out there, groups that Jayson Lusk refers to as the “food police” in his book so aptly titled, “The Food Police,” who choose to focus their energies on creating pseudo-controversies by using false or flawed research and drawing conclusions based on emotion rather than on logic. The food police have managed to influence the thinking of our media, schools, and even our government. By constantly spewing propaganda supporting their questionable claims, the food elite have made it clear that they seek a sort of totalitarianism when it comes to the food that you and I are buying and consuming.…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Genetically Modified Foods
    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Genetically Modified Foods

    A few pros would have to be, Foods can be modified to have more essential vitamins and nutrients, or simply taste better. By doing this, the increase in variety, and convenience for foods allows others to get their needed vitamins, and nutrients from just plants rather than having to buy supplements. Genetically modified foods are part of our daily diet and reassuringly enough appear to be quite healthy for us. Some would see this as a plus because everyone is looking for new ways to be healthier and GMO's give you that option. There are no known health risks so it is a matter of belief whether or not you want to trust in genetically modified foods. If you are willing to try GMO's then you will be surprised to see that the downsides are very…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trace Analysis on Attacks of the Food Police
    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Trace Analysis on Attacks of the Food Police

    Constraints: The author is constrained by the beliefs that there has to be a change in how the fast food companies are marketing and producing there food products. He believes that the ‘food police’ have to keep doing their job in order for a change to come about. They feel very strongly that these companies need to make people aware of what is really going into their food, not just what they say is going into it. He is also constrained by how companies like McDonalds are spending 36 million dollars to market their food to us whereas companies like the National Cancer act are spending 1 million dollars to try and advertise to eat healthy fruit and veg.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Soda Ban
    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Soda Ban

    This shows that if someone wants choose a bigger drink knowing that it may not be a really good choice for their health, that is still their choice. People do not need to have other people make choices for them. In conclusion it is important for the public to make their own decisions because not only is our country really big on freedom and independence but the public are the only people who know what they…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Sugar Nation Controversy
    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Sugar Nation Controversy

    “How far should the Government go to protect us from ourselves?” (Huffingtonpost.com). That is a question some New Yorkers have been asking themselves since September 13th, 2012, when the New York City board of public health officially put into effect a ban of selling sugary, soft drinks over 16 ounces (about half a liter). This soda ban has divided the city separating residents into two distinct views. Will this new ban benefit New York City and create yet another stepping stone against the obesity epidemic, or is it an unnecessary abuse of power by the government, that is unfair to big corporations and businesses?…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Maggie Valentine Obesity
    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Maggie Valentine Obesity

    government wrongly spends billions of tax-payer dollars, just so they can assist food companies to gain more profits and subsidize foods. For example, the federal government annually spends approximately $38 billion in meat and dairy product subsidization. Although, national dietary guidelines encourage Americans to eat more fruits and vegetables, only about $17 million out of the $38 billion are spent towards produce. Additionally, two-thirds of American farmers received no funds from the last 15 years’ worth of subsidies, equivalent to $100 billion. Instead, those funds went towards corporation-owned-factory farms, which, hurt local economies and made meat and dairy production cheaper. Besides the subsidization costs, the government also spent an additional $550 million in marketing expenses, in order to boost sales for meat and dairy products. In fact, each dollar (of the $550 million) increases meat and dairy sales by $8, annually, which would be an additional $4.6 billion invested in the meat and dairy industry (“10 Things We Wish Everyone Knew About the Meat and Dairy Industries”). By subsidizing the meat and dairy industries, the government has unduly encouraged Americans to predominantly consume those products, which may contribute to future health complications. When meat and dairy are the primary components in a person’s diet, people miss out on the benefits other foods can offer; particularly, fruits and vegetables, which offer a variety of benefits, including the following: lots of vitamins and minerals; may reduce the chance of being diagnosed with many diseases; and fiber-rich produce that help with digestion; that is to say, all essential to a healthy…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Portion Control and Regulations
    • 3360 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Portion Control and Regulations

    McDonald’s sells over 75 hamburgers every second, and who eats a hamburger without a drink. (Lubin). Who gets a drink without fries…I’m sure you see the problem. It’s a violent cycle, and it’s the buttocks and thighs that take the brunt of it, not to mention the heart. The term supersize has been coined by the McDonald’s franchise, it refers to enlarging the sides on a standard combo meal--what they fail to mention is you too will be supersized. These treacherous “extras” add up to about 850 calories (Matthews). If every hamburger was sold with supersized sides, McDonalds’ would output 2,010,420,000,000 calories a year off of fries and sodas alone. It is no coincidence that America is now dealing with a major health epidemic--The rate of obesity and type two diabetes have spiked dramatically in the American population over the past 60 years. This isn’t a silent killer. It’s a self-inflicted condition and the cure starts with self-restraint when it comes to those empty drink calories. Since the year 2006, not a single state has reported an obesity level at lower than ten percent, and the majority of states considered over 25 percent of their population to be obese (Bird). New York Mayor, Michael Bloomberg, has taken the first step to bring American portions back down to reasonable volumes. In passing a law banning sugary drinks over 16 ounces, he attempts to lower obesity and related health problems. The Federal Government should follow New York City ordinates and ban high sugar drinks over 16 ounces for the benefit of American health.…

    • 3360 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soda Ban Research Paper
    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Soda Ban Research Paper

    In addition, the act would be ineffective because large quantities of soda could still be purchased ("Public Health Concerns: Sugary Drinks). Also, those who do not see eye to eye with the ban, believe that taking away this right may actually backfire by drawing more attention to unhealthy items like large sodas. People are making a mountain out of a molehill; people should be allowed to make their own choices. Mayor Bloomberg’s plan to limit serving sizes of sugary beverages aims to reduce sugar intake and fight against obesity ("The New York Soda Ban."). In addition, research shows that sugary drinks are one of the major causes of obesity and diabetes, and evidence indicates that high consumption of sugary drinks increases the risk for heart disease. Although sugary drinks are not completely healthy, genetics can also contribute to obesity ("The New York Soda Ban."). For example, "Obesity is a serious and complex public health issue facing our nation and the rest of the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arguments Against Banning Soda
    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arguments Against Banning Soda

    The government regulation of people's dieting is wrong, they are collectivism. This is not right, everyone is not the same. It absurd to make people stop drinking what they want and what they want to eat. They are trying to become a dystopia state, the government is trying to control everything that a person is doing. Is not their chose to tell people to lose weight. I'm guessing they know what they are doing. Banning sodas and putting how many calories the food has is not really going to change their option. The government is making it seem like everyone need to lose weight. Who do they think they are, by telling and banning candy machines and soda from people. Plus, if you break that rule, they will have to pay $200. They are exaggerating with the power they have.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Should The Government Have The Major Role In Health Care Reform?
    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should The Government Have The Major Role In Health Care Reform?

    Although reducing access to unhealthful foods may produce desirable effects, such as decreased rates of childhood obesity, more feasible interventions which protect individuals’ freedom of choice should take priority when implementing methods to improve the populations’ health and diet. Furthermore, simply eliminating access to unhealthful food is not only an infringement on individual’s rights, but does not address the root cause of the rising rates of obesity. If children do not receive the proper education required to understand the importance of moderation, healthy dietary choices and physical activity than the cycle would continue and rate of preventable conditions, such as type two diabetes mellitus, would continue rise as the children who were once banned from purchasing unhealthy food became of age and gained access. In order to truly, and significantly, reduce the cost of healthcare, I believe there needs to be increased utilization of primary and secondary prevention measures both for adolescents and adults…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Soda Should Be Banned
    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Soda Should Be Banned

    Restriction is a popular way to limit how much of a dangerous substance goes into our bodies. Such as alcohol or energy drinks where too much can severely harm the body. What if I told you there was another substance that a lot of people consume everyday. I am talking about soda and the recent soda cap size ban. The soda ban helps to inform people on what a healthy amount of soda should look like and also helps raise awareness on important consequences that could occur when overindulge. With the knowledge of how much is too much and what damage could occur in your body, you can make sound healthy decisions that can help better your health and future.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Food in America: a Controversy
    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Food in America: a Controversy

    It is often said that, “You are what you eat,” food is an essential provision that cannot be taken for granted. The access for food is crucial and the food people put in their body is significant. Food determines various aspect of the human body such as, body shape, production of energy and ultimately overall health. The American lifestyle is based on time, speed and efficiency; therefore the American people tend to be oblivious on what they put inside their body. Society in America, particularly poor people, are forced to live in an environment where food leads to obesity or health problems, and the rich gain more access on fresh, healthy diet with low fat and salt. American’s perspective on time has dramatically transformed the way they eat and how they eat food. Instead of viewing food as a substance to be delight in, the appreciation for food has deteriorated, in other words, food has become a “means” to an end. Food is the ultimate hot-button issue because everyone eats it and no one wants to feel guilty about what they’re eating. Food can be as sensitive a subject as religion or politics. Ultimately, as the passion and eagerness for food in America increases, it becomes difficult to bridge the gap of feeding America with healthy nutritious diet.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Junk Food
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Junk Food

    The introduction of prohibition in the United States meant people could not manufacture or consume alcohol. Alcohol was banned by the government for obvious reasons, alcohol harms the body. Use of drugs without prescription is illegal and harms one’s health. Junk foods and soda pop are harmful as well. Yet we have never had prohibition on these food and soda items even though these food items affect public health. According to Yale University professor of psychology and public health, Kelly Brownell, “As a culture, we’ve become upset by the tobacco companies advertising to children, but we sit idly by while the food companies do the very same thing. And we could make a claim that the toll taken on the public health by a poor diet rivals that taken by tobacco”.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Government Controlled Diet
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Government Controlled Diet

    Should the government have a say in Americans diets? One of the fastest growing problems in the United States today is obesity. Throughout the last ten years, more and more people have become overweight or obese. Obesity has caused a lot of damage because it has increased healthcare costs and ruined many people 's lives because they can contract diseases like diabetes. If the government had a say in American citizen 's diets, they will be violating people 's privacy. In contrast, many people may not follow the governments operated diet system. The government should have a say in Americans diets because it help many people in many ways.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics