Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Rejection Of Torture

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1581 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Rejection Of Torture
Brandon Balsirow
Professor Long
Hon. Good and Evil
11 December 2017
Word Count: 1541
Rejection of Torture Under Any Circumstance Torture should never be used in any form or case, not even in the ticking time bomb scenario. The use of torture should not be dependent of ideology, whether it be authoritarian, communist, liberal, and anywhere in between. This is truly a matter of morality. Torture strips us of our humanity and we must wonder how a civilized society could ever permit such a barbaric act. Being born in a free country, I never had to worry about being tortured. I also have never seen someone tortured, nor have I heard of someone I know having been tortured. Not having experienced torture first-hand, it is difficult to grasp the full …show more content…
The suspect in custody is pleading the fifth and will not disclose the location of the bomb. In this example, it is extremely difficult for someone to say “No” to torture because they believe that it will ultimately save a lot of lives if the suspect is tortured and the bomb is found and secured before it detonates. This leads to hasty responses without the full grasp of short-term and long-term implications of torture. This scenario’s ultimate purpose is to make an exception for when torture is acceptable. “Prohibitionists” can no longer oppose torture completely and now must decide on what types of torture and for what purpose it is used. I reject the notion to agree with torture being used in this case or any such like it. Firstly, the person suspected of planting the bomb is innocent before proven guilty in the eyes of the law. In a civilized society, there are trials before judges and our peers to determine culpability and innocence. Torturing the suspect before proving guilt is barbaric and against all values of a free nation. A solution that someone might say is that we can introduce warrants for torture in cases where time is of the essence. Putting this matter into a judge’s hands is absurd. The judge has his own biases and may be more prone to offer torture warrants dependent on race or even his stance on the issue of torture. Secondly, there is a probability that the suspect in custody is either not the real perpetrator and/or does not know anything substantial such as the bomb’s location. We cannot risk innocent civilians being tortured for something they have not done. We cannot have a free society when people are subject to torture on a whim. Thirdly, I believe that detectives should be trained enough to gather information in other manners that mitigates
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary: Defusing The Ticking Bomb Scenarios
    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary: Defusing The Ticking Bomb Scenarios

    Association for the Prevention of Torture. “Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario.” Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. New York: Bedford St. Martin’s, 2011. 836-851. Print.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Heymann vs. Dershowitz
    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Heymann vs. Dershowitz

    As the professor mentions, the fear of being prosecuted for torturing a prisoner restrains the officials for now, but if there existed a warrant that justifies their actions, all the other legal, and moreover – humane methods such as wiretapping and emergency searches would be put aside. Once the circumstances are defined – we are sure there is an activated bomb, the suspect is aware of where it is, there is no chance to get it moved in the meantime and so on, the torture would become the ordinary practice.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compaire and Contrast of Torture
    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compaire and Contrast of Torture

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Torture
    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Torture

    If torture is used in retaliation and as an “eye to eye” concept, then torture would be an unethical way of punishing someone (Guidebook). For this example, I would argue that torture is being used to provide the members with the realization for their actions, so torture is an unethical way of punishment. Also, torture is not a replacement for the death penalty, so it is not saving an individual’s life because in the guidebook it states that if “torture is vengeful and not being used to protect innocent lives, then it is not technically a moral reason for punishing someone” (Guidebook). Without protecting innocent lives, torture cannot be considered an ethical reason for punishing someone, so I would argue that the type of punishment that should be used is an elongated amount of jail time. Incarceration meets all the requirements for being a moral type of punishment because it doesn't cause mental harm that torture would and incarcerating the members would not be a retaliating…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Torture: Laws of War and High Level- Terrorist
    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Torture: Laws of War and High Level- Terrorist

    In The Truth About Torture, Charles Krauthammer writes, “Torture is not always impermissible. However rare the cases, there are circumstances in which, by any rational moral calculus, torture not only would be permissible but would be required (to acquire life-saving information).” (309) Krauthammer discusses two scenarios where he believes torture should be permitted: “the ticking time bomb and the slower-fuse high level- terrorist”. (313) The ticking time bomb is a situation where hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent lives are at stake, with little to no time, all dependent on a crucial piece of information that can help mitigate the situation. The slower-fuse high level terrorist is when a person who is second-in-command of a terrorist cell is captured and has vital information that can bring down an entire enemy’s organization with one swift blow. In both of these scenarios, Krauthammer displays one common…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Permissibility of Torture
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Permissibility of Torture

    Henry Shue begins his article discussing torture with constraints which allows the victim to “surrender” and comply with the demands of the torturer. According to the Constraint of Possible Compliance (CPC), “the victim of torture must have available an act of compliance which, if performed, will end the torture” (Shue 427). With the aim of interrogational torture being to extract information from a person with holding it, this torture appears to satisfy the constraint of possible compliance, since it offers an escape, in the form of providing the information wanted by the torturers, which affords some protection against further assault. In practice there are evidently only a few pure cases of interrogational torture. For the most dominant type of torture that occurs today is considered to be terroristic. Terroristic torture is meant to put fear in not only the victim, but also all those who oppose that government. The victim’s suffering is being used as a means to end over which the victim has no control over.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture
    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tragedy In Torture

    Advocates of torture argue that torture is a necessary tool especially in time sensitive scenarios, like if an individual is the only person alive who knows the whereabouts of a bomb that is set to detonate, resulting in the deaths of hundreds. I could not even imagine how stressful the interview process of this scenario would be, as time progresses and no results are being produced, inflicting pain does not only have the possibility of yielding results but it would also be a convenient way to externalize your frustrations.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay: Should We Use Torture?
    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Persuasive Essay: Should We Use Torture?

    When it comes to the topic of torture, most of us will readily agree that torturing someone in order to get information is not the answer. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how guilty a person is, and what should be done in the case of a bombing. On the one hand, people argue that torture is unconstitutional and should not be practiced because it questions a person’s morality and what they are willing to do in order to get results. On the other hand, however, others argue that we should allow torture because it is more just than allowing thousands of innocents to die because we didn’t want to question a single person. I have mixed feelings on the topic. While I recognize that our actions may be for the greater good, we cannot allow ourselves to lose our morality because of it. I do not believe that a person should be tortured for information unless it is under specific circumstances. What I mean by this is that people should not torture someone unless that person is obviously guilty or it is…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated bibliography
    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Annotated bibliography

    Very brief summary: The article ‘Using torture is illegal and never justified’ argues against torture by mainly focusing on the fact that the information gained from torture is highly unreliable because the prisoner could be lying to get the torture to stop. Who makes the decisions is also called into question.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Con Torture
    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Con Torture

    In a post-9/11 world, where it seems that terrorism is rampant and increasing numbers of extremists threaten the safety and wellbeing of American citizens, is it ever justified to bend the rules of legality and morality while fighting the war on terror? Whether or not the use of torture as an interrogation tactic is justified in these circumstances is questionable because of controversy about its legality, morality, and effectiveness; the use of torture would violate several international and domestic laws as well as compromise American morals and beliefs. Despite this controversy, the United States has employed these tactics in recent years to questionable effect; however, the use of it is illegal, immoral and ineffective. Torture should not be used in any circumstance because it violates American morals, political treaties, and laws, would diminish the reputation of the United States in the world, has not been proven effective by scientific evidence, and would create a future of uncertainty regarding the use of torture.…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Torture

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Torture: Morality and Terrorist
    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torture: Morality and Terrorist

    In the article “The Truth about Torture”, Charles Krauthammer considers the ticking time bomb problem and argues that torture is sometimes not only morally permissible, but morally necessary. Krauthammer uses the example of terrorists in his example, what if we captured a terrorist with knowledge of an attack and the knowledge of future attacks; do we torture him for his information? Or simply just have him locked up? (Krauthammer 2). Utilitarian considerations are sufficient to justify using cruel actions against terrorists to extract confessions. Even though is cruel to torture one to extract information, it is our duty as citizens to maintain the happiness as a whole and do what is necessary to save lives.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong
    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    Torture has been a technique use by many nations in the world including the United States. Physically and psychologically damage captured people is what the government do when under attack. There were innocent victims along with attackers that got captured for terrorist and war interrogation. Terrorist attacks like September 11 are unpredictable and it then disturb every citizen’s everyday life. However, that should not be the reason to arrest suspects and torture them, sometimes to death, to get ahold of the true culprits.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Heartless Acts Of Torture
    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Examples Of Heartless Acts Of Torture

    To begin, torture causes extreme physical and mental pain. Suspected terrorists are tortured in many cruel ways. For example,¨Tactics included weeks of sleep deprivation, slapping and slamming of detainees against walls, confining them to small boxes, keeping them isolated for prolonged periods and threatening them with death¨ (Klapper and Dilanian). Isolating terrorists for prolonged periods of time and torturing them can make them more likely to be detrimental towards others and the world. Even though they are suspected terrorists, most of those people are victimized based on their background, and not based on accurate facts.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Torture Wrong
    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Torture Wrong

    We all have a general understanding of what torture is but do we ever think about whether torture morally right or wrong? Torture can be defined as, ‘‘the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions.” Under international law it is against the law to use torture in any situation no matter what. In this essay I will argue that torture is always morally wrong. I will prove this by observation of the time ticking scenario which will provide justification for torture in extravagant situations.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics