The Pros And Cons Of Information Censorship

Freedom of expression is a guaranteed right to every U.S citizen, but it must be exercised with due care to protect infringement of other people's rights. Information censoring is the act of controlling communication between people. Censoring includes the restriction of what information may be passed, seen and heard. The state government frequently practices information censoring, and it is a violation of human rights and the freedom of speech. Therefore, the American people do not believe that information censorship is right since it violates the human right of liberty of expression.
I. Background
Freedom of Speech is a right of every individual in democratic society. Freedom of speech has been established as one of the significant human rights in any constitution under the Bill of Rights there forth freedom of expression constitutes a human right that every individual should have, and it must be respected, however, the right to freedom of speech can be termed as war. It is a war that has been going on
Introduction
The freedom of speech informs people on daily happenings, creates awareness, and passes information, but it can be harmful when it is unfounded or when it becomes subjective. The liberty of freedom of speech can be termed as a double-edged sword that can cause change to many things such as lives, history and civilization. When freedom of speech is used to spread unfounded information, rumor and propaganda, threw that freedom requires being limitation Information censorship aims to limit the radical information from reaching the people in a democratic country, but it restricts the freedom of speech. Information censorship in most cases censors moral, political, religious and military information. Moral censorships restrict people's access to obscene materials. It aims to protect the children from any form of corruption. The definition of moral censorship of obscene material, especially on the internet, is very narrow (Day, Nancy, 2001,