Preview

The Scopes Monkey Trial Research Paper

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1328 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Scopes Monkey Trial Research Paper
The Scopes Trial
Today evolution is taught in public schools in America, but it has not always been that way. The legal battle that led to the teaching of evolution in public schools has been a very long one. Creationism was taught in public schools until the late 19th century. Following Darwin’s theories being introduced in 1859 many began to accept evolution during the 1860’s. This would continue in America until a flamboyant, Christian, lawyer named William Jennings Bryan campaigned against the teaching of evolution. Bryan found supporters very easily because of a grassroots movement in America following World War I; which was a vast change in society that led people towards a simpler and more religious lifestyle. This movement led several states to create laws banning the teaching of evolution in public schools. Bryan and his movement was of course opposed by many which led to the legal battles that have taken America from a non-evolution teaching society to the evolution teaching society it is today. In this paper I will discuss the first major court case that brought significant national attention to these laws. The first major court case that brought significant attention to the laws banning the teaching of evolution in public schools is “The Scopes Trial” or “The Monkey Trial” in

Dayton, TN in 1925. This trial was the State of Tennessee vs John Thomas Scopes, who was a high school football coach that was also a substitute. Although this case would turn out to be more about Scopes breaking a law than the teaching of evolution in public schools; it was significant in bringing national attention to the laws. After the state of Tennessee passed the Butler Act, which banned the teaching of anything that contradicted the idea of creationism from the Bible, there was a group of businessmen from Dayton, TN who felt they could bring business and attention to their small town thanks to the new law. They devised a plan to find a local teacher willing to



Cited: Crewe, Sabrina and Michael V. Uschan. The Scopes "Monkey" Trial. Milwaukee: Gareth Stevens Publishing, 2005. Print. Groce, Eric, Tina L. Heafner and Katherine A. O 'Connor. "Monkey Business: Teaching the Scopes Evolution Trial." Social Studies Research & Practice (2011): 107-128. Print. Lovorn, Michael G. "Monkey Town: The Summer of the Scopes Trial." Social Studies Research & Practice (2009): 99-106. Print. Singham, Mano. God vs. Darwin. Plymouth: Roman and Littlefield Education, 2009. Book.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Scopes was a teacher in Tennessee who became famous for going on trial for teaching evolution. Scopes was part of an American Civil Liberties Union attempt to challenge a state law prohibiting the teaching of evolution. Scopes trial became a national sensation. Scopes was found guilty, but his story remains famous as the Scopes "Monkey Trial," dramatized in the 1960 film Inherit the Wind.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier is a very interesting case because it requires the courts to balance two very important values of American society, freedom of speech and education. Many Americans have made countless sacrifices to ensure that we can enjoy both freedom of speech and one of the best education systems in the world. Due to the fact that these values are so important to the American people, it is no surprise that the decision had to be ultimately made by the Supreme Court of the United States. It is also not surprising that due to the nature of the case, the Appeals Court had a different decision than both the District Court of Missouri and the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Although I find merit in the dissenting…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - The crime the defendant (Bert Cates) in the play is charged with teaching the theory of evolution…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scopes Trial Dbq Analysis

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Scopes Trial is often referred to as pitting science against Christianity. However, that is far from the truth, despite the often reworded “make the distinction between theology and science,” (Document E). The Theory of Evolution presented was not portrayed accurately, and the “monkey business” in Dayton…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The focus of creationism versus evolution in the Scopes Monkey Trial shifts in its fictional representation written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. Inherit the Wind uses the Scopes Trial as a backdrop to project society into a town called Hillsboro. The singular perspective of this small town hinders its people’s freedom of thought and the town’s progress as a part of society.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scope Trial Simulation.

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We the defense, believe our client is innocent. Why you might ask, becuase no law was ever broken.According to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion and what does this The Butler Act do? It outlawed in state-funded schools, including universities, the teaching of "any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible." So John T. Scope never broke a law. The one who should be here instead is Austin Peay for signing a piece of state legislation that was violating the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The first amedment granted freedom of expression giving Scopes the right to teach evolution and also granted freedom of religion giving Scopes the right to believe in anything he wants. The state requires teachers to use a textbook, Hunter's Civic Biology, which explicitly describes and endorses the theory of evolution, and that teachers were therefore effectively requires Scope to break the law.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result, on July 1st 1925, one of the best lawyers in the country sat down in Criminal Court of Tennessee. On one hand, William Jennings Bryan, three-time presidential candidate, argued for the prosecution. The narrow legal argument offered by the prosecution was that Scopes’ guilt was a matter of incontestable fact and logic: The state had outlawed the teaching of evolution, Scopes admitted publicly that he had taught evolution, therefore Scopes was guilty. Also, after the World War I., Bryan proposed that the Darwinism (he, actually, meant Social Darwinism) was behind excessive militarism and imperialism, which were one of the sins of Bryan’s political theology. Lastly, Bryan did not possess any sympathy for the evolution as he stated:…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Scopes Trial Essay

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Born in Kentucky in 1900, John Scopes was a science teacher in Tennessee. He became famous for going on trial for teaching evolution in 1925. Scopes was part of an American Civil Liberties Union attempt to challenge the state law that prohibited the teaching of evolution.He served as the defendant in the case. Scopes's trial was a national sensation. Especially with celebrity lawyers Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan involved in the case.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scopes Trial Essay Example

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Scopes Trial was the Tennessee legal case involving the teaching of evolution in public schools. A statute was passed (Mar., 1925) in Tennessee that prohibited the teaching in public schools of theories contrary to accepted interpretation of the biblical account of human creation. John T. Scopes, a biology teacher, was tried (July, 1925) for teaching Darwinism in a Dayton, Tenn., public school. Clarence Darrow was one of Scopes's attorneys. Darrow argued that academic freedom was being violated and claimed that the legislature had indicated a religious preference, violating the separation of church and state. He also maintained that the evolutionary theory was consistent with certain interpretations of the Bible, and in an especially dramatic session he sharply questioned Bryan on the latter's literal interpretation. Scopes was convicted, partly because of the defense, which refused to plead any of the technical defenses available, fearing an acquittal on a technical rather than a constitutional basis. Scopes was, however, later released by the state supreme court on a technicality. Although the outcry over the case tended to discourage enactment of similar legislation in other states, the law was not repealed until 1967. William Jennings Bryan, three-time Democratic candidate for President and a populist, led a Fundamentalist crusade to banish Darwin's theory of evolution from American classrooms. Bryan's motivation for mounting the crusade is unclear. It is possible that Bryan, who cared deeply about equality, worried that Darwin's theories were being used by supporters of a growing eugenics movement that was advocating sterilization of "inferior stock." More likely, the Great Commoner came to his cause both out a concern that the teaching of evolution would undermine traditional values he had long supported and because he had a compelling desire to remain in the public spotlight--a spotlight he had occupied since his famous "Cross of Gold" speech at the…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jennings-Bryan was the seemingly perfect candidate for the fundamentalist lawyer, as his devout faith and good political campaigns gave him the nickname “The Great Commoner”. This case would become the capstone of his very prestigious career, and serve as a structural backbone for his previous views on evolution which were illustrated by his participation in the World Christian Fundamentals Association, and having quotes such as “the (evolution) most paralyzing influence with which civilizations has had to deal with in the last century,… promulgated a philosophy that condemned democracy,… denounced christianity,… denied the existence of god, overturned all concepts of morality,... and endeavored to substitute the worship of the superhuman for the worship of Jehovah.” which he told the World Brotherhood Congress. The evidence was clear that Jennings-Bryan was obviously a devout Christian, and a complete opponent to the theory of evolution and anything it stood…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In loco parentis v

    • 262 Words
    • 1 Page

    1. Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education (1961) – Students were now granted at least “due process”…

    • 262 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clarence Darrow

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There were people who believed in teaching evolution and on the opposite side were anti-evolution. The case was about Scopes, but Scopes played a little part in the trial, the trial basically turned into a circus. Darrow was questioning Bryan on his beliefs.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    More often than not challengers wish to protect certain demographics from exposure of particular concepts, for fear of that demographic adopting the concept. This is most clearly seen through parents challenging books which contain some of the aforementioned topics, such as the occult or sex education, with the goal of sheltering their children. However, with the freedom of information set into the United States’ constitution comes a freedom to learn that information. This was the topic of a Supreme Court case in 1982, on which Justice William Brennan “reasoned that the First Amendment right to express ideas must be supported by an implied right to receive information and ideas”, affirming indirectly the impropriety of book banning (Mullally,…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scopes Code

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1925 John Scopes challenged the Tennessee school system and the law when he decided to continue to teach Darwin’s theory of evolution although it had been banned to teach since it had went against thing written in the bible. This drew the attention of two men Clarence Darrow and William Jennings. Jennings stated that the theory of evolution isn’t fact and made students doubt their Christian faith while Darrow argued that the children should have intellectual and religious freedom. In this paper I will be arguing against Mr. Jennings because it is true that the children should have the right to learn about evolution or practise their religion as they wish.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After John Scopes is charged with teaching from Darwin's Origin of Species, Clarence Darrow takes his case.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays