Preview

The Right To A Trial By Jury Trial

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
900 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Right To A Trial By Jury Trial
Freedom stands for something greater than just the right to act of how Americans choose. The right to a trial by jury is to give two americans their right to procrastinate against each other about what really happened in their situation they were in. Judges wouldn't know who did the crime if both defendants had no physical or visual evidence of what really happened at the scene. A trial by jury is really based on the amount of evidence and points you've proved to the judge about the case. The most concerned day of our lives today is walking through the doors to a trial by jury, because you may never know who's staying free and who's paying the time.
Today humans are prosecuted everyday for something that was in the past and now they have to follow up on it in the present day. This is caused by picking the right date to do the trial on. However this is
…show more content…
The right was expanded with the 5th, 6th and 7th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states “In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed” as Albert W. Alschuler says in his article “Jury Trial”. People get accused of things on a daily basis, but that doesn't mean they go straight to jail just because they got accused of doing something they don't admit to. That is why everyone relies on this VI Amendment. In a trial by jury there are two defendants one accused guilty and one is the person who was being harassed at the scene. Once someone gets accused of stealing, or being at a scene at the wrong time then they go to the judge and say that they want to plead either guilty or not guilty.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The right to a fair trial. Where does it come from? The 6th Amendment. Which category of defendants were the first to be given this right when accused of a crime by a state? Anyone charged with a capital offense (must be provided an attorney) Which category came next? Anyone charged with a felony (must be provided an attorney) Which criminal defendants still do not have this right? If he or she is not sentenced to actual imprisonment and could not have been sentenced for more than one year.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    •any free man who was brought to trial for a crime had the right to be judged by his equals, rather than the king or his officials; this is what we know as a jury…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Basically means that the jury cannot be biased to the accused. If you had people on the jury who disliked you or immediately judge you, then most likely you are going to jail. The second part of this is, you can’t have someone who has been involved with the same crime. For example if a mother who is on the jury lost a son to a hit and run, and you’ve be accused of a hit and run, it would have already been biased. The trail must be held in the area the crime took place, or it wouldn’t be fair to the accused.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights also protected the right to trial by jury in civil cases. This guarantees the right to trial by jury in civil cases in federal courts in the seventh amendment. This amendment was added by one of our Founding Father James Madison. This amendment makes sure that your case is heard by a jury. This amendment helps when someone is trying to sue somebody, they have the right to have a federal jury hear both sides of the story.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The amendment guarantees a “speedy and public” trial with a jury. Defendants are also given the right to be represented by a lawyer, question witnesses, and know if charges are being made against them.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S Constitutional amendments place limits on what law enforcement and how a trial should be governed. These strict rights are to be followed because if an officer fails to abide by the proper procedure, the trial court may forcibly put an end to evidence obtained in violation of proper procedure or even release the arrested suspect. This is an amendment that deals with each of the following: criminal due process, arrest, interrogation, search and seizure, Miranda, punishment, the right to jury trials, and the right to counsel.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 5th Amendment states that the government must follow the due process of the law before punishing a person and that all citizens had the right to a trial by jury. It also states that a person cannot be put on trial twice for the same crime or that person on trial for a crime does not have to testify against themselves in court - "Pleading the 5th". The reason for this addition to the Constitution was due to the British refusing to grant the same rights to American subjects as they gave to people in Great Britain. Many people were jailed without even being accused of a crime. This specifically referred to the right of a Trial by Jury and the right not incriminate themselves. The 5th Amendment is also referred to as the Double Jeopardy and…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will provide an analysis of a jury trial; my analysis will focus on the right of the defendant. I will articulate how a defendant 's rights at trial can be assured when it comes to The defendant’s right to a speedy trial, the defendant’s right to an impartial judge and the defendant’s right to an impartial jury.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Trial Research Paper

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The advantage of having a trial by jury allows a sort of "second trial." For example, in the movie Twelve Angry Men, every single jury member voted guilty, except for one. The other eleven men demanded his reasons for voting Not Guilty, and he gave them. In the end, they voted Not Guilty unanimously. Now, the defendant in question was charged with murder, to which the penalty was death by electrocution. However, the evidence, which most of the jury members did not question, was not as sound as they thought, and the man that voted Not guilty showed them that. If the defendant hadn't had a jury, then he would have been sentenced to death, whether he was guilty or not, due to the meager and circumstantial evidence…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freedom is the state that you have power to act, speak and choose whatever you want. Everyone have the dream about being free and live without force in their lives, and also people have their rights to live without flexibility. Freedom is an essential act in people’s life because people who have not rights to speak or act are like a bird in a cage. People need freedom for choosing what they want to do, saying their ideas, and voting.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The many documents that became the foundation of American “freedom” support the idea that America is free. One of the most well known lines of the Declaration of Independence claims we have the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. The first point is the simplest. We have the right to be alive,…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Trial By Jury

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Right to Trial by Jury is where the accused has the right to a public trial, lawyer, to know who the accusers are, what you are accused for, and a jury. The statement that has been said was that this Right should be changed by “Trial By Justices”. Trial By Justices means that cases are decided by the decisions of Judicial Officials.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6th Amendment guarantees you a speedy trail, an impartial jury, that the accused can comfort the witnesses against them, and must be allowed a…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Rights

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Criminals have legal rights during trial procedures. Without these rights there would be so much confusion and controversy in the court system today. There are four of them that I will give a brief summarization of and explain to you the consequences that could possibly happen if these legal rights were no longer upheld in the court system today. They are; the right to confront witnesses, the right to an impartial jury, the right to counsel at trial, and last but not least the right to be competent trial.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays