Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Racial Profiling

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
786 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Racial Profiling
Racial profiling by police has been in the news more than it has ever been before. People have been shot and killed by police only because on how they look suspicious and they haven’t caused any harm to any one around them. Racial Profiling by police is wrong because it has been ineffective and it has led to deaths of people of color and has also lead to arrests. Racial profiling is ineffective and it abuses practices that target innocent people based of how they look, and a strategy that shouldn’t be used in law enforcement. In a recent incident two men of color were arrested in a “Philadelphia Starbucks, waiting for a business meeting and when they asked to use the restroom they were denied, and later on arrested for not wanting …show more content…
Even though racial profiling is illegal in most states, law enforcement still chose to do it but always say that they don’t discriminate someone who has no reason to be stopped or asked for identification. Earlier this year “Stephon Clark was shot and killed by police because they thought that he was holding a gun when he was actually holding his phone” Lockhart). This shows racial profiling because police were told that just because they were near a black person, that it was him who they looking for and shot him without trying to ask Clark questions and without further explanation. In most cases when police shot civilians they don’t get prosecuted for killing an innocent person, and instead the civilians family need to live without their loved one. I do believe that racial profiling is ineffective because it's it only targeting people of color and civilians having to distrust the police because they also fear that they might start to question them and when people start to distrust the law enforcement people believe that the law is not being enforced equally across all communities and start to also distrust the government. Other people do seem to think that racial profiling does work and that it should be used by the police to “get the job done” (“Racial …show more content…
And the use of profiling someone should be prioritized and used by all of the law enforcement. The opposition side also believes that racial profiling is not only used on people of color but to everyone, and yes it is used on mostly everyone but the people who get the most hurt or killed are people of color. They are the ones who have to get stopped,searched or prosecuted by law enforcement for sometimes doing nothing or reaching for their pocket. Racial profiling is a big issue and having the police say that they treat every civilian equal is not right because they don’t and it shouldn't be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Racial profiling is supposed to be illegal but there are many cases that show that it is still happening in the United States. We have seen a lot of racial profiling since the events of 9/11 but African Americans have been racially profiled way before that event happened. I personally have been a victim of racial profiling and was pulled over for no apparent reason other than the fact that I was African American. Although I agree that the nation’s security is very important I don’t agree on signaling certain people out just because of their race. This is something that Whites would rarely if ever have to deal…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand some officials believe racial profiling is necessary because it can save people from criminal activity before it begins, sparing injury to anyone. Protectors of profiling do not approve of the racial component of the matter. Defenders believe identifying tendencies of a criminal and being proactive make a decent officer. Even though my viewpoint does not approve of the defenders, the opinion has to be shared and addressed. Much of the perception of profiling really just has to do with the training of the particular officer and where they get their…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Racial profiling means a standard of unequal protection. Blacks and even Latinos are most likely…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling Summary

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The article “Should Racial Profiling Be Accepted as a Law Enforcement Practice?”, published by ProCon.org discusses the pros and cons on if racial profiling should be practiced by the law enforcement. Those in favor of this practice admit that people of color are targeted more by law enforcement agencies because they are the ones who usually commit crimes. When officers practiced racial profiling, the reports that had been made showed that minorities were the ones mostly committing crime. Those opposing this proposition explain why racial profiling is an inefficient strategy. Many minorities arrested due to racial profiling, who are falsely convicted and imprisoned end up being innocent. Let’s face it, racial profiling is an excuse, disguised as a reason, for law enforcement agencies to target people of color/minorities.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First off as stated in an article on Occupytherapy.com, “Racial profiling can help law enforcement find a possible suspect based on racial cues. Statistically certain ethnicities are more likely to commit certain types of crimes.”(Profiling Pros and Cons List) This fact has helped many police officers and investigators to locate the guilty suspect and put them to justice for their crimes. Another pro of racial profiling is that it in a way delivers a sense of belonging to one's own ethnic group. For example as a result of racial profiling African American’s have a sense of understanding of one another's struggle of “being black in America”. Although this fact is sad to say the least, many African Americans can share that when they are around police officers they feel a sense of panic and the urge to “act normal”, no matter what they’re doing, whether it’d be walking their dog or driving to the local convenience store. These pro’s of racial profiling are contradictory because in reality their are no pros to racial…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    They believe that some tactics are not really racial profiling. The search for specific suspects is not racial profiling, but the search for people who belong to a general category is profiling (Clegg, Profiling Terrorist). In other words, it is not a problem if the police set standards to classify among terrorists’ characteristics including ethnic group, religion or age and apply those specific elements to find terrorists. John Ibbitson says the racial profiling is both necessary and desirable (“Why racial profiling is a good idea”). On the day of the 9/11 attacks, the guy whose name is strange and has dark skin persisted in taking flying lessons would have excited police suspicions. However, if a middle-aged European woman instead of the guy said that, it wouldn’t have been suspicious and police wouldn’t have taken it seriously. In “When Profiling Makes Sense,” Jonah Goldberg says the author compares racial profiling to a slot machine game: if everyone knew that one slot machine paid out 10 percent more often than any other, the line for that slot machine would be a lot longer than all the others - and not just 10 percent longer - because 10 percent is a very significant advantage. In other words, all Middle Easterners aren’t terrorists, but many terrorists in question are from the Middle East. That is why racial profiling is…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stereotyping and discrimination based simply on a difference in race are two things which are continually discouraged and condemned throughout our legal system, yet are promoted by even the Supreme Court when used by law enforcement in the practice of racial profiling. Police officers nationwide badger pedestrians, make traffic stops, and unjustly search citizens daily sometimes with their only reason being the color of the person 's skin. It is this practice, racial profiling, which encourages law enforcement officials to discriminate against the very citizens they are hired to protect and to be suspicious of all people that might fit the "drug courier" profile. Basically, when applied to the police 's practice or racial profiling, this means that…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though police officers may prevent a crime, in some cases the stop-and-frisk method is not always necessary. According to Beverly Rice an expert in law, avers, “While officers believe the stop and frisk law is a useful crime fighting tool, they also feel the law can be overused in an effort to boost statistics.” This shows that not only does the citizens know that stop-frisk-method is unnecessary but also the police officers and their colleagues know this to be true. Racial profiling is a cover up for something bigger. Also according to Beverly Rice an expert in law, she states “Some patrol officers complain…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Racial profiling in america has brought big controversy against the law enforcement. There has been many videos shown on social media where a specific race have been violently handled by police. But behind all these videos are evidence or reasons why the officer stopped the person. I think that based on what part they are in, they are given information about crimes. They are told that certain things like if they if they wear or do something specific and people commit the crimes. Or they look unfamiliar to the place. The bad thing about racial profiling is that it is unfair to judge people by their race. I think people should be judge by their individual actions and not by their race. Police have caused so much anger towards them because of…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most common use of racial profiling is traffic stops. This is one purpose I definitely don’t believe racial profiling should be used. This makes it harder for African Americans to go about their business in certain areas of time without being bothered, especially at night. Now having racial profiling being used in a situation so little, it has made it to where the action is being done whether it is a search, arrest, or any sort of contact. That is why it is such a big issue. A lot of people believe racial profiling is going to the extent of being racist, even though that might not be every police officers intent. I agree that it could make solving crimes such as murder, burglary or rape…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, any unusual treatment regardless of the intent of the police can be seen as a violation of the individual’s right. Racial profiling is, by definition, based on a standard of unequal protection. People of color are more likely to be searched by police and less likely to be treated as law-abiding citizens, whereas white people are less likely to be searched by police at all. Racial profiling transgresses against this right as it allows law enforcement officials to intentionally subject people of color to unequal treatment without probable cause or adequate…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, we need to have more people realize that racial profiling is not an effective system and instead demoralizes people of color. While some believe racial profiling can help stop crime, criminal behavior cannot be determined…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Enforcements argue that they do not practice Racial Profiling and it does not exist in police’s workforce. Frank Gale a police officer in Denver Country Sheriff’s Department for twenty-three years and is national second vice president of the Fraternal Order of Police in his speech posted in opposing viewpoints, “The End Racial Profiling Act is Highly Flawed and Should Not Be Passed” he argues that The End of Racial Profiling Act is nonsense and will result a big burden to the police’s workforce. He is totally against the passing of this act because he believes that Racism in Law Enforcement does not exist. Officer Gale states: “I want to begin by saying very clearly that racism is wrong. It is wrong to think a person is a criminal because of the color of his skin.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial profiling can occur if an officer, based on your appearance, race or even ethnicity, stops you. Racial profiling is illegal, which it violates the U.S. constitution’s promise of equal protection under the law to all and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. “Profiling racially becomes ineffective, communities separate from law enforcement, hinders policing efforts and causes law enforcement to lose trust they sworn to protect and serve.” More then 240 years ago there was slavery. And there was “90 years of legalized racial segregation have led to systemic profiling of blacks in traffic and pedestrian stops”.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling is an act that needs to end because, it's harmful to the public and, can be offensive. Racial profiling can also have deadly repercussions,…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays