B. Thesis: The Red River Rebellion did lead to the Canadian government recognizing some of the Metis rights, but not to the full extent
C. Evidence:
POV#1: Ignorance of Metis rights and fear of the loss of the Metis culture built up towards the Rebellion
Source#1:Bumstead, James. "Red River Rebellion." The Canadian Encyclopedia. The Canadian Encyclopedia, 03 Apr. 2015. Web. 24 May 2016.
-also mention that a French-speakers and half-natives, the Metis felt that they were not being treated as well as the English-speaking white people. Their needs were not being as respected.
-Metis did not have …show more content…
Not necessarily against joining the country, but feel they should have the choice.
-Metis needed assurance that both their culture and language will be protected by the government
-Red River residents not informed of negotiations between the Canadian Government and the HBC
-Prime Minister Sir John A. Macdonald wrote, “the present residents will be altogether swamped by the influx of strangers who will go in with the idea of becoming industrious and peaceable settlers.”
-Metis turn to young Louis Riel, who thought that the Metis must force the Canadian Government to negotiate with them
-Riel belives that to achieve what he wants, the Red River residents must block McDougall from entering the area
-Neither the Governor William Mcdougall or his councillors did not have any long term connections with the Red River area
-Red River Militia blocks Willian McDougall from entering Metis Territory
POV#3:The Red River Rebellion contributed to the establishment of Manitoba, but did not enhance the Metis rights as much.
-how did the Red River Rebellion make all of this happen?
-what were the various things that the Metis wanted but did not