Even though racial profiling is illegal in most states, law enforcement still chose to do it but always say that they don’t discriminate someone who has no reason to be stopped or asked for identification. Earlier this year “Stephon Clark was shot and killed by police because they thought that he was holding a gun when he was actually holding his phone” Lockhart). This shows racial profiling because police were told that just because they were near a black person, that it was him who they looking for and shot him without trying to ask Clark questions and without further explanation. In most cases when police shot civilians they don’t get prosecuted for killing an innocent person, and instead the civilians family need to live without their loved one. I do believe that racial profiling is ineffective because it's it only targeting people of color and civilians having to distrust the police because they also fear that they might start to question them and when people start to distrust the law enforcement people believe that the law is not being enforced equally across all communities and start to also distrust the government. Other people do seem to think that racial profiling does work and that it should be used by the police to “get the job done” (“Racial …show more content…
And the use of profiling someone should be prioritized and used by all of the law enforcement. The opposition side also believes that racial profiling is not only used on people of color but to everyone, and yes it is used on mostly everyone but the people who get the most hurt or killed are people of color. They are the ones who have to get stopped,searched or prosecuted by law enforcement for sometimes doing nothing or reaching for their pocket. Racial profiling is a big issue and having the police say that they treat every civilian equal is not right because they don’t and it shouldn't be