The participants were told to reply by pressing “Z” or “M” to choose either a fear-relevant stimulus (snake) or a fear- irrelevant stimulus (salamander). The response bias was measured using SDT. The SDT paradigm measured a false alarm when participants chose a snake when a salamander appeared on the screen, and a miss transpired if a participant chose a salamander when a snake was displayed on the screen. In experiment one, Stirling, Greskovich, and Johnson hypothesized that the individuals would illustrate a bias response toward the fear-relevant stimuli. In experiment two, a similar scheme was conducted using different participants. The new participants were exposed to a photos with noisy stimuli as well as the standard stimuli. The noisy stimuli represented the environmental aspects in the images such as tall grass. For the second experiment, the authors hypothesized that the noisy stimuli would cause greater response bias than standard stimuli since uncertainty was
The participants were told to reply by pressing “Z” or “M” to choose either a fear-relevant stimulus (snake) or a fear- irrelevant stimulus (salamander). The response bias was measured using SDT. The SDT paradigm measured a false alarm when participants chose a snake when a salamander appeared on the screen, and a miss transpired if a participant chose a salamander when a snake was displayed on the screen. In experiment one, Stirling, Greskovich, and Johnson hypothesized that the individuals would illustrate a bias response toward the fear-relevant stimuli. In experiment two, a similar scheme was conducted using different participants. The new participants were exposed to a photos with noisy stimuli as well as the standard stimuli. The noisy stimuli represented the environmental aspects in the images such as tall grass. For the second experiment, the authors hypothesized that the noisy stimuli would cause greater response bias than standard stimuli since uncertainty was