Preview

The Star Chamber Criminal Justice

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1188 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Star Chamber Criminal Justice
Although I am not a criminal justice student at UNH, I believe understanding justice and the law are imperative because we are all bound by the law of the land. Being ignorant of it is no defense. Even if we do not understand it or aren’t aware of it, it does not matter, the law applies to every citizen. The movie “The Star Chamber” touches on the ethics of criminal justice, which is the moral philosophy of the law. It questions what is right and what is wrong and how that does not fit into the law over a technicality.

As we saw in the movie, justice and the law do not equate. This is shown in the movie when two men who tortured and murdered a little boy were caught and almost convicted until their defense attorney argued that they were unlawfully pulled over. His first argument was the cops were told they had warrants out for expired paperwork which gave them
…show more content…
While chasing this man for quite a while they saw the man throw something out in a trash barrel in the midst of running. The officers stopped and knew they were not legally able to search the trash can without a warrant. They waited until the garbage truck that was on the street dumped it into the truck because then they wouldn’t need a warrant, for it would be common trash. They searched the truck and found a gun and they knew it was his since that trash was not mixed with the other trash

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Minnesota vs. Timothy Dickerson, two police officers parked in an unmarked car, outside of an apartment building known for trafficking contraband substances, did willfully and knowingly stop and frisk respondent due to suspicious and evasive behavior, exiting the twelve-unit apartment building. The officers felt that upon his exit and approach towards patrol car, and eye contact with one of the officers, he turned and proceeded into a side alley. Officers then pursued respondent feeling his suspicious and evasive behavior was probable of being criminal in nature. They pulled their car into the alley and immediately stopped and searched the defendants outer clothing finding no weapons. During the cursory search one officer testified that he had felt a cellophane bag containing crack cocaine later when weighed a total of 1/5th of a gram was found. The officers claimed it within their scope to search and seize what the officer suspected to be drugs inside the defendants clothing.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chris Finish is a licensed driver who has owned his car for about six months. On the night of his arrest, he picked up Josh Kings at approximately 8:00 p.m. While double parked outside a store 24 police notice an expired inspection sticker on the defendants vehicle. the officer stopped them at approximately 10:30 p.m. After questions them for a bit the officer notices a handgun under the passenger seat. Both men denied any knowledge of the gun. The defendants lawyer moved for a directed verdict, The motion was denied, Chris is now appealing his conviction. John Kings has not been seen sense the night of the arrest.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Terry Vs Ohio Case Study

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In this case John Terry was seen by an officer, seeming to be casing a store for a robbery. “The Petitioner, John W. Terry was stopped and searched by an officer after the officer observed the Petitioner seemingly casing a store for a potential robbery. The officer approached the Petitioner for questioning and decided to search him first.” The officer finally decided to approach the men for questioning, after observing them for quite a long time and given the nature of the behavior the officer decided to perform a quick search of the men before questioning. A quick frisking of the Petitioner produced a concealed weapon and the Petitioner was charged with carrying a concealed weapon.…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John W. Terry (the “Petitioner”), was stopped and searched after seemingly casing a store for robbery. Terry was approached by the officer who decided to search him verses questioning. Synopsis of rule of law says that an officer may search for weapons without a warrant, without probable cause, especially if the individual is believed to be armed and dangerous. From the officers observation he believed that they were casing the store for a potential robbery, due to the nature of the situation the officer decided to quick search before questioning which led to a concealed weapon being found.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robinette was stopped for speeding. After running his license through the system, Robinette was issued a verbal warning from the officer. The officer then asked Robinette to step out of the car and if any illegal weapons or drugs was in the vehicle. Robinette responded “no” and consented to the officer’s request to search the vehicle. A small amount of marijuana and a MDMA pill was found in the car. Robinette was then arrested.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Cleveland detective (McFadden), on a downtown beat which he had been patrolling for many years, observed two stranger on a street corner. He saw them proceed alternately back and forth along an identical route, pausing to stare in the same store window, which they did for a total of about 24 times. Each completion of the route was followed by a conference between the two on a corner, at one of which they were joined by a third man who left swiftly. Suspecting the two men of "casing a job, a stick-up," the officer followed them and saw them rejoin the third man a couple of blocks away in front of a store. The officer approached the three, identified himself as a policeman, and asked their names. The men "mumbled something," whereupon McFadden spun petitioner around, patted down his outside clothing, and found in his overcoat pocket, but was unable to remove, a pistol. The officer ordered the three into the store. He removed petitioner's overcoat, took out a revolver, and ordered the three to face the wall with their hands raised. He patted down the outer clothing of Chilton and Katz and seized a revolver from Chilton's outside overcoat pocket. He did not put his hands under the outer garments of Katz (since he discovered nothing in his pat-down which might have been a weapon), or under petitioner's or Chilton's outer garments until he felt the guns. The three were taken to the police station. Petitioner and Chilton were charged with carrying concealed weapons.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On May 6, 2016 a police officer found himself facing a young African American holding a pistol. Police officer, Stephan Mader, was let go from his position weeks later for not shooting the African American with the pistol. Stephan Mader is suing the city because he does not think it is fair that he was let go for not shooting a person. The reason Stephan Mader did not shot the African American was because it seem that the guy, Mr. Williams, wanted to commit suicide by a police officer. Mr. William told Stephan to shot him. Stephan was trying to come down Mr. William until two other police officer saw Mr. William waving the gun and shot him dead. Then they notice that the weapon that Mr. William had was not loaded. A country prosecutor had…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: There was a warrant for an offender who supposedly robbed a coin shop. Two officers decided to locate the offender’s house where they meet the offender’s wife. Having a conversation the two officers ask the offender wife can they come inside the house and which she agreed to? Waiting for the offender who committed the crime shows up minutes later. After the offender recognizes that they were two police officers at his home he denied there request to search his home. Police officers instead continue to search around the house without a warrant only to find out evidence that was use in the breaking of the coin shop but against offender’s objections.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wyoming V. Shatzer

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    FACTS: After a routine traffic stop, a police officer noticed a hypodermic syringe in the shirt pocket of the car’s driver, which the driver soon admitted was for using drugs. The officer searched the passenger compartment for contraband and came upon a purse, which the respondent, a passenger in the car, claimed was hers. There was drug paraphernalia inside, and the respondent was arrested on drug charges. The evidence was admitted at trial and respondent was convicted. The Wyoming Supreme Court then reversed, holding that an officer with probable cause to search a vehicle may search all containers that might conceal the object of the search, but if the officer knows or should know that the container belongs to a passenger who is not suspected of criminal activity, then the container is not allowed to be searched under the Fourth Amendment unless someone had the opportunity to conceal contraband. The State of Wyoming was then granted certiorari.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Horton v California

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In California a police officer decided to search petitioner Horton’s home because he felt there was probable cause, the officer was searching for the stolen goods and the weapons used during the crime. The warrant given to the officer only authorized him to search for the stolen goods. As he made his way into the home of petitioner Horton he did not recover the stolen items, but found the weapons used during the crime and recovered them. When it got to the court the recovered weapons were allowed to be used against Horton, and Horton was later convicted of the crime. Since the officer testified that he did have intentions of looking for other evidence while looking for the stolen goods, the California court of appealed the conviction and then granted certiorari.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried.In this trial, the defendant is being tried for killing his father. Some of the men in the jury are chosen very poorly. One example of them being chosen poorly is their past clouds their judgment. Juror number three had a bad past with his son which lead him to believe that all children are ungrateful and useless. “You're right. It's the kids. The way they are you know? They don't listen. I've got a kid. When he was 8 years old, he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed I told him right out “I'm going to make a man out of you or I'm going to have to bust you up into little pieces trying.” When he was 15 he hit me in the face. He's big, you know. I haven't seen him in three years. Rotten kid! You work your heart out.... All right let's get on with it.” This is unfair to the defendant because he's now seen as ungrateful and rotten to juror number three even before the case. The US should look…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The criminal justice is separated into three branches which all supports each other. What is each branch responsible for? The law enforcement branch is responsible for enforcing the law, investigating crimes that were committed, making arrest and providing safety. The courts responsibility is to uphold the law, settle disputes and make sure each party is giving a fair chance to provide evidence, facts to support their case. The corrections branch enforces punishment whether its jail, prison, probation or parole.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is a very fragile word that could be portrayed into many different understandings. The definition of a crime; According to "Dictionary.com" (2014), " is an action or an instance of negligence that is deemed injurious to the public welfare or morals or to the interests of the state, and that is legally prohibited" (Noun 1.) Law means having a set of rules and regulations in which communities and society as a whole abide by. Crime can be understood as acting against those laws (rules) that have a punishment in return for those actions. There are two models that are most commonly used by society to determine whether certain acts…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Star Chamber Trial

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The movie, The Star Chamber, takes a poignant look at our judicial system and forces us to consider what is legally and morally right. The movie stars Michael Douglas as a judge who is discouraged after he sees that one of his cases is dismissed on a technicality. The defendants, two men charged with kidnapping and murder, are released because the police officers who arrested them did not follow the law when it came to collecting the evidence. Michael Douglas's character becomes highly discouraged when two men, whom he believes are clearly guilty, are set free.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Please accept this letter as a complaint of employment discrimination based on gender by Alice Bennett. Please also accept this letter as an appearance by Marcia Robinson of Auburn University Legal Services on behalf of Mrs. Alice Bennett.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics