Preview

The Realtionship Between Death and Freedom in Sorrows of a Young Werther and Crime and Punishment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
887 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Realtionship Between Death and Freedom in Sorrows of a Young Werther and Crime and Punishment
The relationship between death and freedom is a common thread throughout Sorrows of a Young Werther by Goethe and Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky. The relationship illustrated in both works is that one cannot achieve true freedom until they are dead. Until death, Werther and Raskolnikov will always feel the restrictions that society places upon them. Werther feels restricted due to the unrequited love of Lotte and Raskolnikov feels restricted by the moral code that society establishes. In Sorrows of a Young Werther by Goethe and Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky both characters' exhibit their freedom through death.
In Sorrows of a Young Werther, Werther views suicide as a human right and the ultimate expression of one's power. Death representing freedom is evident in Weather's suicide because he feels that he cannot go on living in such torment. The only way to free him from this torment is to kill himself. In Crime and Punishment death representing freedom is evident in Raskolnikov's justification for the pawnbroker's murder. He justifies the murder first through it's circumstances. When Raskolnikov discovers that Lizaveta will be out of the house at seven, he views this information as a sign that the murder must be committed, "all liberty of action and free-will were gone." Next Raskolnikov claims that the pawnbroker deserved to die and it was his duty to rid society of "the wretched little creature". This mind set shows how murder is an expression of freedom for Raskolnikov because the murder is Raskolnikov's way of showing his superiority to society. Both Raskolnikov and Werther view themselves as superior to society. Raskolnikov views himself as the Napoleonic great man and Werther views himself as the romantic egoistic. Raskolnikov believes that laws, restrictions, and a moral code only apply to the ignorant and naïve common man. Raskolnikov is very confident that the police will never be able to convict him of murder because he can outwit the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One must die for another to live. The story mostly tasks place in a smelly catacomb, with dead bodies all over the place. Freedom becomes less and less of a possibility as they move farther and farther in to smaller crypts. In such confinement makes all readers and characters appreciate the fresh air.…

    • 281 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rift between Raskolnikov and the rest of society is introduced when he first describes his “extraordinary man” theory. Raskolnikov develops his theory during a specific time when he has isolated himself in his room to contemplate solutions to his life problems. Raskolnikov studies how other “great” men in history have solved their problems. He points out “that the majority of those benefactors and guiding spirits of mankind were particularly fearsome bloodletters” (309). Napoleon is specifically referenced. Raskolnikov believes that some men, like Napoleon, are “extraordinary,” or above the moral rules that govern the rest of society. As a result, “great” men, similar to Napoleon, are entitled to do as they please. As Raskolnikov considers committing murder, he justifies this behavior saying, “One death to a hundred lives…the old woman is harmful. She’s wearing another person’s life out” (80-1). Raskolnikov believes that he fits in this “extraordinary” category, therefore making it acceptable for him to murder Alyona, the common pawnbroker. He believes himself to be a “great” man, acting for a higher purpose beyond conventional moral law. This theory proves to be inaccurate, thus creating the breach between Raskolnikov and society’s views of acceptable moral behavior.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both characters reject ordinary standards and morals; good and evil are ambiguous, and they are pressured both socially and emotionally. “ … I am eking out my days in my corner, taunting myself with the bitter and entirely useless consolation that an intelligent man cannot seriously become anything; that only a fool can become something.” as indicated in this quote, the underground man believes that “an intelligent man” is incapable of becoming prominent. “Yes, sir, an intelligent nineteenth century man must be, is morally bound to be, an essentially characterless creature; and a man of character, a man of action-an essentially limited creature.”, the quote is an elaboration on the character’s previous statement; he defines “an intelligent man” that is contrary to the norm. Correspondingly, “‘The old woman was only an illness.... I was in a hurry to overstep.... I didn't kill a human being, but a principle!’”, as stated in the novel, Raskolnikov has a different moral perspective on humans too. Being a killer, to justify his actions, Raskolnikov considers his victim as “an illness” and “principle”; she was merely a human to him. They both possess distinct views on humans, contrasting the standard…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Guide Lesson 1

    • 5830 Words
    • 24 Pages

    When forced to live under such conditions where there is no sight of normality, one such as Raskolnikov may begin to believe that because they are different from most of the society, they are allowed to disobey the law by means of reaching their needs and wants.…

    • 5830 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rasconikov Duality

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rasconikov’s isolated, detached, sneaky and disconnected side is when most of his intellectual scheming goes on. There is never any spontaneous moves when in this state, but more so every action being premeditated. This side of his personality is where he strategizes his theories about crime and how to commit it. Raskolnikov believes that the “extraordinary” are able to be independent, and not influenced by others on the outside, but only being influenced by oneself, being self-sufficient without company or the hand of another, which explains why his intellectual side is very isolated.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime and Punishment was written right after Dostoyevsky’s imprisonment in Siberia. Before Dostoyevsky was sentenced to eight years in Siberia, he was a very radical thinker and flamboyantly expressed radical and liberal ideas, which went against the grain of the Russian government during that time. Russian officials were disgruntled by Dostoyevsky’s views, so they sentenced Dostoyevsky, and other people affiliated with him, to death. Right before the Russian officials raised their guns to murder him,…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Nobody, but he who has felt it, can conceive what a plaguing thing it is to have a man’s mind torn asunder by two projects of equal strength, both obstinately pulling in contrary direction at the time.” (Laurence Sterne) In Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, it is this exact miscalculation that leads the protagonist Raskolnikov (Rodya) to his ultimate mental, physical and social demise. Similarly, the theme of the novel directly correlates to Sterne’s quote, as Dostoyevsky delves into the psychology of a criminal, centering the novel on a murder and its after-affects on the transgressor.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Raskolinikov is able to forgive himself easier once he has the time to reflect and serve his punishment. After committing the crime Raskolinikov eventually accepts that he must suffer the consequences, by law or by his own mental prowess; "If he has a conscience he will suffer for his mistake. That will be punishment - as well as the prison" (Dostoyevsky 230). The human brain dictates that all actions should have either a logical or emotional purpose, Raskolinikov struggles to find a good enough reason and his mind endures the penalty, until he is properly punished and serves out his sentence in Siberia with a quiet mind and a happy ending with Sonya to look forward…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facing Mortality

    • 2565 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In this paper I have been asked to compare and contrast literary works involving the topic of my choosing. For this paper I chose the topic of death. Death can be told in many different ways, and looked at the same. This paper is going to decide how you feel about death, is it a lonely long road that ends in sorrow, or a happy journey that ends at the heart of the soul? You decide as we take different literary works to determine which way you may feel.…

    • 2565 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the characters in Crime and Punishment were consumed by opposing feelings; they faced inner confusion. Dunya didn't know whether to choose Luzhin or her brother. Pulcheria Alexanrovna didn't know what side to assert herself on in the aforementioned situation. Sonya was torn between her best interests or that of her step-siblings and Luzhin couldn't decide whether to put aside his pride and apologize to Dunya, or stand tall like an erect peacock. The character that faced the utmost inner turmoil was Raskolnikov. His conscious told him to confess the murder, while his heart was unsure if he was ready to give himself up. Raskolnikov's indecisiveness and guilt caused him illness: paranoia, depression, and slight delirium. They became his character. Rodya's ambiguity about his actions after he killed Alyona Ivanovna and her sister, Lizaveta, was what made his character so alluring and intriguing.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Dostoyevsky’s novel Crime and Punishment the main character plots and carries out the murder of an old woman who has a considerable amount of money in her apartment. After killing the old women, he steals her money and argues that she was a malicious women; useless to society and herself. He goes on to state that the old women’s life causes no happiness to her or to others. For the old women’s money; the main character argues that if found after her death, the money would only fall into the hands of chisellers anyway, whereas he would use it to pay for his education. In terms of main stream society, Dostoyevsky’s main characters’ action more likely than not wouldn’t be proven ethically justifiable, but according to the moral standard of Utilitarianism the reason behind the main characters plot can be justifiable whereas the concept of Wickedness purposed by Stanley Ben clearly states the main character actions where evil and unethical.…

    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Raskolnikov believes that “ordinary” people’s purpose is to just exist, in order to form the world and the society. The second group is those who are “extraordinary” and a step above those who are simply ordinary. Raskolnikov cites such “extraordinary men” as Newton, Mahomet, and Napoleon. He tells us that Newton had the right to kill hundreds of men in order to bring to the world knowledge of his findings and to create a new world. They overturned laws and created new ones. They had the right to uphold their new ideals, even if it meant killing innocent men. Therefore Raskolnikov believes that some “extraordinary” humans like him have the right to oppose ordinary social laws in order to create a new social order. Raskolnikov believed that “the first preserve and world and people it, the second move the world and lead it to its goal” (Dostoevsky 227). Raskolnikov also believes that both classes have an equal right to exist. Without “extraordinary” people the human race would be stuck and without the “ordinary” men the efforts and ideas of “extraordinary” men would be nonexistent.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although it’s hard to know what he was like before the novel started, it can be inferred that he wasn’t always insane. Poverty and anger drove a man who used to be a hardworking university student to commit a murder and lose his sanity. From the opening of the book, his paranoia is evident. Raskolnikov seemed to have no other objective besides worrying about the thoughts of others. This paranoia is part of what makes him so impulsive. In many parts of the book, he allows his insanity to think for him. Raskolnikov’s dreams and hallucinations come after the paranoia and impulsiveness. They truly show how alone he is. The real-life connection between sanity and interaction with people is evident in Crime and Punishment. As Raskolnikov begins to talk to people again, his mental state gets better. His mind is at its worst when he is alone. If Raskolnikov had friends to rely on from the beginning, Crime and Punishment might have been a very different…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime and Punishment

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At the end of Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov confessed to the murder and was imprisoned in Siberia for eight years. Sonia followed him as "link" between the family. Rodya felt that the conditions of his life in prison were not bad although the other prisoners didn't like him. He also felt that he had to "submit to the idiocy of a sentence" because he saw his crime as a "blunder" because it could happen to anyone. (pg 535) His imprisonment in Siberia was the real punishment he had to face for his crime.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays