Preview

The Role Of Dietary Change In Neanderthals

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1892 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role Of Dietary Change In Neanderthals
Niche construction theory is defined as, “The building and destroying of niches by organisms and the mutual interactions between organisms and environments.” The overall construction behind this theory is that organisms inherit the ecologies that they are born into. For example, the building of a city changes the overall ecology. Therefore, children that are born into these environments inherit ecological changes that come along with it. Some of these changes include the amount of people they are exposed to and the types of foods that they eat. A prime example of human based niche construction is dietary change, which has changed drastically in the last 40,000 years, a time when Neanderthals roamed the Earth. Directly related to dietary change …show more content…
Once humans learned how to make smaller, more powerful tools, they were then able to widen their food choices. They were at this point able to hunt not only land creatures, but sea creatures as well. These stronger tools enabled humans to chop up their food, and along with the power to cook their food through the use of fire, the food was overall easier to digest. This was one of the ways in which humans began to use social, as well as behavioral materials, to deal with external …show more content…
The increase in the use of lactose production has aided in increase of lactose tolerant humans, yet not to the extent that we would think. There is only on average about 30-40% of humans with the lactose tolerant gene, which has taken about 40,000 years to be able to accumulate. These regions are reflected on not only the higher populated areas, but also areas in which there has been a longer time span of human population and growth. Other key elements that are involved with this trend dive into cultural connections, and the use of milk or those animals as a agricultural use. The change is evident in the amount of humans with this allele mutation. It’s a mutation over an expansion of time that is from a source that we not only don’t need, but shouldn’t be using, since it’s from another animal. There are clearly many benefits shown from the drinking of milk and the use of lactose included products, but the majority of the population lacks this mutation, and it’s a question of whether we really need this product to continue to survive, or if it’s just a luxury. The production of milk is highly prevalent, so there is no knowing the influence of the majority to put a halt to these productions based on popular

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Dingo Bone Structure

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Environmental Niche:The niches are all the same because the species’ ”roles” are all the same. They all hunt for their food (scavengers), and they are all tertiary consumers in a food chain or food web. They however, do not have the same environment that all of the different species live in. They all live in different areas.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some food came from the mutation of other crops, domesticating animals allowed a group of people to quit moving around to gather crops and hunt because they had everything they need right there…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 54

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animals that have the same niche will end up competing for the niche because the competitive exclusion…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Answer 3: Humans all over the world had been nomadic hunters for almost 2 million years. During this time physical and cultural developments allowed humans to form communities. In these communities people gradually learned to manipulate nature in favor of their survival. Humans learned to farm and domesticate animals. The animals and cops differed from area to area based on the climate of the region and the needs of the people.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to this, humans are regarded to be full omnivores, since the split from the great ape line more than 6 million years ago. The introduction of protein to our diet allowed us to develop a larger brain. This is the basic success of the human race.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers lived in areas that was rich of resources and consumed a significant amount of meat. Today’s technology reveals that early modern Homo sapiens were clever and excellent hunters. Not only did they make tools, but they developed weapons with long, narrow blades (known as harpoons) used for hunting. They became great spear throwers with good accuracy. The weapons helped the Upper Paleolithic protect themselves as well as help from any harm during their hunting trips. Vast amount of animal bones, both large and small, were found at the bottom of high cliffs. This indicated that hunters not only used their weapon to kill, but use their weapons as aid by stampeding the animals off the cliffs. This would allow other hunters to wait and butcher the dead animals at the bottom of the cliff.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No other ancient people have aroused more controversy and confusion over the last century and a half than have the Neanderthals (3,4). There is an on-going debate as to whether they should be considered Homo sapiens. While the idea that modern humans originated in Africa and spread out to other parts of the world is widely accepted, several scenarios have been proposed to account for the replacement of neanderthal populations. The multi regional hypothesis holds that neanderthal populations in Eurasia and Africa were held together by gene flow. Fossil and genetic evidence supports an African origin for Modern Humans (1,3,5,9,10).…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Paleolithic vs. Neolithic

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Specialization can be defined as “a structural adaptation of a body part to a particular function or of an organism for life in a particular environment” (Merriam-Webster). The hunter-gatherers of the Paleolithic culture were prepared, sometimes at a moment’s notice, to pick up and evacuate their current living areas in order to migrate to an environment in which their living conditions would be greatly improved. Such conditions included better climates, and most importantly, more suitable land to live off of. The scarcity of food was a major problem at the time. The hunter-gatherers of the Paleolithic society were tasked with solving this prevalent issue and they did so with the strategic use of tools and stone. Such tools include the common hand axe, chisel, the arrow and spearhead, and the grinder (“Early Humans”). Tools such as these enabled them to acquire larger quantities of food and necessities for a longer, and ultimately, a more healthful life.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overtime, as populations of these early humans grew, they began to grow a surplus of food. This could be stored away for hard times or it could be used to trade with each other. This also started division of labor. People began specializing in certain things instead of all doing the same task. Surplus of food also gave…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prehistoric humans had many choices as to how they would obtain food. Although all humans in the past started as hunter-gatherers, some evolved into farmers. The first farmers were unaware of their actions. They could not have possibly known that they developed food production as they were the first to do so. The decision to change from hunter-gatherers to farmers did not occur simultaneously. Many hunter-gatherers choose to not change their lifestyle. The change occurred gradually and was influenced by factors such as availability of new technologies and the increase in domesticable plants and animals also played a part in converting to a secondary society. The development of food production could not occur as late as 28,000 BC due to the…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human existence has lasted over several million years and in that time there has been countless advances in the way we live. Human history has had many diverse periods of time, one being the Stone Age. During the Stone Age there were two major subdivisions, the Paleolithic and Neolithic periods. The Paleolithic, which lasted until about 10,000 years ago, had a significant separating factor from the Neolithic, ending in 2000 B.C.E. This factor was the way in which the people in these periods acquired food. The Paleolithic people hunted and gathered their food while the Neolithic people produced their own food by agriculture. These two different styles of obtaining food greatly affected the lifestyles of each period’s people. The political, economical, and social lives of the two periods differed from each other. From a political view both periods did not have a very advanced political system, only organized by small to groups involving kinship. The Neolithic age had a more advanced economical system including trade and agriculture along with specialized farming tools. On the other hand the Paleolithic people hunted and gathered their food with simple stone tools with no trade. The foragers had more of a social life being gathers and hunters, allowing time for art and toolmaking. The Neolithic farmers had less social time than the foragers, spending it making tools, building structures and creating containers for the harvest. They both had individualized jobs for the males and females of the communities.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the birth of the human race, the consumption of milk has been a popular nutrient. Currently, cow’s milk is considered the most consumed in the entire United States. However, contrary to popular belief, cow’s milk is not a viable source to drink from. Although it may contain many vital ingredients that living organisms need to survive, it is riddled with hormones, antibiotics, pus, and even blood. Cow’s milk is not intended for the consumption of humans; cow’s milk is for cows. The milk from cows is also believed to directly influence the creation of cancer cells.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Do People Drink Milk?

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A shocked fact about milk for most people, as it turns out that consuming much milk is not good for people's health as they think. Milk has many beneficial components that make people drink it every day in order to be healthy. Vitamin D and calcium are the most known components on milk. Even if asking a kid why he is drinking milk every day, his response directly would be because it has calcium which helps strengthen bones. Moreover, milk provides really useful nutritious other than vitamin D and calcium. It also provides fat, carbohydrates, and protein. These are really important components for the body’s health. However, even though milk has these useful components for human needs, it actually has an opposite effect on human’s bodies. The following…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lactose Intolerance

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lactose Intolerance is a condition that effects one out of every ten Americans. There are many causes of Lactose Intolerance, which are all based on the amount of lactase the small intestine produces. There are many symptoms that come along with being Lactose Intolerant. Lactose is found in dairy products ("Lactose Intolerance Symptoms, Causes, Treatments, Tests").…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of the Paleolithic Age were mostly nomads. To survive they had to travel everywhere, and follow the migration of animals; as the animals were there primary food source. Whenever they decided to stay, they lived mostly in caves, tree trunks, and those types of shelter. They had to eat, and to do that they had to kill the animals. They did this by using tools as weapons. The tools were mainly stone, bone, and ivory. They could make the weapons into hatchets, knives, and spearheads. The use of tools is one important development that took place in this time period.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays