Preview

The Significance of the Lemon Law Act

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1373 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Significance of the Lemon Law Act
It happens many times. A person finds the car of their dreams. They drive it around for a few weeks when it happens. The car will not start, it makes a funny noise, or the breaks just will not do anything while stepping onto the pedal. Does the person have to pay for the repairs all by themselves? And if so, what happens when the exact same problem happens more than 3 times? It is just not fair to pay all this money on your brand new affordable car. But, one should not worry. There is a solution to all these annoying questions one just does not know how to answer. This is how the Magnuson –Moss warranty act comes into this situation. The "lemon law" is a subdivision of this act. The Magnuson-Moss warranty act, when tied with the ‘lemon law, ' helps a person of the purchased new car, ensure that they will have the rights to have a properly functioning car. The following will explain what exactly this law is and how it is applied to the state of Nebraska.
What exactly is the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act? Cartalk explained that the act can be defined as the following. For any product that has a written warranty, if the product or any part thereof contains a defect after reasonable number of attempts, by the warrantor to repair the defect, the warrantor must either provide a refund for or replacement of the product. Autopedia explained that this is applied to any product that one can buy that does not perform, as it should. They went on to say that the magnuson-moss federal law protects the buyer of any product that costs more than $25 and comes with an express written warranty. This law can be incorporated with cars very easily. When the magnuson-moss warranty act and the lemon law tie together, the results greatly effect the rights of a car buyer. This statement was expressed both by Autopedia and Cartalk. This law guarantees a car buyer that a certain minimum requirements of warranties must be met, and provides for disclaimer of warranties before purchase, told


Bibliography: 1. Siegal,Nina. Putting the squeeze on lemon dealers. Regulating the sale of defective automobiles. Vol.62, The Progressive, 2-01-1998, pp36. 2. Author Unknown. Keep Good records if you think that car 's a lemon., The Arizona Republic, 07-31-1999, ppB5. 3.Michael Ferry; Legal Services of Eastern Missouri, Some help when buying cars., St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 04-22-1995, pp07D 4. WWW.Cartalk.com 5. WWW.Autopedia.com
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lemon Law
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lemon Law

    The California Lemon Law Group, Inc., is a law firm dedicated to the enforcement of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, popularly known as the California Lemon Law, to protect the rights of California’s consumers. The California Lemon Law Group, Inc., has offices located throughout the state of California and represents consumers statewide. The California Lemon Law attorney who founded this law firm has extensive experience with the California Lemon Law and she is considered to be a specialist in the field.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Defense Case Study
    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Defense Case Study

    Sarah is suing ACME for implied warranty of merchantability and negligence, claiming that ACME should have installed the safety back up alarm because they should know about the reverse probability for the truck and the visual allowance. The Plaintiff asserts that Keefer Motors is in breach of duty and failure of warranty of merchantability by failing to warn the City of Albany of the necessity of installing a back-up alarm by failure of inspecting the vehicle prior to selling it to the city. The Plaintiff also claims Keefer Motors knew the intended use of the truck by City of Albany. Additionally, the Plaintiff claims that Susan’s Truck Equipment should be held accountable for breach of implied warranty of fitness because upon altering the truck for a dump bed and hoist they too should have seen the need for a warning system. The Plaintiff further declares that the truck was in defective condition by being unreasonably…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Sinclair and Dante: Packingtown, Chicago and the Nine Circles of Hell
    • 2573 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Sinclair and Dante: Packingtown, Chicago and the Nine Circles of Hell

    "grafters." West 's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. 2008. The Gale Group 9 Feb. 2012.…

    • 2573 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lemon Law
    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lemon Law

    North Carolina’s lemon law requires automobile manufacturers to repurchase or replace a vehicle that has not been properly repaired within a "reasonable number of attempts". In North Carolina, this reasonable number is 4 attempts or if the car has been out of service waiting repair for a cumulative total of 20 or more business days during any 12-month period of the warranty. The North Carolina Lemon Law gives relief to those who either buy or lease a vehicle that has a gross weight of 10,000 pounds or less. It covers cars, trucks, motorcycles and most vans. It does not cover, however, house trailers. The North Carolina Lemon Law covers any kinds of defects that impair the value, use or safety of the vehicle to the consumer. The defects does not have to affect the drivability of the car but could be problems such as defective paint, heating system or excessive noise.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    9 2 work file 1 rs
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    9 2 work file 1 rs

    3. The Lemon Law says that the   is responsible for taking care of the defects.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6.02 LMS: Consumers Turn Right-Work File
    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6.02 LMS: Consumers Turn Right-Work File

    3. The Lemon Law says that the manufacturer is responsible for taking care of the defects.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Law: Answers to Essay Questions: Chapter 8
    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Law: Answers to Essay Questions: Chapter 8

    The rule applies to sellers liable for defective products due to a flaw in he manufacturer, or due to a design defect failure to warn.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cash For Clunkers
    • 1066 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cash For Clunkers

    The government tries to implement programs to assist individuals in living a better life. In 2009 a program called Cash for Clunkers or CARS (Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act) was created to help get older cars off of the road. This program allowed individuals to voluntarily trade in and purchase vehicles under this act. This program helps consumers pay for a new, more fuel efficient vehicles from participating dealers when they trade in less fuel efficient cars or trucks. Under the CARS Act a process was established in which dealers had to register in order to participate in the program. By having dealers register for this program it helped to create standards that the Department of Transportation used to determine which disposal resources were eligible to receive and destroy the trade-in vehicles. The program also sets the standards that trade-in vehicles and new vehicles must meet in order for purchases to qualify for assistance under this program. It also helped to maintain a set of rules and procedures that were required to be followed by consumers, dealers, disposal facilities and others. Lastly, the rules and requirements that were set-up by DOT present enforcement procedures and provisions for punishing fraud and other violations of the program requirements. The CARS program was a $3 billion U.S federal scrappage program that was intended to provide economic incentives to U.S. residents to purchase a new, more fuel-efficient vehicle when trading in a less fuel-efficient vehicle. Although the program officially started on July 1, 2009, the processing of claims did not begin until July 24 and the program ended on August 24 because of appropriated resources were exhausted (Copeland & Kahn, 2011).…

    • 1066 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Legal Writtinbg Essay Correction
    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Legal Writtinbg Essay Correction

    This story is replete with fascinating facts and the intricacies that are inherent in the facts of the case make for a great story.The baseball bat was broken from the outset when it was bought by the plaintiff. Therefore, the defendant should have to return the baseball bat and pay the money back to the plaintiff that plaintiff paid for said bat. The plaintiff bought a baseball bat from the defendant and the baseball bat turned out to be broken because, since as soon as the defendant used the bat to play baseball, the bat shattered into a million pieces. Shattering into a million pieces certainly violates the implied warranty of merchantability under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC 2-314). No Industria De Calcados Martini Ltda. v. Maxwell Shoe Co., 36 Mass. App. Ct. 268 (Mass. App. Ct. 1994) INDUSTRIA DE CALCADOS MARTINI LTDA. v. MAXWELL SHOE CO., INC. No. 92-P-1322 APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS 36 Mass. App. Ct. 268; 630 N.E.2d 299; 1994 Mass. App. LEXIS 274; 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 89 December 20, 1993, Argued March 21, 1994, Decided. Also, there’s a case that expounded upon this issue and told us that a baseball bat can’t crack when it’s used normally. Otherwise, the store has to give back the money to the plaintiff. Dudzik v. Klein's All Sports, 158 Misc. 2d 72 (N.Y. J. Ct. 1993) Laurence Dudzik et al., Plaintiffs, v. Klein's All Sports, Defendant. SC# 92-390 JUSTICE COURT OF NEW YORK, TOWN OF COLONIE, ALBANY COUNTY 158 Misc. 2d 72; 600 N.Y.S.2d 1013; 1993 N.Y Misc. LEXIS 272; 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 592 June 9, 1993, Decided. The extrapolation information that can be clearly drawn from these cases is if someone that is a plaintiff buys a baseball bat, the said bat it must be in that condition that the was represented to the heretofore named parties. At least, the bat must be in sufficient marketable condition so that the implied warranty owing from the party of the first part to the party of the second part must be sustained. Also,…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aldoux Huxley "Brave New World" Annotated Bibliography
    • 1017 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aldoux Huxley "Brave New World" Annotated Bibliography

    Meckier, Jerome. "Debunking Our Ford: My Life and Work and _Brave New World_." South Atlantic Quarterly 78, no. 2 (Autumn, 1979): 448-459.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    baseball bat
    • 297 Words
    • 1 Page

    baseball bat

    The baseball bat was broken when it was bought by the plaintiff. The plaintiff should return the baseball bat and have his money refunded to him. When the plaintiff bought the baseball bat from the defendant the baseball bat was already broken because as soon as the defendant used the bat to play baseball, the bat shattered into a million pieces. Shattering into a million pieces certainly violates the implied warranty of merchantability under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC 2-314). No Industria De Calcados Martini Ltda. v. Maxwell Shoe Co., 36 Mass. App. Ct. 268 (Mass. App. Ct. 1994) INDUSTRIA DE CALCADOS MARTINI LTDA. v. MAXWELL SHOE CO., INC. No. 92-P-1322 APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS 36 Mass. App. Ct. 268; 630 N.E.2d 299; 1994 Mass. App. LEXIS 274; 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 89 December 20, 1993, Argued March 21, 1994, Decided. Also, there’s a case what case ? that expounded upon this issue and told us that a baseball bat can’t crack when it’s for its intended purpose. Otherwise, the store has to refund the to the plaintiff. Dudzik v. Klein's All Sports, 158 Misc. 2d 72 (N.Y. J. Ct. 1993) Laurence Dudzik et al., Plaintiffs, v. Klein's All Sports, Defendant. SC# 92-390 JUSTICE COURT OF NEW YORK, TOWN OF COLONIE, ALBANY COUNTY 158 Misc. 2d 72; 600 N.Y.S.2d 1013; 1993 N.Y Misc. LEXIS 272; 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 592 June 9, 1993, Decided. The information that can be clearly drawn from these cases is if a plaintiff buys a baseball bat, the said bat must be in the condition that the was represented by the seller. The bat must be in marketable condition so that the implied warranty from the seller to the buyer must be…

    • 297 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    help
    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    help

    This story is replete with fascinating facts and the intricacies that are inherent in the facts of the case make for a great story. The baseball bat was broken from the outset when it was bought by the plaintiff. Therefore, the defendant should have to return the baseball bat and pay the money back to the plaintiff that plaintiff paid for said bat. The plaintiff bought a baseball bat from the defendant and the baseball bat turned out to be broken since as soon as the defendant used the bat to play baseball, the bat shattered into a million pieces. Shattering into a million pieces certainly violates the implied warranty of merchantability under the Uniform Commercial Code (“U.C.C.”). INDUSTRIA DE CALCADOS MARTINI LTDA. v. MAXWELL SHOE CO., INC. No. 92-P-1322 APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS 36 Mass. App. Ct. 268; 630 N.E.2d 299; 1994 Mass. App. LEXIS 274; 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 89 December 20, 1993, Argued March 21, 1994, Decided. Also, there’s a case that expounded upon this issue and told us that a baseball bat can’t crack when it’s used normally. Otherwise, the store has to give back the money to the plaintiff. Laurence Dudzik et al., Plaintiffs, v. Klein's All Sports, Defendant. SC# 92-390 JUSTICE COURT OF NEW YORK, TOWN OF COLONIE, ALBANY COUNTY 158 Misc. 2d 72; 600 N.Y.S.2d 1013; 1993 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 272; 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 592 June 9, 1993, Decided.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Product Liability
    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Product Liability

    Consumers use a variety of products on a daily basis to assist them in accomplishing a task or completing a project and they expect the product to be properly designed and safe to use. However, in the event that a product is defective and causes injury to the person using it, the manufacturer may be liable for the injury and have to compensate the injured person (s). Companies that manufacture products need to be sure they are doing all within their power to assemble products that are free of defects that could accidentally cause harm and cost the company. Product liability is the responsibility of manufacturers, distributors and sellers of products to the public, to deliver products free of defects which harm an individual or numerous persons and to make good on that responsibility if their products are defective (Product Liability, 2011). Products containing inherent defects that cause harm to a consumer of the product, or someone to whom the product was loaned or given, are the subjects of products liability suits (Product Liability Law). Products liability claims can be based on negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty of fitness depending on the jurisdiction within which the claim is based. If a person(s) is injured while properly using a product that is defective, they have a right to file a claim against the company that would be titled a product liability lawsuit. However, in order to prevail on a product liability claim, the product complained of must be shown to be defective (Product Liability Law, 2011). A defective product causes injury or damage to a person or a person's property because of some defect in the product, its labeling or the manner in which the product was used. There are three types of product defects that incur liability in manufacturers and suppliers: design defects,…

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Paralegal Studies
    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Paralegal Studies

    This story is replete with fascinating facts and the intricacies that are inherent in the facts of the case make for a great story. The baseball bat was broken from the outset when it was bought by the plaintiff. Therefore, the defendant should have to return the baseball bat and pay the money back to the plaintiff that plaintiff paid for said bat. The plaintiff bought a baseball bat from the defendant and the baseball bat turned out to be broken since as soon as the defendant used the bat to play baseball, the bat shattered into a million pieces. Shattering into a million pieces certainly violates the implied warranty of merchantability under the Uniform Commercial Code (“U.C.C.”). INDUSTRIA DE CALCADOS MARTINI LTDA. v. MAXWELL SHOE CO., INC. No. 92-P-1322 APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS 36 Mass. App. Ct. 268; 630 N.E.2d 299; 1994 Mass. App. LEXIS 274; 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 89 December 20, 1993, Argued March 21, 1994, Decided. Also, there’s a case that expounded upon this issue and told us that a baseball bat can’t crack when it’s used normally. Otherwise, the store has to give back the money to the plaintiff. Laurence Dudzik et al.,…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Bus620 Wk 2 Assignment
    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bus620 Wk 2 Assignment

    There are numerous external factors that impact the auto industry and whether or not product marketing will be successful. Luckily, businesses can take action to make sure they are as pro-active as possible to ensure success. Unfortunately, despite planning, research, and the pro-active measures some things will also be out of one’s control and require adaptability if nothing else. With that being said, perhaps the biggest hindrances to the automobile industry are the political factors. Trade restrictions, tax policies, employment regulations, and consumer protection legislation, fair and safe markets, political influences on business infrastructure can all vary substantially from one country to the next (Finch, 2012). This is…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics